Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens

References

• ABEYESINGHE, S.M., NICOL, C.J., HARTNELL, S.J. and WATHES, C.M. (2005) Can domestic fowl show self-control? Animal Behaviour 70: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABRAHAMSSON, P. and TAUSSON, R. (1997) Effects of group size on performance, health and birds'use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A- Animal Science 47: 254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALBENTOSA, M.J. and COOPER, J.J. (2004) Effects of cage height and stocking density on the frequency of comfort behaviours performed by laying hens housed in furnished cages. Animal Welfare 13: 419–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C. (2004) What causes crowding? Effects of space, facilities and group size on behaviour, with particular reference to furnished cages for hens. Animal Welfare 13: 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C., DUNCAN, I.J.H. and McRAE, H.E. (1988) Perching and floor laying by domestic hens: experimental results and their commercial application. British Poultry Science 29: 351–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY M.C. and McRAE H.E. (1986) The individual nest box as a super-stimulus for domestic hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C., HUGHES, B.O. and ELSON, A. (1992) Poultry Production Systems: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. CAB International, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C. SMITH, S.F. and HUGHES, B.O. (1993) Nesting, dustbathing and perching by laying hens in cages – effects of design on behaviour and welfare. British Poultry Science 34: 835–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPLEBY, M.C., HUGHES, B.O., McDONALD, M. and CORDINER, L.S. (1998) Factors affecting the use of perches in cages by laying hens. British Poultry Science 39: 186–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLOKHUIS, H.J., BEUVING, G. and ROMMERS, J.M. (1993) Individual variation of stereotyped pecking in laying hens. In: C.J. Savory and B.O. Hughes (eds) Proceedings of the 4th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Edinburgh, UK, 18–21 September 1993. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UK. pp. 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• BLOKHUIS, H.J. and WIEPKEMA, P.R. (1998) Studies of feather pecking in poultry. Veterinary Quarterly 20: 6–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRAASTAD, B.O. (1990) Effects on behaviour and plumage of a key-stimuli floor and a perch in triple cages for laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRADSHAW, R.H. (1991) Discrimination of group members by laying hens Gallus domesticus. Behavioural Processes 24: 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRADSHAW, R.H. (1992) Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUBIER, N.E. (1996a) The behavioural priorities of laying hens: the effect of cost/no cost multi-choice tests on time budgets. Behavioural Processes 37: 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUBIER, N.E. (1996b) The behavioural priorities of laying hens: the effects of two methods of environment enrichment on time budgets. Behavioural Processes 37: 239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHANNING, C.E., HUGHES, B.O. and WALKER, A.W. (2001) Spatial distribution and behaviour of laying hens housed in an alternative system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 335–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and ALBENTOSA, M.J. (2003) Behavioural priorities of laying hens. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 14: 127–149.
   Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1995) The effects of experience on motivation: prelaying behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1996a) Demand for nest boxes in laying hens. Behavioural Processes 36: 171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1996b) Individual variation in pre-laying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggs in laying hens. British Poultry Science 37: 245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1997) Motivational aspects of individual variation in response to nest boxes by laying hens. Animal Behaviour 54: 1245–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOPER, J.J. and APPLEBY, M.C. (2003) The value of environmental resources to domestic hens: a comparison of the work-rate for food and for nests as a function of time. Animal Welfare 12: 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DANBURY T.C., WEEKS, C.A., CHAMBERS, J.P., WATERMAN-PEARSON, A.E and KESTIN, S.C. (2000) Preferential selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 146: 307–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAWKINS, M.S. (1985) Cage height preference and use in battery kept hens. Veterinary Record 116: 345–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAWKINS, M.S. (1989) Time budgets in red junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 77–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAWKINS, M.S. (2003) Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology 106: 383–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'EATH, R.B. and KEELING, L.J. (1998) Social discrimination by hens and small flocks: implications for social organisation. In: I. Veissier and A. Boissy (eds) Proceedings of the 32nd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 21–25 July 1998, Clermont-Ferrand, France. INRA, France. p. 68.
   Google Scholar
• DE JONG, I., FILLERUP, M. and VAN REENEN, K. (2005) Substrate preferences in laying hens. In: Proceedings of the 7th European symposium on poultry welfare, 15–19 June 2005 Lublin, Poland, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 23 Suppl. 1, 143–152. Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding Jastrz′biec Poland.
   Google Scholar
• DUNCAN, I.J.H. and HUGHES, B.O. (1972) Free and operant feeding in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 20: 775–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAURE, J.-M. (1986) Operant determination of the cage and feeder size preferences of the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAURE, J.-M. and JONES, R.B. (2004) Genetic influences on resource use, fear and sociality. In: G.C. Perry (Editor) ‘Welfare of the Laying Hen' Poultry Science Symposium Series 27, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• FAURE, J.-M., BESSEI, W. and JONES, R.B. (2003) Direct selection for improvement of animal well-being. In: W.M. Muir and S.E. Aggrey (editors) Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Technology, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• FREIRE, R., APPLEBY, M.C. and HUGHES, B.O. (1997a) The interaction between pre-laying behaviour and feeding in hens: Implications for motivation. Behaviour 134: 1019–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FREIRE, R., APPLEBY, M.C. and HUGHES, B.O. (1997b) Assessment of pre-laying motivation in the domestic hen using social interaction. Animal Behaviour 54: 313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FREIRE, R., CHENG H.W. and NICOL, C.J. (2004) Development of spatial memory in occlusion-experienced domestic chicks. Animal Behaviour 67: 141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FREIRE, R. and NICOL C. J. (1999) Effect of experience of occlusion events on the domestic chick's strategy for locating a concealed imprinting object. Animal Behaviour 58: 593–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRIGOR, P.N., HUGHES, B.O. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1995) Social inhibition of movement in domestic hens. Animal Behaviour 49: 1381–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUESDON, V. and FAURE, J.M. (2004) Laying performance and egg quality in hens kept in standard or furnished cages. Animal Research 53: 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• GUNNARSSON, S., MATTHEWS, L.R., FOSTER, T.M. and TEMPLE, W. (2000) The demand for straw and feathers as litter substrates by laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUBER-EICHER, B. and WECHSLER, B. (1998). The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 861–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUGHES, B.O. (1977) Selection of group size by individual laying hens. British Poultry Science 18: 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUGHES, B.O. and DUNCAN, I.J.H. (1988) The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 1696–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUGHES, B.O., DUNCAN, I.J.H. and BROWN, M. (1989) The performance of nest building by domestic hens: is it more important than the construction of the nest? Animal Behaviour 36: 327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUGHES, B.O., CARMICHAEL, N.L., WALKER, A.W. and GRIGOR, P.N. (1997) Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JENSEN, P. and TOATES, F. (1993) Who needs behavioural needs – motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 161–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DE JONG, I.C., FILLERUP, M. and VAN REENEN, K. (2005) Substrate preferences in laying hens. Animal Science Papers and Reports 23 Supplement 1: 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• LAGADIC, H. and FAURE, J-M. (1987) Preferences of domestic hens for cage size and floor types as measured by operant conditioning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19: 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAYWEL (2006) Report in preparation (may include publication on web).
   Google Scholar
• LINDBERG, A.C. and NICOL, C.J. (1996a) Effects of social and environmental familiarity on group preferences and spacing behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LINDBERG, A.C. and NICOL, C.J. (1996b) Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. British Poultry Science 37: 709–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LINDBERG, A.C. and NICOL, C.J. (1997) Dustbathing in modified battery cages: Is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LINDBERG, A.C. and NICOL, C.J. (2001) Influence of prior exposure to wood shavings on feather pecking, dustbathing and foraging in adult laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LINDQVIST, C.E.S., SCHUTZ, K.E. and JENSEN, P. (2002) Red junglefowl have more contra free-loading than white leghorn layers: effects of food deprivation and consequences for information gain. Behaviour 139: 1195–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEELING, L.J. (1994) Inter-bird distances and behavioural priorities in laying hens: the effect of spatial restriction. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEELING, L.J. (1995) Spacing behaviour and an ethological approach to assessing optimum space allocations for groups of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MASON, G., MCFARLAND, D and GARNER, J. (1998) A demanding task: Using economic techniques to assess animal priorities. Animal Behaviour 55: 1071–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MASON, G.J. COOPER, J.J. and CLAREBROUGH, C. (2001) Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410: 35–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATTHEWS, L.R., W. TEMPLE, W., FOSTER, T.M., WALKER, A.W. and MCADIE, T.M. (1995) Comparison of the demand for dustbathing substrates by layer hens, 29th International Congress of the ISAE, pp. 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• McLEAN, K.A., BAXTER, M.R. and MICHIE, W. (1986) A comparison of the welfare of laying hens in battery cages and in a perchery. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• MEIJSSER, F.M. and HUGHES, B.O. (1989) Comparative analysis of pre-laying behaviour in battery cages and in three alternative systems. British Poultry Science 30: 747–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MERRILL, R.J.N. (2004) Dustbathing behaviour of laying hens on novel materials in furnished cages. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• MOINARD, C. STATHAM, P., HASKELL, M.J., MCCORQUODALE, C., JONES, R.B. and GREEN, P.R. (2004) Accuracy of hens in jumping upwards and downwards between perches in different light environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85: 77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NG, Y.-K. (1990) The case for and difficulties in using “demand areas” to measure changes in well-being. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 30–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J. (1986) Non-exclusive spatial preference in the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J. (1987) Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 35: 1709–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J. (1997) Making sense of variation: acquired functional categories and conditional discriminations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 59–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J. and GUILFORD, T. (1991) Exploratory activity as a measure of motivation in deprived hens. Animal Behaviour 41: 333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J., GREGORY, N.G., KNOWLES, T.G., PARKMAN, I.D. and WILKINS, L.J. (1999) Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICOL, C.J., LINDBERG, A.C., PHILLIPS, A.J., POPE, S.J., WILKINS, L.J. and GREEN, L.E. (2001) Influences of prior exposure to wood shavings on feather pecking, dustbathing and foraging in adult laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OLSSON, I.A.S. and KEELING, L.J. (2000) Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAGEL, M. and DAWKINS, M.S. (1997) Peck orders and group size in laying hens: ‘Futures contracts’ for non-aggression. Behavioural Processes 40: 13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PETHERICK, J.C., and DUNCAN, I.J.H. (1989) Behaviour of young domestic fowl directed towards different substrates. British Poultry Science 30: 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PETHERICK, J.C., SEAWRIGHT, E. and WADDINGTON, D. (1993) Influence of motivational state on choice of food or a dustbathing foraging substrate by domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 28: 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANOTRA, G.S., VESTERGAARD, K.S., AGGER, J.F., et al. (1995) The relative preference for feathers, straw, wood-shavings and sand for dustbathing, pecking and scratching in domestic chicks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAVORY, J., JACK, M.C. and SANDILANDS, V. (2005) Behavioural responses of hens in pens to different floor space allowances. In: Proceedings of the 7th European symposium on poultry welfare, 15–19 June 2005, Lublin, Poland, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 23, Suppl 1, 135–141. Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrz′biec Poland.
   Google Scholar
• SCHUTZ, K.E. and JENSEN, P. (2001) Effects of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: A comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethology 107: 753–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHERWIN, C.M. and NICOL C.J. (1993) Factors influencing floor-laying by hens in modified cages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMITH, S.F., APPLEBY, M.C. and HUGHES, B.O. (1990) Problem solving by domestic hens opening doors to reach nest sites. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 287–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMITH, S.F., APPLEBY, M.C. and HUGHES, B.O. (1993) Nesting and dustbathing by hens in cages – matching and mismatching between behavior and environment. British Poultry Science 34: 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TAUSON, R. (2003) Experiences of production and welfare in small group furnished cages in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the XVI European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry and Meat & X European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, St Brieuc, France. ISAPIA, BP 7, 22440 Ploufragan, France, pp. 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• TAUSON, R. and ABRAHAMSSON, P. (1996) Foot and keel bone disorders in laying hens – Effects of artificial perch material and hybrid. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A- Animal Science 46: 239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TAUSON, R. and HOLM, K.-E. (2002) Evaluation of Victorsson furnished cage for 8 laying hens according to the 7§ of the Swedish Animal Welfare Ordinance and according to the New Technique Evaluation Program at the Swedish Board of Agriculture. Rapport 251. SLU, Funbo-Lövsta Forskningscenter, 755 97 UPPSALA. (Swedish, with English tables, graphs and summary)
   Google Scholar
• TAUSON, R. and HOLM, K.-E. (2003) Evaluation of “Aviplus” – Big Dutchman – furnished cage for 10 laying hens according to the 7§ of the Swedish Animal Welfare Ordinance and according to the New Technique Evaluation Program at the Swedish Board of Agriculture. Rapport 251. SLU, Funbo-Lövsta Forskningscenter, 755 97 UPPSALA. (Swedish, with English tables, graphs and summary).
   Google Scholar
• TAUSON, R. and HOLM, K.-E. (2005) Mortality, production and use of facilities in furnished cages for layers in commercial egg production in Sweden from 1998–2003. In: Proceedings of the 7th European symposium on poultry welfare, 15–19 June 2005, Lublin, Poland, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 23, Suppl 1, 95–102. Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrz′biec Poland.
   Google Scholar
• TAYLOR, P.E., SCOTT, G.B. and ROSE, P. (2003) The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects of light intensity and perch colour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 83: 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VALKONEN, E., VALAJA, J. and VENÄLÄINEN, E. (2005) The effects of dietary energy and perch design on the performance and condition of laying hens kept in furnished cages. In: Proceedings of the 7th European symposium on poultry welfare, 15–19 June 2005, Lublin, Poland, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 23, Suppl 1, 9103–110. Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrz′biec, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• VAN LIERE, D.W. (1991) Function and organization of dustbathing in laying hens. Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen (Thesis).
   Google Scholar
• VAN LIERE, D.W. (1992) Dustbathing as related to proximal and distal feather lipids in laying hens. Behavioural Processes 26: 177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN LIERE, D.W., KOOIJMAN, J. and WIEPKEMA, P.R. (1990) Dustbathing behaviour of laying hens as related to quality of dustbathing material. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN LIERE, D.W., and SIARD, N. (1991) The experience with litter and subsequent selection of bathing substrates in laying hens. In: M. C. Appleby, R. I. Horrell, J. C. Petherick, and S. M. Rutter (Eds.), Applied animal behaviour: past present and future, pp. 132–133. UFAW, Potters Bar, Herts.
   Google Scholar
• VAN LIERE, D.W. and WIEPKEMA, P.R. (1992) Effects of long-term deprivation of sand on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens. Animal Behaviour 43: 549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VESTERGAARD, K. (1982) Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl: diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 487–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VESTERGAARD, K. and HOGAN, J.A. (1992) The development of a behavior system – dustbathing in the Burmese Red Junglefowl.3 Effects of experience on stimulus preference. Behaviour 121: 215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VESTERGAARD, K. and LISBORG, L. (1993) A model of feather pecking development which relates to dustbathing in the fowl. Behaviour 126: 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VESTERGAARD, K.S., DAMM, B.I., ABBOTT, U.K. and BILDSOE, M. (1999) Regulation of dustbathing in feathered and featherless domestic chicks: the Lorenzian model revisited. Animal Behaviour 58: 1017–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WARBURTON, H. and MASON, G. (2003) Is out of sight out of mind? The effects of resource cues on motivation in mink, Mustela vison. Animal Behaviour 65: 755–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIDOWSKI, T.M. and Duncan, I.J.H. (2000) Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar