Artificial Insemination in Poultry

REFERENCES

• ALLEN, T. E. (1957). Artificial insemination of chickens and turkeys. Div. 1, Rep. Div. Anim. Hlth. Prod., C.S.I.R.O. Australia Ser. P. 1, 19 pp. (Mimeograph).
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous (1960). Peritonitis in turkeys. Report on the Animal Health Services in Great Britain, H.M.S.O. p. 58.
   Google Scholar
• ASMUNDSON, V. S. and LORENZ, F. W. (1955). Pheasant-turkey hybrids. Science 121: 307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASMUNDSON, V. S. and LORENZ, F. W. (1957). Hybrids of ring-necked pheasants, turkeys and domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 36: 1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLOUNT, W. P. (1951). Hen batteries. London: Bailliere, Tindall & Cox.
   Google Scholar
• BLOUNT, W. P. (1958). B. O. C. M. Quart. Poult. Bull. No. 19, 16.
   Google Scholar
• BURROWS, W. H. and QUINN, J. P. (1935). A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 14: 251.
   Google Scholar
• BURROWS, W. H. and TITUS, H. W. (1938). Vitamin A deficiency and semen production in chickens. Poult. Sci. 17: 224.
   Google Scholar
• CARSON, J. D., LORENZ, F. W. and ASMUNDSON, V. S. (1955). Semen production in the turkey male. 2. Age at sexual maturity. Poult. Sci. 34: 344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARTER, R. D., McCARTNEY, M. G., CHAMBERLIN, V. D. and WYNE, J. W. (1957). The effect of storage time and temperature on fertilizing capacity of turkey semen. Poult. Sci. 36: 618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHUBB, L. G. (1960). Nutrition and reproduction in the domestic fowl. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19: 28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, D. M. (1955). A note on a collection apparatus for avian semen. Vet. Rec. 67: 331.
   Google Scholar
• COOPER, D. M. and ROWELL, J. G. (1957). Laboratory prediction of the fertilizing capacity ofcock semen. Poult. Sci. 36: 284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, D. M. and ROWELL, J. G. (1958). Relations between fertility, embryonic survival and some semen characteristics in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 37: 699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, D. M., CHUBB, L. G. and ROWELL, J. G. (1963). The effect of manganese on reproductionin the domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 4: 83.
   Google Scholar
• GABRIEL, I. (1957). A complete one-man technique for the collection of cock semen and the insemination of caged hens. Poult. Sci. 36: 1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GARREN, H. W. and SHAFFNER, C. S. (1952). The effect of temperatute and time of storage on the fertilizing capacity of undiluted fowl semen. Poult. Sci. 31: 137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOWE, R. S. (1956). Environment and poultry breeding problems. 2. A comparison of the egg production of seven S.C. White Leghorns strains housed in laying cages and floor pens. Poult. Sci. 35: 430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARPER, J. A. (1955). The effect of holding time of turkey semen on fertilizing capacity. Poult. Sci. 34: 1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAMAR, G. A. R. (1958). The collection of cock's semen without milking the copulatory organ. Poult. Sci. 37: 1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAMAR, G. A. R. (1960). Seasonal variation in sperm abnormalities. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 28: 16.
   Google Scholar
• KAMAR, G. A. R. and BADRELDIN, A. L. (1959). Sperm morphology and viability. Poult. Sci. 38: 301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAKE, P. E. (1956). A retarding factor in the problem of fowl semen storage. Proc. IIIrd Int. Congr. Anim. Repr. Cambridge (Sec. 3): 104.
   Google Scholar
• LAKE, P. E. (1957). Fowl semen as collected by the massage method. J. agric. Sci. 49: 120.
   Google Scholar
• LAKE, P. E. and WOOD-GUSH, D. G. M. (1956). Diurnal rhythms in semen yields and mating behaviour in the domestic cock. Nature (London) 178: 853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LORENZ, F. W., ABBOTT, U. K., ASMUNDSON, V. S., ADLER, H. E., KRATZER, F. H., OGASAWARA, F. X. and CARSON, J. D. (1959). Turkey fertility. Circ. Calif. agric. Exp. Sta. Serv. No. 472, 28 pp.
   Google Scholar
• LORENZ, F. W. and LERNER, I. M. (1946). Inheritance of sexual maturity in chickens and turkeys. Poult. Sci. 25: 188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCARTNEY, M. G. (1951). The physiology of reproduction in turkeys. I. Effect of method of mating on fertility and hatchability. Poult. Sci. 30: 658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCARTNEY, M. G., CHAMBERLIN, V. D., CARTER, R. D. and WYNE, J. W. (1959). Factors affecting the artificial insemination of turkeys. Ohio agric. exp. Sta. Res. Circ. 76, 19 pp.
   Google Scholar
• MCNIEL, E. (1957). Pleuropneumonia-like organisms (PLLO) from the reproductive tract of birds. Poult. Sci. 36: 1140 abst.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOORE, O. K. and BYERLY, T. C. (1942). Relation of time of insemination to percent fertility. Poult. Sci. 21: 253.
   Google Scholar
• MOULTRIE, F. (1956). A new technique for the artificial insemination of caged hens. Poult. Sci. 35: 1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MUELLER, C. D. (1949). Artificial insemination for progeny test breeding. Poult. Sci. 28: 143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NISHIYAMA, H. (1952). Studies on the physiology of reproduction in the male fowl. III. On the addition of transparent fluid to the cock's semen. Sci. Bull. Fac. Agric. Kyshu Univ. 12: 269.
   Google Scholar
• NISHIYAMA, H. and OGAWA, K. (1961). On the function of the vascular body, an accessory reproductive organ of the cock. Jap. J. zootech. Sci. 32: 89. Anim. Breed. Abst. 30, No. 1377.
   Google Scholar
• PARADES, J. R. and GARCIA, T. P. (1959). Vitamin A as a factor affecting fertility in cockerels. Poult. Sci. 38: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARKER, J. E. (1945). Relation of time of day of artificial insemination to fertility and hatchability of hen's eggs. Poult. Sci. 24: 314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARKER, J. E. and McSPADDEN, B. J. (1943). Influence of feed reduction on fertility in male domestic fowls. Poult. Sci. 22: 170.
   Google Scholar
• PETERSON, E. H. HENDRIX, R. S. and WORDEN, C. E. (1959). Low fertility in turkeys associated with vibriosis. J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 135: 219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• POLGE, C. (1951a). Artificial insemination in the fowl. Proc. Soc. Study Fertil. 2: 16.
   Google Scholar
• POLGE, C. (1951b). Functional survival of fowl spermatozoa after freezing at –79°C. Nature (London) 167: 949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAEKI, Y. and BROWN, K. I. (1962). Effect of abnormal spermatozoa on fertility and hatchability in the turkey. Poult. Sci. 41: 1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHINDLER, H., BORNSTEIN, S., MOSES, E. and GABRIEL, I. (1957). Fertilization rate of chickens inseminated while containing a hard-shelled egg in their uterus. Ktavim Rec. agric. res. Sta. 8: 58.
   Google Scholar
• SCHINDLER, H., BORNSTEIN, S., MOSES, E. and GABRIEL, I. (1958). Fertilization rate of chickens inseminated in the afternoon or evening. Ktavim Rec. agric. res. Sta. 9: 287.
   Google Scholar
• SCHINDLER, H., WEINSTEIN, S., MOSES, E. and GABRIEL, I. (1955). The effect of various diluents and storage times on the fertilizing capacity of cock semen. Poult. Sci. 34: 1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHAFFNER, C. S. and ANDREWS, F. N. (1948). The influence of thiouracil on semen quality in the fowl. Poult. Sci. 27: 91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKALLER, F. (1951). Artificial insemination applied on a large scale to poultry breeding research. Off. Rep. 9th World's Poult. Congr. (Paris) 1951, 124.
   Google Scholar
• STOTTS, C. E. and DARROW, M. I. (1955). Application of artificial insemination in turkey breeder flocks. Poult. Sci. 34: 508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TANEJA, G. C. and GOWE, R. S. (1960). Relationship between the dose of undiluted semen and the duration of fertility in chickens. Poult. Sci. 39: 1298 abst.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TANEJA, G. C. and GOWE, R. S. (1961). The interrelationship between spermatozoa number and the volume of fluid inseminated on fertility and hatchability in the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 40: 1464 abst.
   Google Scholar
• TAYLOR, L. W., GUNNS, C. A., GRAU, C. R., and LEPKOVSKY, S. (1953). The effect of a respiratory disease on reproduction. Poult. Sci. 32: 129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THUMIN, A. (1951). Improvement in the technique of artificial insemination of chickens. Off. Rep. 9th World's Poult. Congr. (Paris) 1951, 154.
   Google Scholar
• TULLOCH, B. R. (1962). A modified technique for the collection of poultry semen. S. Afr. J. agric. Sci. 5: 153.
   Google Scholar
• WHEELER, R. S. (1948). A one-man technique for collecting cock semen. Poult. Sci. 27: 523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILCOX, F. H. and CLARK, R. G. (1961). Chicken-quail hybrids. J. Hered. 52: 167. Anim. Breed. Abst. 30: No. 1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WOODARD, A. E., ABPLANALP, H. and OGASAWARA, F. X. (1961). Egg and semen production performance of turkeys under cage management. Poult. Sci. 40: 884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WYNE, J. W., CARTER, R. D., McCARTNEY, M. G. and CHAMBERLIN, V. D. (1959). Relation of time of insemination to fertility in the turkey. Poult. Sci. 38: 828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar