Military laser weapons: Current controversies

References

• Marshall J. Blinding laser weapons — still available on the battlefield. Br Med J. 1998;316:939.
   Google Scholar
• Thach AB. Laser injuries of the eye. Mt Ophthalmol Clinics. 1999;39:13–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong TY, Seet B, Ang CL. Eye injuries in twentieth century warfare. A historical perspective. Surv Ophthalmol. 1997;41:433–59.
   Google Scholar
• Doswald-Beck L, editor. Blinding weapons. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross Publications, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mellerio J, Marshall J, Tengroth B, Anderberg B, Wolbarst M. Battlefield laser weapons: an assessment of systems, hazards, injuries and ophthalmic resources required for treatment. Laser Light Ophthalmol. 1991;4:41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Tengroth B, Anderberg B. Blinding laser weapons. Laser Light Ophthalmol. 1991;4: 35–9:
   Google Scholar
• Peters A. Blinding laser weapons. Medicine, Conflict Survival 1996;12: 107–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderberg B, Wolbarsht ML. Laser weapons: the dawn of a new military age. New York: Plenum Press, 1992: 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zaloga SI Soviets close to deploying battlefield beam weapons. Armed Forces J Int. 1990;May:28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Perroots LH. Soviet beam weapons are near tactical maturity. Signal. 1990;March:37–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego F, Daly M. Laser weapon in RN service. Jane's Defence Weekly. 1990;Jan:13–48.
   Google Scholar
• Turbe G. Laser weapons at sea. Int Defense Rev. 1990;8:853–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mader TH, Aragones JV, Chandler AC, Hazlehurst JA, Heier J, Kingham JD, Stein E. Ocular and ocular adnexal injuries treated by United States military ophthalmologists during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1462–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel VP, Birngruber R, Lorenz B. Clinical observations of six cases of laser injury to the eye. Health Phys. 1989;56:705—m.
   Google Scholar
• Modarres-Zadeh M, Parvaresh MM, Pourbabak S, Peyman GA. Accidental parafoveal laser burn from a standard military ruby range finder. Retina 1995;15:356–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch GM. Laser injury. Navy Med. 1996;87:23–7.
   Google Scholar
• Report of Main Committee III. Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects. Vienna: October II, 1995, CCW/CONF 1/4.
   Google Scholar
• Peters A. Blinding laser weapons: the need to ban a cruel and inhumane weapon. Human Rights Watch Arms Project. 1995;7:I–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J. The United Nations Weaponry Review Conference. Asia Poe J Ophthalmol. 1996;8:36.
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Delegation to Main Committee III of the 1995 Review Conference on the Convention on Conventional Weapons. Blinding weapons under the laws of armed conflict. 1995:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lewer N. Non-lethal weapons. Medicine War 1995;1 I:78–90.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg B, Wolbarsht ML. Hand-held laser weapons are waiting in the wings. Armed Forces J Int. 1992; 129:60–1.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg B. Protection and countermeasures against laser weapons. Milit Technol. 1993;May: 2o–3o.
   Google Scholar
• Witt M. Lasers in military roles. Asian Defence J 1988;March:4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jaszka PR. The laser and its military applications: a primer. Defense Electronics. 1989;July:60–3.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg B. The low-energy laser aimed at the eye as a potential anti-personnel weapon. Roy United Services Inst J. 1988;Spring:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg B, Wolbarsht ML. Blinding lasers: the nastiest weapon? Milit Technol. 1990;March:58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi CS, Grey RH, Hart CD. Laser pointers revisited: a survey of 14 patients attending casualty at the Bristol Eye Hospital. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:I 164–7.
   Google Scholar
• Muller K. Laser technology: military lasers become eye-safe. Milit Technol. 1987;July:78–9.
   Google Scholar
• Heppner J. Eyesafe laser range-finders. Milit Technol. 1994;May: 85–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gillow JT. Another weapon too far: the anti-personnel laser. J Roy Soc Med. 1995;88:347–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro N. US Army to seek 48 Stingray lasers to help blind enemy vehicles, troops. Defense News. 1990;March:33.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary AP, editor. Jane's Electro-Optic Systems. London: Butler & Tanner, 1996:33.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas SR. Aircrew laser eye protection: visual consequences and mission performance. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994;65 (Suppl.):1o8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tengroth BM. Laser weapons designed to produce blindness. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;1 16:370—I.39
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott M, Atwal K. New weapons that win without killing on DOD's horizon. Defense Electronics. 1993; 25:41–6.
   Google Scholar
• China North Industries Corporation. Fact sheet: ZM-87 portable laser disturber. Beijing, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Halsey JD. High energy laser work yields efficient devices. Signal. 1990;March:41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwell JR. Laser accidents: reviewing thirty years of incidents: what are the concerns — old and new? J Laser Appl. 1994;6:203-I I.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson SI Eye Injuries from laser exposure: a review. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998;69:519–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall J. Structural aspects of laser induced damage and their function implications. Health Phys. 1989;56:617–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Army Ordnance Missile and Munitions Center and School. Training support package: employ of directed energy and laser protective measures. Redstone, Alabama: US Government Printing Office, 1991:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wong TY, Smith GS, Lincoln AE, Tielsch JM. Ocular trauma in the United States Army—hospitalization records from 1985 through 1994. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:645–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderberg B, Sjolund B, Bolander G, Steinvall 0, Tengroth B. Vulnerability of the retina to injury from a military ruby range finder at battlefield distances. Health Phys. 1989;56:743–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kosnik W. Effects of a laser-induced temporary scotoma on target acquisition performance. Hum Factors. 1995;37:356–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamper DA, Lund DJ, Mochany JW, Stuck BE. Laboratory simulator and field pursuit tracking performance with females and males in the presence of laser glare. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997;68:580–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alhalel A, Glovinsky Y, Treister G, Bartov E, Blumenthal M, Belkin M. Long-term follow-up of accidental parafoveal laser burns. Retina. 1993;13:152–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe JA. Laser retinal injury. Milit Med. 1985;150:177–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuck BE, Zwick J, Molchany JW, Lund DJ, Gagliano DA. Accidental human laser retinal injuries from military laser systems. SPIE Proceedings of Laser-Inflicted Eye Injuries: Epidemiology, Prevention and Treatment. San Antonio, 1996; 2674:7–2o.
   Google Scholar
• Pariselle J, Sastourne JC, Bidaux F, May F, Renard JP, Maurin IF. Eye injuries caused by lasers in military and industrial environment. Apropos of 13 cases. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1998;21:661–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roider J, Buesgen P, Hoerauf J, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Laqua H, Birngruber R. Macular injury by a military range finder. Retina. 1999, 19:531–5.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer WJ. Lasers: direct-fire weapons for and against us. Field Artillery. 1988;June:52–3.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson LE Keeping an eye on laser safety. Occup Health Safety. 1996;Sept:29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hammick M. Laser protection for AFVs: the eyes have it. Int Defense Rev. 1991;August:818–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C. New chemical filters block laser bursts. Science News. 1996;150: i65.
   Google Scholar
• Wong TY, Seet B. A behavioral analysis of eye protection use by soldiers. Milit Med. 1997;162: 744–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen EM. Defending against battlefield laser weapons. Milit Rev. 1987;May:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Choi DW. The role of glutamate neurotoxicity in hypoxic-ischemic neuronal death. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:171–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner M, Solberg Y, Turetz J, Belkin M. Neuroprotective therapy for argon-laser induced retinal injury. Exp Eye Res. 1997;65:485–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg Y, Rosner M, Turetz J, Belkin M. MK-8o, has neuroprotective and anti-proliferative effect in retinal laser injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:1380–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler D, Toman J, editors. The laws of armed conflict. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988:6.
   Google Scholar
• Prokosch E. The technology of killing: a military and political history of antipersonnel weapons. London: Zed Books, 1995:186–98.
   Google Scholar
• Parks WH. Memorandum of law: the use of lasers as anti-personnel weapons. The Army Lawyer. 1988; Nov:3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond BL, Ross A. Emotional adjustment of newly blinded soldiers. Am J Psychiat. 1945;102: 367–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herby P. Outlaw blinding. Bull Atomic Scientists. 1995;51:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoth A. Disabling technologies. Int Defense Rev. 1994;July:33–9.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland RM. The effects of weapons on health. Lancet. 1996; 347:450–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North CM. Ban on anti-eye lasers the right move. Aviat Week Space Technol. 1995;143:70.
   Google Scholar
• Fox R. Weapons intended to blind. Lancet. 1994;344:1649-5o.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay S. Experts plan reduction of harm caused by weapons. Lancet. 1996;347:749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdstock D. International Committee of the Red Cross: the medical profession and the effects of weapons. Med Conflict Survival. 1996;12:254–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coupland RM. The effects of weapons: surgical challenge and medical dilemma. J Roy Coll Surg Edinb. 1996;41:65–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar