Achieving functional literacy for children with visual impairments

References

• Faye EE, editor. Clinical low vision. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1984. 2nd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda G. Management of the patient with subnormal vision. 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom AA Jr. Research needs in low vision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(11):776–779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokes L. Educational considerations for children with low vision. In: Faye EE, editor. Clinical low vision. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1976;346.
   Google Scholar
• Baldasare J, Watson GR, Whittaker SG, et al. The development and evaluation of a reading test for low vision individuals with macular loss. J Visual Impair Blind. 1986;80:795–798.
   Google Scholar
• Raasch TW, Rubin GS. Reading with low vision. J Am Optom Assoc. 1993;64(1):15–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz M. Low vision patient populations: A comparative statistical analysis. Optom Mon. 1982;73(11):619–627.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig AJ. A framework for understanding the literacy of individuals with visual impairment. J Visual Impair Blind. 1992;86:277–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corn AL, Ryser GR. Access to print for students with low vision. J Visual Impair Blind. 1989;83(7):340–349.
   Google Scholar
• Newman AP, Beverstock C. Adult literacy: Context and challenges. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Smith CB. Emergent literacy: An environmental concept. Reading Teach. 1989;42:528.
   Google Scholar
• Sticht TG. Measuring adult literacy: A response. In: Venezky RL, Wagner DA, Ciliberti BS, editors. Toward defining literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1990;48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton JM, Wright S. On the way to literacy: Early experiences for young visually impaired children. RE:view. 1991;23:55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton JM. Emergent literacy: A new perspective. J Visual Impair Blind. 1996;90(3):177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzby E, Teale W. Emergent literacy. In: Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthal PB, Pearson PD, editors. Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman, 1991; Vol. 2: 727–757.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins GE, McGee LM. Visually impaired and sighted children’s emerging concepts about written language. In: Yaden DB, Templeton S, editors. Metalinguistic awareness and beginning literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1986;259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky RL. Definitions of literacy. In: Venezky RL, Wagoner DA, Ciliberti BS, editors. Toward defining literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1990;70–74.
   Google Scholar
• Walters K, Daniell B, Trachsel M. Formal and functional approaches to literacy. Lang Arts. 1987;64:855–868.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig AJ, Holbrook MC. Determining the reading medium for students with visual impairments: A diagnostic teaching approach. J Visual Impair Blind. 1989;83:296–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway W. Education and health of the partially seeing child. New York: Columbia University Press, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Barraga NC. Increased visual behavior in low vision children. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Birch JW, Tisdall WJ, Peabody RL, Sterrett R. School achievement and effect of type size on reading in visually handicapped children. Pittsburgh: Program in Special Education and Rehabilitation, Cooperative Research Project #1766. School of Education, University of Pittsburgh, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Craig CJ, DePriest L, Harnack K. Teacher’s perspectives on selecting literacy media for children with visual impairments. J Visual Impair Blind. 1997;91(4):539–545.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig AJ, Holbrook MC. Determining the reading medium for visually impaired students via diagnostic teaching. J Visual Impair Blind. 1991;85:61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig AJ, Ross DB. A procedure to evaluate the relative effectiveness of reading in large and regular print. J Visual Impair Blind. 1991;85:198–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold S, Mangold P. Selecting the most appropriate primary learning medium for students with functional vision. J Visual Impair Blind. 1989; 83:294–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara WJ, Paterson GD, Tinker MA. The influence of size of type on speed of reading in the primary grades. Sight Saving Rev. 1953;23:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Morris OF. Reading performance of normally sighted and partially sighted 3rd and 4th grade students using regular print and large print (PhD dissertation). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan LL, Habel A. Reading speeds with textbooks in large and in standard print. Sight Saving Rev. 1973;43:107–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sykes KS. A comparison of the effectiveness of standard print in facilitating the reading of visually impaired students. Educ Visually Handicap. 1971;3(4):97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig AJ, Layton CA, Ross DB. The relative effectiveness of reading in large print and with low vision devices for students with low vision. J Visual Impair Blind. 1992;86(1): 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jones J. Blind children: Degree of vision, mode of reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan CY. The visually impaired. In: Kirk SA, Weiner B, editors. Behavioral research on exceptional children. Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan CY. Blind children: Degree of vision, mode of reading: A 1963 replication. In: Nolan CY, editor. Inspection and introspection of special education. Washington DC: Council for Exceptional Children, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan CY. Reading and listening in learning by the blind. Progress report. Louisville: American Printing House for the Blind, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson L. Literacy development in the early years: Through children’s eyes. New York: Teachers College Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Clay MM. Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin RB. Sight-saving classes in the public schools. Boston: Harvard Bulletins in Education, No. 7, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Corn AL, Koenig AJ, editors. Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives. New York: AFB Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig AJ, Holbrook MC. Learning media assessment of students with visual impairments. 2nd ed. Austin: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks SZ. Educating students who have visual impairments with other disabilities: An overview. In: Sacks SZ, Silberman RK, editors. Educating students who have visual impairments with other disabilities. Baltimore: Paul Brooks, 1998;3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Beninger A, Singer A. Transdisciplinary teaming: An inservice training activity. Teach Except Child. 1992;24:58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon S, Lyon G. Team functioning and staff development: A role release approach to providing integrated educational services for severely handicapped students. J Assoc Severely Handicap. 1980;5:250–263.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze T. Communications skills. In: Scholl G, editor. Foundation of education for blind and visually handicapped children and youth: Theory and practice. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1986;310.
   Google Scholar
• Mangold S, Mangold P. Selecting the most appropriate primary learning medium for students with functional vision. J Visual Impair Blind. 1989; 83:294–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caton H, editor. Print in Braille literacy: Selecting appropriate learning medium. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner LR, Corn AL. Low vision: Access to print, http://www.ed.arizona.edu/dvi/Position%20 paper/low_vision_print.html
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson ME, Stewart IW. Iowa’s pediatric low vision services. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67(7):397–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar