Training compensatory viewing strategies: Feasibility and effect on practical fitness to drive in subjects with visual field defects

References

• Zihl J. Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33:287–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles G, Esser J, Eckstein A, Tiede A, Gerhard H, Diener HC. Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2001;306:189–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Laderman DJ, Kelsch R, Stelmack J, McMahon T. Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Laderman DJ, Kelsch R, Ho K, McMahon T. Use of bioptic amorphic lenses to expand the visual field in patients with peripheral loss. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:518–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss C. Training the low vision driver. In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman K, editors. Vision rehabilitation: Assessment, intervention and outcomes. Selected papers from Vision ’99: International Conference on Low Vision, July 1999. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers b.v., 2000; 268–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ball KK, Beard BL, Roenker DL, Miller RL, Griggs DS. Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. J Opt Soc Am [A]. 1988;5:2210–2219.
   Google Scholar
• Ball K. Enhancing mobility in the elderly: Attentional interventions for driving. In: Dollinger SMC, DiLalla LF, editors. Assessment and intervention issues across the life span. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1997; 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier M, Gauthier L, Lambert J, Pepin EP, Robillard A, Dubouloz DJ, et al. Evaluation of left visuospatial neglect: Norms and discrimination power of two tests. Neuropsychology. 1990;4:87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53:740–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vision Sci. 1988;2:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Colenbrander A. The functional vision score. In: Kooijman AC, Looijestijn PL, Welling JA, van der Wildt GJ, editors. Low vision: Research and new developments in rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1994; 552–561.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley C, Ball K, McGwin G Jr., Sloane ME, Roenker DL, White MF, et al. Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;279:1083–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3d ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kaernbach C. Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Percept Psychophys. 1991; 49:227–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC. Does age change the distribution of visual attention? A comment on McCalley, Bouwhuis, Juola (1995). J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 2000;55B: 187–190.
   Google Scholar
• I. De Raedt R, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen The relationship between cognitive/neuropsychological factors and car driving performance in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48:1664–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withaar FK. Divided attention and driving: The effects of aging and brain injury. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Groningen, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ross FL. The use of computers in occupational therapy for visual- scanning training. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46:314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 3 ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
   Google Scholar