LITERATURE CITED

• ARBOLEDA, C. R., 1971. Economic feasibility of measuring feed consumption in a poultry breeding operation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• ARBOLEDA, C. R., A. W. NORDSKOG, and D. L. HARRIS,, 1971. Economic feasibility of measuring feed consumption in a poultry breeding operation. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 50: 1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BALLOUN, S. L., and G. M. SPEERS,, 1969. Protein requirements of laying hens as affected by strain. Poultry Sci. 48(4): 1175–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEGIN, J. J.,, 1967. The relation of breed and sex of chickens to the utilization of energy. Poultry Sci. 46: 379–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEGIN, J. J.,, 1968. A comparison of the ability of the Japanese quail and light breed chicken to metabolize and utilize energy. Poultry Sci. 47(4): 1278–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERNIER, P. E., and G. H. ARSCOTT,, 1960. Relative efficiency of sex-linked dwarf layers and their normal sisters (Abst.). Poultry Sci. 39: 1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERNIER, P. E., and G. H. ARSCOTT,, 1966. Growth and feed requirements of dwarf White Leghorn pullets as compared to their normal-sized sisters (Abst.). Poultry Sci. 45: 1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIRD, S., and J. W. SINCLAIR,, 1939. Economic aspects of poultry keeping in Canada with special reference to egg production. Sci. Agr. 19: 551–564.
   Google Scholar
• BRODY, S.,, 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Rheinhold Publishing Corp., New York.
   Google Scholar
• BRODY, S., E. M. FUNK, and H. L. KEMPSTER,, 1938. Growth and development: XLIV Energetic efficiency of egg production and the influence of live weight thereon. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 278.
   Google Scholar
• BYERLY, T. C.,, 1967. Efficiency of feed conversion. Science 157: 890–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BYERLY, T. C.,, 1941. Feed and other costs of producing market eggs. Maryland Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. Al.
   Google Scholar
• CALVERLY, C. E., L. S. PALMER, and C. KENNEDY,, 1946. Genetic differences in the biochemistry and physiology influencing food utilization for growth in rats. I. Balance of nitrogen and energy during growth and carcass composition of two strains of rats differing in efficiency of food utilization. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 176: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• CASEY, D. W.,, 1970. Estimation of performance efficiency in the laying hen. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• CASEY, D. W., and A. W. NORDSKOG,, 1971. Genetic variability and predicted selection responses for egg production efficiency. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 50: 1562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DICKERSON, G. E., and J. C. GRIMES,, 1947. Effectiveness of selection for efficiency of gain in Duroc swine. J. of Anim. Sci. 6: 265–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUKES, H. H.,, 1937. Studies on energy metabolism of the hen. J. of Nutr. 14: 341–354.
   Google Scholar
• FOX, T. W., and B. B. BOHREN,, 1954. An analysis of feed efficiency among breeds of chickens and its relationship to rate of growth. Poultry Sci. 33: 549–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FREEMAN, B. M.,, 1963. The gaseous metabolism of the domestic chicken. III. The oxygen requirements of the chicken during the period of rapid growth. Brit. Poultry Sci. 4: 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• FRENCH, H. L., A. W. NORDSKOG, and S. L. BALLOUN,, 1967. Comparison of feed consumption for body maintenance of cocks with hens. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 46: 1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRENCH, H. L.,, 1969. Differences in feed efficiency between Leghorn lines selected for large and small body size. Unpublished M.S. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• FRENCH, H. L.,, 1971. Importance of major gene effects on quantitative traits in the fowl. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• FRENCH, H. L., and A. W. NORDSKOG,, 1971. Feed conversion of dwarf chickens compared to normal small-bodied chickens. (Abst.) Poultry Sci. 50: 1577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLAZENER, E. W., and M. A. JULL,, 1946. Feed utilization in growing chickens in relation to shank length. Poultry Sci. 25: 355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUILLAUME, J.,, 1969. Consequences de I'introduction du gene de nanisme dw sur l'utilization alimentaire chez le poussin femelle. Annals de Biologie, Animale, Biochemie, Biophysique 9: 369–378.
   Google Scholar
• HESS, C. W., T. C. BYERLY, and M. A. JULL,, 1941. The efficiency of feed utilization by Barred Plymouth Rock and crossbred broilers. Poultry Sci. 20: 210–216.
   Google Scholar
• HESS, C. W., and M. A. JULL,, 1948. A study of the inheritance of feed utilization efficiency in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci. 27: 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOSHI, B. C., C. S. SHAFFNER, and M. A. JULL,, 1949. Efficiency of feed utilization in relation to body weight and egg production. Poultry Sci. 28: 301–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KLEIBER, M.,, 1932. Body size and metabolism. Hilgardie 6: 315–353.
   Google Scholar
• KLEIBER, M.,, 1947. Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol. Rev. 27: 511–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KLEIBER, M.,, 1950. Physiological meaning of regression equations. J. of Appl. Physiol. 2: 417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KLEIBER, M.,, 1961. The Fire of Life—an introduction to animal energetics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
   Google Scholar
• KNAPP, B., and A. L. BAKER,, 1944. Correlation between rate and efficiency of gain in steers. J. of Anim. Sci. 3: 219–223.
   Google Scholar
• KOCH, R. M., L. A. SWIGER, D. CHAMBERS, and K. E. GREGORY,, 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. of Anim. Sci. 22(2): 486–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KONDRA, P. A., and G. C. HODGSON,, 1961. Genetic differences in energy protein requirements of chicks. Poultry Sci. 40: 525–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEIGHTON, A. T. Jr., P. B. SIEGEL, and H. S. SIEGEL,, 1966. Body weight and surface area of chickens (Gallus domesticus). Growth 30: 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• MAGEE, W.T.,, 1962. Relationship between daily feed consumption and feed efficiency. J. of Anim. Sci. 21: 880–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAIJALA, K.,, 1966. Repeatabilities and correlations of economic traits in the Finnish random sample egg-laying test. Ann. Agr. Fenn. 5: 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• MCCARTNEY, M. G., and M. A. JULL,, 1948. Efficiency of feed utilization in New Hampshires to ten weeks. Poultry Sci. 27: 17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCNALLY, N. H., and W. H. FOSTER,, 1969. The relatioionship between financial margin and biological traits for nationally and internationally known entries in the 4th and 5th Gosford, R.S. tests. Brit. Poultry J. 10: 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MELLEN, W. J.,, 1963. Body size and metabolic rate in the domestic fowl. Agr. Sci. Rev. 1: 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• MERAT, P.,, 1969. Etude d'un gene de nanisme lie au sexe chez la poule. 1. Description sommaire et performances. Annales de Genet. Selection Anim. 1: 19–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MILLER, M. M., and J. H. QUISENBERRY,, 1959. Factors affecting feed efficiency for egg production in selected strains of caged layers. Poultry Sci. 38: 757–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MITCHELL, H. H., L. E. CARD, and W. T. HAINES,, 1927. The effect of age, sex and castration on basal heat production of chickens. J. Agr. Res. 34: 945–960.
   Google Scholar
• MOHAMMADIAN, M.,, 1969. Physiological effects of the sex-linked dwarfing gene, dw, in broilers (Abst.). Poultry Sci. 48: 1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, H. P., L. S. PALMER, and C. KENNEDY,, 1933. Fundamental food requirements for the growth of the rat. VII. An experimental study of inheritance as a factor influencing food utilization in the rat. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 92.
   Google Scholar
• NORDSKOG, A. W.,, 1960. Importance of egg size and other factors in determining net income in random sample tests. Poultry Sci. 39: 327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NORDSKOG, A. W., and M. FESTING,, 1962. Selection and correlated responses in the fowl. 12th World's Poultry Cong. Proc. 2: 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• NORDSKOG, A. W., H. L. FRENCH, and S. L. BALLOUN,, 1969. Direct versus indirect estimation of feed efficiency as a measure of performance. Poultry Sci. 48: 1303–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEREK, M., and F. SULMAN,, 1945. The basal metabolic rate in molting and laying hens. Endocrinology 36: 240–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PROD'HOMME, J., and P. MERAT,, 1969. Etude d'un gene de nanisme lie au sexe dhez la poule. III. Conteneur en calcium de la ration. Annales de Genet. Selection Anim. 1: 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• RAHNEFELD, G. W., R. E. COMSTOCK, W. J. BOYLAN and SINGH, 1965. Genetic correlation between growth rate and feed per unit gain in mice. J. of Anim. Sci. 24(4): 1061–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SELVARAJAH, R., F. N. JEROME, J. D. SUMMERS, and B. S. REINHART,, 1970. Some effects on sex-linked dwarfism in layer-type fowls. Poultry Scil. 49: 1142–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLINGER, S. J., I. R. SIBBALD, and W. F. PEPPER,, 1964. The relative abilities of two breeds of chickens and two varieties of turkeys to metabolize dietary nitrogen. Poultry Sci. 43: 329–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STURKIE, P. D.,, 1965. Avian physiology. Second ed. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
   Google Scholar