2
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Review of the Efficacy and Mechanism of Competitive Exclusion for The Control of Salmonella in Poultry

UNE REVUE SUR L'EFFICACITE ET LE MECANISME DE L'EXCLUSION COMPETITIVE POUR LE CONTROLE DES SALMONELLES CHEZ LES VOLAILLES

EIN ÜBERBLICK ÜBER WIRKUNGSGRAD UND MECHANISMUS DER AUSSCHLUßMETHODE FÜR DIE KONTROLLE VON SALMONELLEN BEI GEFLÜGEL

Pages 72-83 | Published online: 23 Sep 2019

References

  • ADLER, H. E. and DAMASSA, A. J. (1980). Effect of ingested lactobacilli on Salmonella infantis and Escherichia coli and on intestinal flora, pasted vents and chick growth. Avian Diseases 24: 868.
  • ANONYMOUS. (1976). The National Poultry Improvement Plan and Auxilliary Provisions. NPIP Staff, USDA, ARS, Beltsville, Maryland.
  • ANONYMOUS. (1982). Salmonella surveillance, annual summary 1980. Centers of Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • BARE, L. N. and WISEMAN, R. F. (1964). Delayed appearance of lactobacilli in the intestines of chicks reared in a “new” environment. Applied Microbiology 12: 457.
  • BARNES, E. M., IMPEY, C. S. and COOPER, D. M. (1980a). Competitive exclusion of salmonellas from the newly hatched chick. Veterinary Record 160: 61.
  • BARNES, E. M., IMPEY, C. S. and COOPER, D. M. (1980b). Manipulation of the crop and intestinal flora of the newly hatched chick. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33: 2426.
  • BARNES, E. M., IMPEY, C. S. and STEVENS, J. H. (1979). Factors affecting the incidence and anti-salmonella activity of the anaerobic caecal flora of the young chick. Journal of Hygiene 82: 263.
  • BARNES, E. M., MEAD, G. C., BARNUM, D. A. and HARRY, E. G. (1972). The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. British Poultry Science 13: 311.
  • BHATIA, T. R. S. and McNABB, G. D. (1980). Dissemination of salmonella in broiler-chicken operations. Avian Diseases 24: 616.
  • BLANCHFIELD, B., GARDINER, M. A. and PIVNICK, H. (1982). Nurmi concept for preventing infection of chicks by salmonella: Comparison of faecal suspensions and faecal cultures administered into the crop and in the drinking water. Journal of Food Protection 45: 345.
  • BONHOFF, M., MILLER, C. P. and MARTIN, W. R. (1964). Resistance of the mouse's intestinal tract to experimental salmonella infection. 1. Factors which interfere with the initiation of infection by oral inoculation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 120: 805.
  • BROWNELL, J. R., SADLER, W. W. and FANELLI, M. J. (1970). Role of caeca in intestinal infection of chickens with Salmonella typhimurium. Avian Diseases 14: 106.
  • COSTERTON, J. W., GEESEY, G. G. and CHENG, K. J. (1978). How bacteria stick. Scientific American. 238: 86.
  • FARNER, D. S. (1943). Gastric hydrogen ion concentration and acidity in the domestic fowl. Poultry Science 22: 79.
  • FULLER, R. (1977). Epithelial attachment and other factors controlling the colonization of the intestine of the gnotobiotic chicken by lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 45: 389.
  • FULLER, R. (1977). The importance of lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in the crop. British Poultry Science 18: 85.
  • FULLER, R. and BROOKER, B. E. (1974). Lactobacilli which attach to the crop epithelium of the fowl. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 27: 1305.
  • FULLER, R. and TURVEY, A. (1971). Bacteria associated with the intestinal wall of the fowl (Gallus domesticus). Journal of Applied Bacteriology 34: 617.
  • HALL, W. J. (1965). Fowl Typhoid. In Diseases of Poultry, 5th ed. (eds. H. E. Biester and L. H. Schwarte). pp. 329–330. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
  • IMPEY, C. S., MEAD, G. C. and GEORGE, S. M. (1982). Competitive exclusion of salmonellas from the chick caecum using a defined mixture of bacterial isolates from the caecal microflora of an adult bird. Journal of Hygiene. 89: 479.
  • JAYNE-WILLIAMS, D. J. and FULLER, R. (1971). The influence of the intestinal microflora on nutrition. In Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl. Vol. 1. (ed. D. J. Bell and B. M. Freeman). pp. 74–92. Academic Press, London, England.
  • LAFONT, J. P., BREE, A., NACIRI, M., YVORE, P., GUILLOT, J. F. and CHASLUSDANCLA, E. (1983). Experimental study of some factors limiting competitive exclusion of salmonella in chickens. Research in Veterinary Science 34: 16.
  • LLOYD, A. B., CUMMING, R. B. and KENT, R. D. (1977). Prevention of Salmonella typhimurium infection in poultry by pretreatment of chickens and poults with intestinal extracts. Australian Veterinary Journal 53: 82.
  • MEAD, G. C. and ADAMS, B. W. (1975). Some observations on the caecal micro-flora of the chick during the first two weeks of life. British Poultry Science 16: 169.
  • MEYNELL, G. G. (1963). Antibacterial mechanisms of the mouse gut. II: The role of volatile fatty acids in the normal gut. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 44: 209.
  • MILNER, K. C. and SCHAFFER, M. F. (1952). Bacteriologic studies of experimental salmonella infections in chicks. Journal of Infectious Disease 90: 81.
  • NURMII, E. and RANTALA, M. (1973). New aspects of salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241: 210.
  • PIVNICK, H., BLANCHFIELD, B. and D'AOUST, J. Y. (1981). Prevention of salmonella infection in chicks by treatment with faecal cultures from mature chickens (Nurmi cultures). Journal of Food Protection. 44: 909.
  • RAEVUORI, M., SEUNA, E. And NURMI, E. (1978). An epidemic of Salmonella infantis infection in Finnish Broiler chickens in 1975–76. Acta Veterinari Scand. 19: 317.
  • RANTALA, M. (1974). Cultivation of a bacterial flora able to prevent the colonization of Salmonella infantis in the intestines of broiler chickens, and its use. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scand. 82: 75.
  • RANTALA, M. (1974). Nitrovin and tetracycline: A comparison of their effect on salmonellosis in chicks. British Poultry Science 15: 299.
  • RANTALA, M. and NURMI, E. (1973). Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. British Poultry Science 14: 627.
  • RANTALA, M. and NURMI, E. (1974). Hazards involved in the use of furazolidone for the prevention of salmonellosis in broiler chickens. Journal of Hygiene 72: 349.
  • REID, C. R. and BARNUM, D. A. (1983). Evaluation of turkey caecal microflora in protecting day-old poults from Salmonella typhimurium challenge. Avian Diseases 27: 632.
  • RIGBY, C. E. and PETTIT, J. R. (1980). Observations on competitive exclusion for preventing. Salmonella typhimurium infection of broiler chickens. Avian Diseases 24: 604.
  • ROYAL, W. A. and MUTIMER, M. D. (1972). Inhibition of Salmonella typimurium by fowl caecal cultures. Research in Veterinary Science 13: 184.
  • SADLER, W. W., BROWNELL, J. R. and FANELLI, M. J. (1969). Influence of age and inoculum level on shed patterns of Salmonella typhimurium in chicks. Avian Diseses 13: 793.
  • SAVAGE, D. C. (1972). Survival on mucosal epithelia, epithelial penetration and growth in tissue of pathogenic bacteria. In Microbial Pathogenicity in Man and Animals. (ed. H. Smith and J. H. Pearce), pp. 25–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  • SCHNEITZ, C., SEUNA, E. and RIZZO, A. (1981). The anaerobically cultured caecal flora of adult fowls that protects chickens from salmonella infections. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scand. 89: 109.
  • SEUNA, E. (1979). Sensitivity of young chickens to Salmonella typhimurium var. copenhagen and S. infantis infection and the preventive effect of cultured intestinal microflora. Avian Diseases 23: 392.
  • SEUNA, E., RAEVUORE, M. and NURMI, E. (1978). An epizootic of Salmonella typhimurium var. copenhagen in broilers and the use of cultured chicken intestinal flora for its control. British Poultry Science 19: 308–314.
  • SEUNA, E., SCHNEIZ, C., NURMI, E. and MAKELA, P. H. (1980). Combined therapy of salmonella infection in chickens by antimicrobial agents followed by cultured caecal material. Poultry Science 59: 1187.
  • SILVA, E. N., SNOEYENBOS, G. H., WEINACK, O. M. and SMYSER, C. F. (1981). The influence of native gut microflora on the colonization and infection of Salmonella gallinarum in chickens. Avian Diseases 25: 68.
  • SNOEYENBOS, G. H., SOERJADI, A. S. and WEINACK, O. M. (1982). Gastro-intestinal colonization by salmonellae and pathogenic Escherichia coli in monoxenic and holoxenic chicks and poults. Avian Diseases 26: 566.
  • SNOEYENBOS, G. H., WEINACK, O. M. and SMYSER, C. F. (1978). Protecting chicks from salmonellae by oral administration of “normal” gut microflora. Avian Diseases 22: 273.
  • SNOEYENBOS, G. H., WEINACK, O. M. and SMYSER, C. F. (1979). Further studies on competitive exclusion for controlling salmonellae in chickens. Avian Diseases 24: 904.
  • SOERJADI, A. S., LLOYD, E. and SUMMING, R. B. (1978). Streptococus faecalis, a bacterial isolate which protects young chickens from enteric invasion by salmonellae. Australian Veterinary Journal 54: 549.
  • SOERJADI, A. S., FURNER, R., SNOELYENBOS, G. H. and WEINACK, O. M. (1982). Adherence of salmonellae and native gut microflora to the gastrointestinal mucosa of chicks. Avian Diseases 26: 576.
  • SOERJADI, A. S., STEHMAN, S. M., SNOEYENBOS, G. H., WEINACK, O. M. and SMYSER, C. F. (1981a). Some measurements of protection against paratyphoid salmonella and Escherichia coli by competitive exclusion in chickens. Avian Diseases 25: 706.
  • SOERJADI, A. S., STEHMAN, S. M., SNOEYENBOS, G. H., WEINACK, O. M. and SMYSER, C. F. (1981b). The influence of lactobacilli on the competitive exclusion of paratyphoid salmonellae in chickens. Avian Diseases 25: 1027.
  • STERSKY, A., BLANCHFIELD, B., THACKER, C. and PIVNICK, H. (1981). Reduction of Salmonella excretion into drinking water following treatment of chicks with Numri culture. Journal of Food Protection 44: 917.
  • TODD, E. C. D. (1980). Poultry-associated foodborne disease—its occurrence, cost, source and prevention. Journal of Food Protection 43: 129.
  • TURNBULI, P. C. B. and RICHMOND, J. E. (1978). A model of salmonella enteritis: The behaviour of Salmonella enteritidis in chick intestine studied by light and electron microscopy. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 59: 64.
  • VAN ROEKEL, H. (1965). Pullorum Disease. In Diseases of Poultry, 5th ed. (ed. H. E. Biester and L. H. Schwarte), pp. 220–221. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
  • WATKINS, B. A. and MILLER, B. F. (1983). Competitive gut exclusion of avian pathogens by Lactobacillus acidophilus in gnotobiotic chicks. Poultry Science 62: 1772.;
  • WEINACK, O. M., SNOEYENBOS, G. H. and SMYSER, C. F. (1979). A supplemental test system to measure competitive exclusion of salmonellae by native microflora in the chicken gut. Avian Diseases 24: 1019.
  • WEINACK, O. M., SNOEYENBOS, G. H., EMYSER, C. F. And SOERJADI, A. S. (1981). Competitive exclusion of intestinal colonization of Escherichia coli in chicks. Avian Diseases 25: 696.
  • WEINACK, O. M., SNOEYENBOS, G. H., SMYSER, C. F. and SOERJADI, A. S. (1982). Reciprocal competitive exclusion of salmonella and Escherichia coli by native intestinal microflora of the chicken and turkey. Avian Diseases 26: 585.
  • WILLIAMS, J. E. (1965). Paratyphoid and Arizona infections. In Diseases of Poultry, 5th ed. H. E. Biester, and I. H. Schwarte). pp. 260–261. Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa.
  • WILLIAMS, J. E. (1978). Paratyphoid infections. In Diseases of Poultry, 7th ed. (ed. M. S. Hofstad, B. W. Calnek, C. F. Helmboldt, W. M. Reid and H. W. Yoder, Jr.), pp. 145–161. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.