References
- Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Witt K, et al. Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 199o;1o8:286-9o.
- Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1412–7.
- Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369–74.
- Strahlman E, Ford D, Whelton P, Sommer A. Vision screening in a primary care setting, a missedopportunity? Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2159–64.
- Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1684–9.
- Kosoko 0, Sommer A, Auer C. Screening with automated perimetry using a threshold-related three-level algorithm. Ophthalmology 1986;93:882–6.
- Wang F, Quigley HA, Tielsch JM. Screening for glaucoma in a medical clinic with photographs of the nerve fiber layer. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:796-80o.
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth edition, Vol 2, 1989.
- Wang F, Ford D, Tielsch JM, et al. Undetected eye disease in a primary care clinic population. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1821–8.
- CDC, US Department of Health and Human Services. Vital and Health Statistics National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1989 Summary. Data from the National Health Survey. Series 13, No.uo. DHHS publication, 1992.
- Sweet EH, Tark E III. Eye care by primary care physicians - A survey of internists and family practitioners in the Sacramento, California, area. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1454–60.
- Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al: A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:1102-1o.
- Eddy DM, Sanders LE, Eddy JF: The value of screening for glaucoma with tonometry. Surv Ophthalmol 1983;28:194–205.
- Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, et al. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3271–7.
- Damato BE. Oculokinetic perimetry: a simple visual field test for use in the community. Br J Ophthalmol 1985;69:927–31.
- Henson DB, Bryson H. Clinical results with the Henson-Hamblin CFS2000. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987;49:233–8.
- Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, et al. Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:699–708.
- Patel KH, Javitt JC, Tielsch JM, et al. Incidence of acute angle-closure glaucoma after pharmacologic mydriasis. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:709–17.
- Moss SE, Klein R, Kessler SD, Richie KA. Comparison between ophthal-moscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1985;92:62–7.
- Nathan DM, Fogel HA, Godine JE, et al. Role of diabetologists in evaluating diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1991;14:26–33.
- Sussman EJ, William GT, Keith AS. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 1982;247(23):3231–4.
- Gehrs KM, Chong LP, Guzman DA, et al. Can we educate primary care physicians about diabetic retinopathy after graduation?: primary results of the diabetic retinopathy education study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(4):I182.
- Awh CC, Javitt JC, Chong LP, et al. Ophthalmoscopic diagnosis and referral of diabetic eye disease by primary care physicians. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(4): 713.
- Quigley HA, Reacher M, Katz J, et al. Quantitative grading of nerve fiber layer photographs. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1800–7.
- Preferred Practice Pattern: The comprehensive eye examination in an otherwise asymptomatic adult. San Francisco CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1989.