Constructing institutional performance: a multi-level framing perspective on performance measurement and management

References

• Adolfsson, P. and Wikström, E., 2007. After quantification: quality dialogue and performance. Financial Accountability and Management, 23 (1), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari, S., Wijen, F. and Gray, B., 2013. Constructing a climate change logic: an institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organization Science, 24 (4), 1014–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M. and Jeppesen, K.K., 2016. Practice variation in public sector internal auditing: an institutional analysis. European Accounting Review, 25 (2), 319–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjaliès, D-L., 2010. A social movement perspective on finance: how socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (1), 57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M. and Azzone, G., 2010. Constructing performance measurement in the public sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21 (4), 266–282.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J. and Dorado, S., 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6), 1419–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, H.A. and Micheli, P., 2017. How performance measurement influences stakeholders in not-for-profit organizations. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37 (9), 1164–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhimani, A., Dai, N.T, Sivabalan, P. and Tang, G., 2018. How do enterprises respond to a managerial accounting performance measure mandated by the state? Journal of Management Accounting Research (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A. and Haack, P., 2015. The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40 (1), 49–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boitier, M. and Riviere, A. 2013. Freedom and responsibility for French universities: from global steering to local management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26 (4), 616–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., and Modell, S., 2000. An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11 (3), 281–306.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R., 2009. Performance management systems: a conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20 (4), 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, P. and Powell, W.W., 2012. From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J. and Nahapiet, J., 1980. The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5 (1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., Kraus, K. and Messner, M., 2016. Performance measurement systems and the enactment of different institutional logics: insights from a football organization. Management Accounting Research, 32, 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catasús, B. and Grönlund, A., 2005. More peace for less money: measurement and accountability in the Swedish Armed Forces. Financial Accountability and Management, 21 (4), 467–484.
   Google Scholar
• Catasús, B., Ersson, S., Gröjer, J-E. and Wallentin, F.Y., 2007. What gets measured gets … on indicating, mobilizing and acting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20 (4), 505–521.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L-C., 2006. Managerial responses to externally imposed performance measurement in the NHS: an institutional theory perspective. Financial Accountability and Management, 22 (1), 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R.H., Hall, M. and Smith, D., 2013. Performance measurement, modes of evaluation and the development of compromising accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (4), 268–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiwamit, P., Modell, S. and Yang, C., 2014. The societal relevance of management accounting innovations: Economic Value Added and institutional work in the fields of Chinese and Thai state-owned enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 44 (2), 144–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiwamit, P., Modell, S. and Scapens, R.W., 2017. Regulation and adaptation of management accounting innovations: the case of Economic Value Added in Thai state-owned enterprises. Management Accounting Research, 37, 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chreim, S., 2006. Managerial frames and institutional discourses of change: employee appropriation and resistance. Organization Studies, 27 (9), 1261–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, L.H. and Lounsbury, M., 2013. Strange brew: bridging logics via institutional bricolage and the reconstitution of organizational identity, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39B, 199–232.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C. and Langley, A., 2013. The logic of institutional logics: insights from French pragmatist sociology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22 (4), 360–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, L. and Uslu, P.G., 2012. UK health sector performance management: conflict, crisis and unintended consequences. Accounting Forum, 36 (4), 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J. and Ezzamel, M., 2013. Globalization discourses and performance measurement in a multinational firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (4), 288–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J.P. and Werner, M.D., 2014. Putting framing in perspective: a review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 181–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuganesan, S. and Lacey, D., 2011. Developments in public sector performance measurement: a project on producing return on investment metrics for law enforcement. Financial Accountability and Management, 27 (4), 458–479.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, N.T., Tan, Z.S., Tang, G. and Xiao, J.Z., 2017. IPOs, institutional complexity, and management accounting in hybrid organisations: a field study in a state-owned enterprise in China. Management Accounting Research, 36, 2–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, R.J. and Bitektine, A.B., 2009. The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? Exploring divergent agendas in institutional research. In: A. Buchanan and A. Bryman, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D.L. and Suchman, M., 2008. Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 49–77.
   Google Scholar
• Déjean, F., Gond, P. and Leca, B., 2004. Measuring the unmeasured: an institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57 (6), 741–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J.F., Rigsby, J.T. and Goodman, C., 2004. The making and remaking of organization context: duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17 (4), 506–542.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (1), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenius, M. and Hasselbladh, H., 2002. The balanced scorecard as an intellectual technology. Organization, 9 (2), 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, H., Gerdin, J. and Abrahamsson, G., 2013. Accounting ambiguity and structural change. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26 (3), 423–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W.N. and Sauder, M., 2007. Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H. and Worthington, F., 2008. Manufacturing shareholder value: the role of accounting in organizational transformation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (2), 107–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Robson, K. and Stapleton, P., 2012. The logics of budgeting: theorization and practice variation in the educational field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37 (4), 281–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. and Otley, D.T., 2009. The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20 (4), 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P.C. and Hirsch, P.M., 2005. The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70 (1), 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P.C. and Zajac, E.J., 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (6), 1173–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L. and Bourne, M., 2012. Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23 (2), 79–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnari, S., 2018. When does an issue trigger change in a field? A comparative approach to issue frames, field structures and types of field change. Human Relations, 71 (3), 321–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S.B. and Barden, J., 2006. Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: a framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31 (2), 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamporcaro, S. and Gond, J-P., 2016. Calculability as politics in the construction of markets: the case of socially responsible investment in France. Organization Studies, 37 (4), 465–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., Mack, S., Messner, M. and Weber, J., 2018. Exploring the persuasiveness of accounting numbers in the framing of ‘performance’ – a micro-level analysis of performance review meetings. European Accounting Review, 27 (3), 495–525.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., Purdy, J.M. and Ansari, S., 2015. From interaction to institutions: microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40 (1), 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R., 2006. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1), 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, A.R. and Lounsbury, M., 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Hinings, C.R. and Whetten, D., 2014. Rethinking institutions and organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 51 (7), 1206–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Millo, Y. and Barman, E., 2015. Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52 (7), 907–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebl, M.R.W., 2018. Management accounting as a political resource for enabling embedded agency. Management Accounting Research, 38, 22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, T. and Major, M., 2007. Extending institutional analysis through theoretical triangulation: regulation and activity-based costing in Portuguese telecommunications. European Accounting Review, 16 (1), 59–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A.G. and Miller, P., eds, 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C.D. and Larcker, D.F., 1998. Innovation in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205–238.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, S. and Lounsbury, M., 2017. The meaning of economic democracy: institutional logics, parabiosis, and the construction of frames. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 48A, 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., 2008. Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19 (5), 729–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R., Doyle, G. and O’Donohoe, S., 2015. Framing performance management of acute-care hospitals by interlacing NPM and institutional perspectives: a new theoretical framework. Financial Accountability and Management, 31 (1), 69–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondra, A.Z. and Hinings, C.R., 1998. Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19 (5), 743–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M. and Carter, C., 2010. Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23 (3), 325–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M.S. and Block, E., 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 243–275.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, K. and Strömsten, T., 2012. Going public: the role of accounting and shareholder value in making sense of an IPO. Management Accounting Research, 23 (3), 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, M.W., Koene, B.A.S. and Linssen, S.N., 2013. Committed to professionalism: organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (2), 130–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Länsiluoto, A., Järvenpää, M. and Krumwiede, K., 2013. Conflicting interests but filtered targets: stakeholder and resource-dependency analyses at a University of Applied Sciences. Management Accounting Research, 24 (4), 228–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Theule, M-A. and Lupu, I., 2016. Publishing without editors or authors? Competing logics, circulation, and cultural creation in a publishing firm. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 38, 14–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligonie, M., 2018. The “forced performativity” of a strategy concept: exploring how shared value shaped a gambling company’s strategy. Long Range Planning (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, S. and Northcott, D., 2005. The average hospital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30 (6), 555–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., Wright, M. and Wild, A., 2015. The institutionalization of third stream activities in UK higher education: the role of discourse and metrics. British Journal of Management, 26 (1), 78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok, J., 2018. Why (and how) institutional theory can be critical: addressing the challenge to institutional theory’s critical turn. Journal of Management Inquiry (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorino, P., Mourey, D. and Schmidt, G., 2017. Goffman’s theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 32–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., 2007. A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2), 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., 2008. Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (4–5), 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. and Ventresca, M., 2003. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10 (3), 457–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M. and Hirsch, P.M., 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1 (1), 71–104.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D, and Scott, W.R., 2005. Organizations and movements. In G.F. Davis, D. McAdam, W.R. Scott and M.N. Zald, eds. Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4–40.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R.E. and Höllerer, M.A, 2010. Meaning structures in a contested issue field: a topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6), 1241–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R.E. and Höllerer, M.A., 2014. Does institutional theory need redirecting? Journal of Management Studies, 51 (7), 1221–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 440–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.W. and Zucker, L.G., 1989. Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Micelotta, E., Lounsbury, M. and Greenwood, R., 2017. Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 43 (6), 1885–1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. and Power, M., 2013. Accounting, organizing and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 557–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2001. Performance measurement and institutional processes: a study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research, 12 (4), 437–464.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2003. Goals versus institutions: the development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14 (4), 333–359.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2004. Performance measurement myths in the public sector: a research note. Financial Accountability and Management, 20 (1), 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2005. Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18 (4), 537–563.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2009. Institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector accounting literature: a review and assessment. Financial Accountability and Management, 25 (3), 277–303.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2012. Strategy, political regulation and management control in the public sector: institutional and critical perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 23 (4), 278–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S., 2014. The societal relevance of management accounting: an introduction to the special issue. Accounting and Business Research, 44 (2), 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. 2015. Making institutional accounting research critical: dead end or new beginning? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28 (5), 773–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. and Wiesel, F., 2008. Marketization and performance measurement in Swedish central government: a comparative institutionalist study, Abacus, 44 (3), 251–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. and Yang, C., 2018. Financialisation as a strategic action field: an historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises, Critical Perspectives on Accounting (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S., Jacobs, K. and Wiesel, F., 2007. A process (re)turn? Path dependencies, institutions and performance management in Swedish central government. Management Accounting Research, 18 (4), 453–475.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R.J., 2013. Sustainability, institutionalization and the duality of structure: contradiction and unintended consequences in the political context of an Australian water business. Management Accounting Research, 24 (4), 366–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergren, K., 2006. The institutional construction of consumerism: a study of implementing quality indicators. Financial Accountability and Management, 22 (2), 179–205.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A-C. and Santos, F., 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (4), 972–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., D’Adderio, L., Williams, R. and Leforestier, L., 2018. Conforming or transforming? How organizations respond to multiple rankings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 64, 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzer, T., Meyer, R.E., Höllerer, M. and Seiwald, J., 2017. Institutional hybridity in public sector reform: replacement, blending, or layering of administrative problems. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 48B, 69–99.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W.W., 1988. Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance. In L.G. Zucker, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2015. How accounting begins: object formation and the accretion of infrastructure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J.M. and Gray, B., 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (2), 355–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J., Ansari, S. and Gray, B., 2018. Are logics enough? Framing as an alternative tool for understanding institutional meaning making. Journal of Management Inquiry (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, S. and Cooper, D.J., 2011. The role of inscriptions in producing a balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36 (6), 344–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, A., 2010. Contending legitimations: performance measurement coupling and decoupling in two Finnish cities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23 (3), 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, A. and Järvenpää, M., 2012. Institutional logics and responses to performance measurement systems. Financial Accountability and Management, 28 (2), 164–188.
   Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, A., Urquia-Grande, E. and Munoz-Colomina, C., 2017. Institutional logics in police performance indicator development: a comparative case study of Spain and Finland. European Accounting Review, 26 (2), 165–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T. and Hinings, C.R., 2005. The recomposition of organizational fields: health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26 (3), 351–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T. and Hinings, C.R., 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30 (6), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäffer, U., Strauss, E. and Zecher, C. 2015. The role of management control systems in situations of institutional complexity. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 12 (4), 395–424.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiberg, M., 2007. What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5 (1), 47–80.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32 (4), 493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. and Caronna, C., 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M-G. and Creed, W.E.D. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, U, Lawrence, S. and Lowe, A., 2010. Institutional contradiction and management control innovation: a field study of total quality management practices in a privatized telecommunication company. Management Accounting Research, 21 (4), 251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siti-Nabiha, A.K. and Scapens, R.W., 2005. Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18 (1), 44–73.
   Google Scholar
• Smets, M, Morris, T. and Greenwood, R., 2012. From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4), 877–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D., 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundin, H., Granlund, M. and Brown, D.A., 2010. Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. European Accounting Review, 19 (2), 203–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutheewasinnon, P., Hoque, Z. and Nyamori, R.O., 2016. Development of a performance management system in the Thailand public sector: isomorphism and the role and strategies of institutional entrepreneurs. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 40, 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H., van Helden, G.J. and van der Kolk, B., 2015. Challenging the NPM ideas about performance management: selectivity and differentiation in outcome-oriented performance budgeting. Financial Accountability and Management, 31 (3), 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., 2004. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., Jones, C. and Kury, K., 2005. Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23, 125–170.
   Google Scholar
• Townley, B., Cooper, D.J. and Oakes, L., 2003. Performance measures and the rationalization of organizations. Organization Studies, 24 (7), 1045–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hengel, H., Budding, T. and Groot, T., 2014. Loosely coupled results control in Dutch municipalities. Financial Accountability and Management, 30 (1), 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, P.A.M., Zietsma, C., Greenwood, R. and Langley, A., 2016. Strategic responses to institutional complexity. Strategic Organization, 14 (4), 277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, A.L. and Arrington, C.E., 2007. Accounting, new public management and American politics: theoretical insights into the National performance review. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18 (1), 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, M.D. and Cornelissen, J.P., 2014. Framing the change: switching and blending frames and their role in instigating institutional change. Organization Studies, 35 (10), 1449–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, F. and Modell, S., 2014. From new public management to new public governance? Hybridization and implications for public sector consumerism. Financial Accountability and Management, 30 (2), 175–205.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, M. and Hoffman, A.J., 2008. Organizational fields: past, present and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 130–147.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. and Modell, S., 2013. Power and performance: institutional embeddedness and performance management in a Chinese local government organization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26 (1), 101–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. and Modell, S., 2015. Shareholder orientation and the framing of management control practices: a field study in a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 45, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zald, M.N. and Lounsbury, M., 2010. The wizards of Oz: towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organization Studies, 31 (7), 963–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T., 2013. Institutional logics and institutional work: should they be agreed? Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39A, 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zilber, T., 2017. How institutional logics matter: a bottom-up approach. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 48A, 137–155.
   Google Scholar