2
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Genetic Factors Affecting Egg Shell Quality

FACTEURS GÉNÉTIQUES AFFECTANT LA QUALITÉ DES COQUILLES D'OEUFS

ERBLICHE EINFLÜSSE AUF DIE EISCHALENQUALITÄT

Pages 75-84 | Published online: 25 Sep 2019

References

  • ANDERSON, G. B., T. C. CARTER and R. MORLEY JONES, (1970). Some factors affecting the incidence of cracks in hens' egg shells. British Poultry Science 11: 103.
  • ASMUNDSON, V. S. and G. A. BAKER, (1940). Percentage shell as a function of shell thickness, egg volume, and egg shape. Poultry Science. 19: 227.
  • BENNETT, G. L., G. E. DICKERSON and T. S. KASHYAP, (1981). Effectiveness of Progeny-test index selection for field performance of strain cross layers, II predicted and realized responses. Poultry Science. 60: 22.
  • BROOKS, J. and H. P. HALE, (1955). Strength of the shell of the hen's egg. Nature (London) 175: 848.
  • BUNK, M. J. and G. F. COMBS JR. (1979). Use of low viscosity epoxy plastic casts to study mammillary core and mammillary knob organization of avian egg shells. Poultry Science. 58: 1340.
  • BUSS, E. G. (1980). Personal Communication.
  • BUSS, E. G. (1981a). Which eggs break and why? I Penn. State Univ. Poult. Sales & Service conference.
  • BUSS, E. G. (1981b). genetic differences in egg shell formation. Symposium on Egg shell quality, 70th annual meeting, Poultry Science Association, Vancouver, B.C.
  • BUSS, E. G., R. M. LEACH JR. and J. T. STOUT, (1977). Egg shell quality for chickens and selected lines, f1's and f2's. Poultry Science. 56: 1699.
  • BUSS, E. G. and J. T. STOUT, (1981). Shell deposition rates in birds selected for thick and thin egg shell production. Poultry Science. 60: 477.
  • CARTER, T. C. (1970). Why do egg shells crack? World's Poultry Science Journal. 26: 549.
  • CARTER, T. C. (1971). The hen's egg: shell cracking and oviposition in battery cages and its inheritance. British Poultry Science. 12: 259.
  • COMBS, G. F. JR. (1980). Personal Communication.
  • EMSLEY, A., G. E. DICKERSON, and T. S. KASHYAP, (1977). Genetic parameters in progeny-test selection for field performance or strain-cross layers. Poultry Science. 56: 121.
  • GARWOOD, V. A., P. C. LOWE, and C. G. HAUGH, (1979). Method for improving egg shell strength by selection. British Poultry Science. 20: 289.
  • GOWE, R S., and R. W. FAIRFULL, (1980). Performance of six long-term multi-trait selected leghorn strains and three control strains, and a strain cross evaluation of the selected strains. Proc. 1980 South Pacific Poultry Science Convention. 141.
  • GRUNDER, A. A., R. B. GUYER, E. G. BUSS, and C. O. CLAGETT, (1980a). Calcium binding proteins in serum: quantitative differences between thick and thin shell lines of chickens. Poultry Science. 59: 880.
  • GRUNDER, A. A., R. B. GUYER, E. G. BUSS, and C. O. CLAGETT, (1980b). Effects of estradiol on calcium and calcium binding in serum of thick and thin-shell lines of chickens. Poultry Science. 59: 2776.
  • HAMILTON, R. M. G., K. G. HOLLANDS, P. W. VOISEY, and A. A. GRUNDER, (1979). Relationship between egg shell quality and shell breakage and factors that affect shell breakage in field—a review. World's Poultry Science Journal. 35: 177.
  • HARTMANN, W., G. HEIL, and H. W. RAUCH, (1981). Formation of lines differing in egg shell quality traits to investigate their relevance for the frequency of broken eggs. Proc. 1st European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs. Spelderholt Institute for Poultry Research 271.
  • HUNTON, P. (1962) Genetics of egg shell colour in a light sussex flock. British Poultry Science. 3: 189.
  • HUNTON, P. (1964). Genetics of egg shell colour: covariance with egg numbers and egg size. British Poultry Science. 5: 45.
  • HUNTON, P. (1969). The measurement of egg shell strength: a comparison of four methods. British Poultry Science. 10: 281.
  • KASHYAP, T. S., G. E. DICKERSON, and G. L. BENNETT, (1981). Effectiveness of Progeny-test multiple-trait index selection for field performance of strain-cross layers I estimated responses. Poultry Science. 60: 1.
  • KINNEY, T. B. JR. (1969). A summary of reported estimates of heritabilities and of genetic and phenotypic correlations for traits of chickens, U.S.D.A. Agricultural Handbook. No. 363.
  • OSBORNE, R. (1970). Selection responses in a commercial breeding strain of egg layers. Proc 14th World's Poultry Congress. 2: 163.
  • POGGENPOEL, D. G., D. J. Van PAPENDORP, and M. Van ZYL, (1980). Two-way selection for egg specific gravity. Poultry Bulletin (South Africa) December 1980. 357.
  • POTTS, P. L. and K. W. WASHBURN, (1974). Shell evaluation of white and brown egg strain by deformation, breaking strength, shell thickness and specific gravity. 1. Relationship to egg characteristics. Poultry Science. 53: 1123.
  • SCHOORL, P. and H. Y. BOERSMA, (1962). Research on the quality of the egg shell. A new method of determination. Proc. 12th World Poultry Congress 432.
  • SIMONS, P. C. M. (1971). Ultrastructure of the hen egg shell and its physiological interpretation. Agricultural Research reports (Versl.landbouwk. Onderz.). 758.
  • SIMONS, P. C. M. and G. WIERTZ, (1970). Notes on shell and membranes of the hen's eggs: a study with the scanning electron microscope, Annales de Biologie animale, Biochimie, Biophysique. 10: 31.
  • TAYLOR, L W., and I. M. LERNER, (1939). Inheritance of egg shell thickness in white leghorn pullets. Journal of Agricultural Research. 58: 383.
  • TYLER, C. and F. H. GEAKE, (1958). Studies on egg shells IV. The Influence of individuality, breed, and season on certain characteristics of egg shells from pullets. Journal of Science Food Agriculture 9: 473.
  • U.S.D.A., Report on Random Sample Egg Production Tests, U.S. and Canada, 1963-1978.
  • Van TIJEN, W. F. (1977a). Shell quality in poultry as seen from the breeders view-point 2. Search for heterosis effects. Poultry Science. 56: 11115.
  • Van TIJEN, W. F. (1977b). Shell quality in poultry as seen from the breeders view-point 3. Heritabilities: Expected versus accomplished response. Poultry Science. 56: 1121.
  • Van TIJEN, W. F. (1977c). Shell quality in poultry as seen from the breeders view-point 1. Improvement reached after four years of selection and the effect on productivity. Poultry Science. 56: 2111.
  • Van TIJEN, W. F., and A. R. KUIT, (1970). The heritability of characteristics of egg quality, their mutal correlation and the relationship with productivity. Archiv für Geflügelkunde. 34: 201.
  • Van TOLEDO, B., A. H. PARSONS, and G. F. COMBS, JR. (1980). Mammillary structure as a determinant of egg shell strength. Poultry Science 59: 1667.
  • VOISEY, P. W. (1975). Field comparison of two instruments for measuring shell deformation to estimate egg shell strength. Poultry Science. 54: 190.
  • VOISEY, P. W., and R. M. G. HAMILTON, (1976a). Notes on the measurement of egg specific gravity to estimate shell quality. Engineeting Research Service, Agriculture Canada, Report 7322-598.
  • VOISEY, P. W., and R. M. G. HAMILTON, (1976b). Prediction of egg shell thickness and stength by ultrasonic measurements. Engineering Research Service Agriculture Canada, Report 7502-576.
  • WOOD-GUSH, D. G. M., and A. B. GILBERT, (1969). Observations of the laying behaviour of hens in battery cages. British Poultry Science. 10: 29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.