Avoiding complications in combined phacotrabeculectomy

References

• Cekic O, Batman C, Totan Y, Emre MI, Zilelogliu O. Changes in anterior chamber depth and intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocu- lar lens implantation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Aug; 29(8):639–642.
   Google Scholar
• Sacca S, Marletta A, Pascotto A, Barbarino S, Rolando M, Giannetti R, Calabria G. Daily tonometric curves after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jan;85(1);24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Changes in anterior chamber angle width and depth after intraocular lens implantation in eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000 Apr;107(4):698–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glau- coma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Nov;27(11): 1779–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjalainen T, Vesti E, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Pha- coemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in eyes with open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scan. 2001 Jun;79(3):313–316.
   Google Scholar
• Lai JS, Chua JK, Leung AT, Lam DS. Latanoprost versus timolol gel to prevent ocular hypertension after pha- coemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Mar;26(3):386–391.
   Google Scholar
• Rainer G, Menapace R, Findl O, Petternel V, Kiss B, Georgopolous M. Intraindividual comparison of the effects of a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination and latanoprost on intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 May;27(5):706–710.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins JJ, Apel A, Trope GE, Rootman DS. Early pressure after phacoemulsification combined with trabe- culectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Apr;29(4):273– 279.
   Google Scholar
• Gurwitz JH, Glynn RJ, Monane M, Everitt DE, Gilden D, Smith N, Avorn J. Treatment for glaucoma: Adherence by the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):711–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latina MA, Sibayan SA, Shin DH, Noecker RJ, Marcellino G. Q-switched 532-nm Nd: YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clini- cal study. Ophthalmology. 1998 Nov;(105):2082–2088.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs MC, Jay JL. Age over 46 years does not affect the pressure lowering effect of trabeculectomy in primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Mar;83(3):280– 284.
   Google Scholar
• Allingham R. “Filtering Surgery Management in Glau- coma.” Chandler and Grant’s Glaucoma 4th Ed. [edited by] David L Epstein Williams & Wilkins 1997. Baltimore, MD. Pp 516–537.
   Google Scholar
• Tanito M, Ohira A, Chihara E. Factors leading to reduced intraocular pressure after combined trabeculotomy and cataract surgery. J Glaucoma. 2002 Feb;11(1):3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasoglu OE, Hosal B, Tekeli O, Gursel E. Risk factors for vitreous loss in cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul–Sep;10(3):227–232.
   Google Scholar
• Anand N, Menage MJ, Bailey C. Phacoemulsification trabeculectomy compared to other methods of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997 Dec;75(6):705–710.
   Google Scholar
• Kosmin AS, Wishart PK. Long term intraocular pressure control after cataract extraction with trabeculectomy: pha- coemulsification versus extracapsular technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Feb;24(2):249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Heuring AH, Hutz WW, Hoffmann PC, Eckhardt HB. Com- bined phacoemulsification and goniotrepanation in primary chronic open angle glaucoma and classical pseudoexfolia- tion glaucoma. Ophthalmologe. 1999 May;96(5):312–318.
   Google Scholar
• Honjo M, Tanihara H, Inatani M, Honda Y, Ogino N, Euno S, Negi A, Ichioka H, Mizoguchi T, Matsumara M, Nagata M. Phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and trabeculectomy to treat pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jun;24(6):781–786.
   Google Scholar
• Kang YH, Lee JH. Phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in uveitis. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;11(2):94–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lin CL, Wang AG, Chou JC, Shieh G, Liu JH. Heparin- surface-modified intraocular lens implantation in patients with glaucoma, diabetes, or uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994 Sep;20(5):550–553.
   Google Scholar
• Trocme SD, Li H. Effect of heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses on postoperative inflammation after phacoemulsification: a randomized trial in a United States patient population. Heparin-Surface-Modified Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000 Jun;107(6):1031–1037.
   Google Scholar
• Broadway DC, Grierson I, Hitchings RA. Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;125(6):805–818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baudouin C, Pisella PJ, Fillacier K, Goldschild M, Becquet F, De Saint Jean M, Bechetoille A. Ocular surface inflammatory changes induced by topical antiglaucoma drugs: human and animal studies. Ophthalmology. 1999 Mar;106(3):556–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson DW, Alward WL, Barad JP, Zimmerman MB, Carney BL. A randomized study of Mitomycin augmenta- tion in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1997 Apr;104(4):719–724.
   Google Scholar
• Derick RJ, Evans J, Baker ND. Combined phacoemulsifi- cation and trabeculaectomy versus trabeculectomy alone: a comparison study using Mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Sep;29(9):707–713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin DH. Hughes BA, Song MS, Kim C, Yang KJ, Shah MI, Juzyck MS, Obertynski T. Primary glaucoma triple procedure with or without adjunctive Mitomycin. Prognos- tic factors for filtration failure. Ophthalmology. 1996 Nov; 103(11):1925–1933.
   Google Scholar
• Sihota R, Dada T, Gupta SD, Sharma S, Arora R, Agarwal HC. Conjunctival dysfunction and Mitomycin C induced hypotony. J Glaucoma. 2000 Oct;9(5):392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Akova YA, Balut S, Dabil H, Duman S. Late bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999 Feb;30(2):146–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hong SJ, Wu KY, Wang HZ, Lai YH. Toxic effects of Mitomycin C on cultured ciliary process cells and trabec- ular meshwork cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Aug;17(4):331–342.
   Google Scholar
• Robin AL, Ramakrishnan R, Krishnadas R, Smith SD, Katz JD, Selvaraj S, Skuta GL, Bhatnagar R. A long term dose response study of Mitomycin in glaucoma filtration surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;115(8):969–974.
   Google Scholar
• Robin AL, Ramakrishnan R, Krishnadas R, Smith SD, Katz JD, Selvaraj S, Skuta GL, Bhatnagar R. A long term dose response study of Mitomycin in glaucoma filtration surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;115(8):969–974.
   Google Scholar
• KimYY, Sexton RM, Shin DH, Kim C, Ginde SA, Ren J, Lee D, Kupin TH. Outcomes of primary phakic tra- beculectomies without versus with 0.5- to 1-minute versu 3- to 5-minute Mitomycin C. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;126(6):755–762.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK, Skuta GL. Viscoelastic related glaucomas. Semin Ophthalmol. 1994 Dec;9(4):229–234.
   Google Scholar
• Shingleton BJ, Mitrev PV. Anterior chamber maintainer versus viscoelastic material for intraocular lens implanta- tion: case-control study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 May;27(5):711–714.
   Google Scholar