The qualitative characteristics of financial information, and managers’ accounting decisions: evidence from IFRS policy changes

References

• AICPA, 1973. Objectives of Financial Statements. Report of the Study Group on the Objectives of Financial Statements. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A. and Ramanna, K., 2013. Towards an understanding of the role of standard setters in standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55 (1), 66–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, P., Dionysiou, D. and Tsalavoutas, I., 2012. Mandatory adoption of IFRS by EU listed firms and comparability: determinants and analysts’ forecasts. Working Paper, ESSEC and University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum, 36 (Supplement), 5–27. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730040
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R. and Brown, P., 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (2), 159–178. doi: 10.2307/2490232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Kothari, S.P. and Robin, A., 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (1), 1–51. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, L.S., Jiang, J., Petroni, K.R. and Wang, I.Y., 2010. Comprehensive income: who's afraid of performance reporting? Accounting Review, 85 (1), 97–126. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E. and Schipper, K., 2008. Financial reporting transparency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23 (2), 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H. and Landsman, W.R., 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1–3), 77–104. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E., Konchitchki, Y. and Landsman, W.R., 2013. Cost of capital and earnings transparency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55 (2–3), 206–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R.F., 2003. Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00048-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1), 3–37. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beest, F., Braam, G. and Boelens, S., 2009. Quality of financial reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics. Working Paper, Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, G.P. and Rodriguez, R.P., 2008. Earnings management and accounting values: a test of Gray (1988). Journal of International Accounting Research, 7 (2), 1–23. doi: 10.2308/jiar.2008.7.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., Preiato, J. and Tarca, A., 2014. Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: an audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41 (1–2), 1–52. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, D., Massoudi, D., Taplin, R. and Tarca, A., 2011. IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia. British Accounting Review, 43 (1), 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning, J.B., 1929. The Economics of Accountancy: A Critical Analysis of Accounting Theory. New York: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H.B. and Nikolaev, V.V., 2013. Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test? Review of Accounting Studies, 18 (3), 734–775. doi: 10.1007/s11142-013-9232-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., Ge, W. and Schrand, C., 2010. Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2–3), 344–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Franco, G., Kothari, S.P. and Verdi, R.S., 2011. The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49 (4), 895–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichev, I.D., Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R. and Rajgopal, S., 2013. Earnings quality: evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56 (2–3, Supplement), 1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Financial Reporting Advisory Group, 2013a. Getting a Better Framework: Reliability of Financial Information. Brussels: European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (and published by national standard-setters).
   Google Scholar
• European Financial Reporting Advisory Group, 2013b. Getting a Better Framework: Prudence. Brussels: European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (and published by national standard-setters).
   Google Scholar
• FASB, 2010. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, T.D., Lys, T.Z. and Vincent, L., 2001. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1–3), 255–307. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, P., 1992. The FASB Conceptual Framework Project 1973–1985: An Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S.J., 1988. Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24 (1), 1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1988.tb00200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, R.L. and Zmijewski, M.E., 1979. Some economic determinants of accounting policy choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1 (2), 141–161. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(79)90004-1
   Google Scholar
• Hail, L., 2013. Financial reporting and firm valuation: relevance lost or relevance regained? Accounting and Business Research, 43 (4), 329–358. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.799402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, A. and Wehrfritz, M., 2013. The impact of national GAAP and accounting traditions on IFRS policy selection: evidence from Germany and the UK. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 22 (1), 39–56. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2013.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P.M., 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1–3), 85–107. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., 1980. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R.W. and Leftwich, R.W., 1983. The economic consequences of accounting choice: implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 77–117. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, H.G., 1985. Potential determinants of corporate inventory accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 23 (2), 448–467. doi: 10.2307/2490820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunton, J.E., Libby, R. and Mazza, C.L., 2006. Financial reporting transparency and earnings management. Accounting Review, 81 (1), 135–157. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board, 2010. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board, 2013. A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board, 2014. IASB Update, May. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Committee, 1989. Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. London: International Accounting Standards Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, G.J. and Blanchet, J., 2000. Assessing quality of financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 14 (3), 353–363. doi: 10.2308/acch.2000.14.3.353
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. and Smith, M., 2014. Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (1), 183–208. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, E.J., Libby, R. and Sunder, S., 1982. Using the FASB's qualitative characteristics in accounting policy choices. Journal of Accounting Research, 20 (2), 654–675. doi: 10.2307/2490891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadous, K., Koonce, L. and Thayer, J.M., 2012. Do financial statement users judge relevance based on properties of reliability? Accounting Review, 87 (4), 1335–1356. doi: 10.2308/accr-50157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M., 2009. Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978.
   Google Scholar
• Koonce, L., Nelson, K.K. and Shakespeare, C.M., 2011. Judging the relevance of fair value for financial instruments. Accounting Review, 86 (6), 2075–2098. doi: 10.2308/accr-10134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaal, E. and Nobes, C.W., 2010. International differences in IFRS policy choice: a research note. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (2), 173–187. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaal, E. and Nobes, C.W., 2012. IFRS policy changes and the continuation of national patterns of IFRS practice. European Accounting Review, 21 (2), 343–371. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2011.611236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFond, R. and Watts, R.L., 2008. The information role of conservatism. Accounting Review, 83 (2), 447–478. doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6), 1113–1155. doi: 10.1086/250042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, F. and Schadéwitz, H., 2013. Are legal families related to financial reporting quality? Abacus, 49 (2), 242–267. doi: 10.1111/abac.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeal, K., 1939. Truth in Accounting. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macve, R.H., 2014. What should be the nature and role of a revised conceptual framework for international accounting standards? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 2 (2), 77–95. doi: 10.1080/21697221.2014.916886
   Google Scholar
• Macve, R.H., 2015. Fair value vs conservatism? Aspects of the history of accounting, auditing, business and finance from ancient Mesopotamia to modern China. British Accounting Review, 47 (2), 124–141. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maines, L.A. and Wahlen, J.M., 2006. The nature of accounting information reliability: inferences from archival and experimental research. Accounting Horizons, 20 (4), 399–425. doi: 10.2308/acch.2006.20.4.399
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney, B., 2002. Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55 (1), 89–118. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055001602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C.W., 1983. The evolution of the harmonising provisions of the 1980 and 1981 Companies Acts. Accounting and Business Research, 14 (53), 43–53. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1983.9729186
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C.W., 2009. The importance of being fair: an analysis of IFRS regulation and practice – a comment. Accounting and Business Research, 39 (4), 415–427. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2009.9663375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C.W. and Stadler, C., 2013. How arbitrary are international accounting classifications? Lessons from centuries of classifying in many disciplines, and experiments with IFRS data. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (8), 573–595. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, W.A., 1922. Accounting Theory: With Special Reference to the Corporate Enterprise. New York: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2010. Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum, 40 (3), 197–210. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, B.A., 2007. Financial Reporting in the UK: A History of the Accounting Standards Committee, 1969–1990. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schattke, R.W., 1972. An analysis of Accounting Principles Board statement no. 4. Accounting Review, 47 (2), 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. and Taffler, R., 1992. Readability and understandability: different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5 (4), 84–98. doi: 10.1108/09513579210019549
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, R.R., 1967. A statement of basic accounting theory: a review article. Journal of Accounting Research, 5 (1), 95–112. doi: 10.2307/2489988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A.P., 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17 (3), 281–308. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L., 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review, 53 (1), 112–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L., 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, G., 2008. Fair value and the IASB/FASB conceptual framework project: an alternative view. Abacus, 44 (2), 139–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambon, S., 1996. Accounting and business economics traditions: a missing European connection? European Accounting Review, 5 (3), 401–411. doi: 10.1080/09638189600000026
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S.A., 1999. The evolution of the conceptual framework for business enterprises in the United States. Accounting Historians Journal, 26 (2), 89–131.
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S.A., 2013. The objectives of financial reporting: a historical survey and analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 43 (4), 262–327. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.782237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar