Why is there inconsistency in accounting for liabilities in IFRS? An analysis of recognition, measurement, estimation and conservatism

References

• Archer, G. and Peasnell, K., 1985. Current cost of a quoted long-term liability: a comment. Accounting and Business Research, 15 (58), 87–90. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1985.9729250
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R. and Shivakumar, L., 2005. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research, 44 (2), 207–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., 2004. Reporting financial performance. Accounting Horizons, 18 (2), 157–172. doi: 10.2308/acch.2004.18.2.157
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M., 2006. Including estimates of the future in today's financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 20 (3), 271–285. doi: 10.2308/acch.2006.20.3.271
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1), 3–37. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, W.T., 1975. Accounting Values and Inflation. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, W.H., 1989. Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, W.H., 1991. Problems and paradoxes in the financial reporting of future events. Accounting Horizons, 5 (4), 122–134.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, W.H. and Demski, J.S., 1974. The nature of financial accounting objectives: a summary and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Research 12, 170–187. doi: 10.2307/2490504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston, G., Carmichael, D., Demski, J., Dharan, D., Jamal, K., Laux, R., Rajgopal, S., and Vrana, S., 2007. The FASB's conceptual framework for financial reporting: a critical analysis. Accounting Horizons, 21 (2), 229–238. doi: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.229
   Google Scholar
• Botosan, C., Koonce, L., Ryan, S., Stone, M., and Wahlen, J., 2005. Accounting for liabilities: conceptual issues, standard setting, and evidence from academic research. Accounting Horizons, 19 (3), 159–186. doi: 10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.159
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 1964. Measurement and objectivity in accounting. Accounting Review, 39 (2), 264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 1965. Measurement in accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 3 (1), 32–62. doi: 10.2307/2490049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 1998. Wanted: foundations of accounting measurement. Abacus, 34 (1), 36–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00021
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., 2010a. Conceptual frameworks of accounting from an information perspective. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 287–299. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., 2010b. Accounting errors and errors of accounting. Accounting Review, 85 (6), 1827–1838. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.1827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, E.O. and Bell, P.W., 1961. The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG, ANC, ASCG, OIC and FRC, 2013a. Getting a Better Framework: Uncertainty. Brussels: EFRAG.
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG, ANC, ASCG, OIC and FRC, 2013b. Getting a Better Framework: Prudence. Brussels: EFRAG.
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG, ANC, ASCG, OIC and FRC, 2013c. Getting a Better Framework: Reliability of Financial Information. Brussels: EFRAG.
   Google Scholar
• FASB, 2006. A Roadmap for Convergence between IFRSs and US GAAP – 2006–2008: Memorandum of Understanding between the FASB and the IASB. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Gassen, J. and Schwedler, K., 2010. The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review, 19 (3), 495–509. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.496548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, G., 2012. Financial instruments in non-financial firms: what do we know? Accounting and Business Research, 42 (3), 267–289. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2012.681859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D., 1989. Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18 (2), 141–153. doi: 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B., Tahoun, A., and Walker, M., 2011. Do cross-country differences in accounting conservatism explain variation in the degree of investor international diversification. Working Paper, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J., Ijiri, Y., Levine, C., and Liang, P., 2005. Separating facts from forecasts in financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 19 (4), 267–282. doi: 10.2308/acch.2005.19.4.267
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., 2003. Revisiting Fair value accounting – measuring commercial banks’ liabilities. Abacus, 39 (2), 250–261. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.t01-1-00129
   Google Scholar
• Hitz, J.-M., 2007. The decision usefulness of fair value accounting – a theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review, 16 (2), 323–362. doi: 10.1080/09638180701390974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J., Macve, R., and Serafeim, G., 2011. Deprival value vs fair value measurement for contract liabilities in resolving the revenue recognition conundrum: towards a general solution. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (5), 491–514. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.603206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASB, 2006. Meeting Summary June 2006. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2009. Credit Risk in Liability Measurement (Discussion Paper). London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2010. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2011. IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R., and Verba, S., 1994. Designing Social Enquiry. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaFond, R. and Roychowdhury, S., 2008. Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 46 (1), 101–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFond, R. and Watts, R., 2008. The information role of conservatism. Accounting Review, 83 (2), 447–478. doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsman, W., 2007. Is fair value information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Accounting and Business Research, 37 (Supplement 1), 19–30. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2007.9730081
   Google Scholar
• Leisenring, J., Linsmeier, T., Schipper, K., and Trott, E., 2012. Business-model (intent)-based accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 42 (3), 329–344. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2012.681860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennard, A., 2002. Liabilities and How to Account for Them: An Exploratory Essay. London: ASB.
   Google Scholar
• Lipe, R.C., 2002. Fair valuing debt turns deteriorating credit quality into positive signals for Boston Chicken. Accounting Horizons, 16 (2), 169–181. doi: 10.2308/acch.2002.16.2.169
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F., 1953. On the statistical treatment of football numbers. American Psychologist, 8 (12), 750–751. doi: 10.1037/h0063675
   Google Scholar
• Ma, R. and Lambert, C., 1998. In praise of Occam's razor: a critique of the decomposition approach in IAS 32 to accounting for convertible debt. Accounting and Business Research, 28 (2), 145–153. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1998.9728905
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, I., 2006. Discussion of ‘What has the invisible hand achieved?’ Accounting and Business Research, Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum, 36 (Suppl. 1), 63.
   Google Scholar
• Macve, R., 2010. The case for deprival value. Abacus, 46 (1), 111–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2010.00310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKernan, J., 2007. Objectivity in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (1), 155–180. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, O., 1950. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D., 2010. What are the essential features of a liability? Accounting Horizons, 24 (4), 623–633. doi: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.4.623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T., 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, C., 2009. The logic of pension accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 39 (3), 231–249. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2009.9663363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C., 2003. Liabilities and their Measurement in UK and International Standards. London: ACCA.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C., 2011. On relief value (deprival value) vs fair value measurement for contract liabilities: a comment and a response. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (5), 515–524. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.623280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C., 2012. On the definitions of income and revenue in IFRS. Accounting in Europe, 9 (1), 85–94. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.664395
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, P., 2009. Changing the concepts to justify the standards. Accounting Perspectives, 8 (4), 263–275. doi: 10.1506/ap.8.4.1
   Google Scholar
• O'Hanlon, J., 2013. Did loan-loss provisioning by UK banks become less timely after implementation of IAS 39? Accounting and Business Research, 43 (3), 225–258. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.747260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, W., 1922. Accounting Theory, with Special Reference to the Corporate Enterprise. New York: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2004. Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and measurement. Human Relations, 57 (6), 765–782. doi: 10.1177/0018726704044955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2010. Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 197–210. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, H., 2006. The IASB's proposed amendments to IAS 37. Accounting in Europe, 3 (1), 27–34. doi: 10.1080/09638180600920103
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, P., 2003. Presenting discounted future cash receipts and payments in financial statements. Abacus, 39 (2), 233–249. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00128
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., 2006. Identifying conditional conservatism. European Accounting Review, 15 (4), 511–525. doi: 10.1080/09638180601102099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, R., 1993. Accounting for liabilities to perform services. Accounting Horizons, 7 (3), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, R., 1970. Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S., 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103 (2684), 677–680. doi: 10.1126/science.103.2684.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, R.K. and Storey, S., 1998. The Framework of Financial Accounting Concepts and Standards. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., 1974. The Allocation Problem in Financial Accounting Theory. Sarasota, FL: AAA.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A., 2007. Engaged Scholarship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmanen, P., 2007. Measurement in accounting and fair value. In: P. Walton, ed. The Routledge Companion to Fair Value and Financial Reporting. Abingdon: Routledge, 152–172.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R., 2003a. Conservatism in accounting part I: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17 (3), 207–221. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R., 2003b. Conservatism in accounting part II: evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17 (4), 287–301. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.287
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R., 2006. What has the invisible hand achieved? Accounting and Business Research, Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum, 36 (Suppl. 1), 51–61. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730046
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, G., 2010. Measurement in financial reporting. Abacus, 46 (1), 104–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2010.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T., 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, G., 1988. The treatment of time in economics. In: G. Winston and R. Teichgraeber, eds. The Boundaries of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–52.
   Google Scholar