Problematising the decision-usefulness of fair values: empirical evidence from UK financial analysts

References

• Alvesson, M., and Sandberg, J., 2011. Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 247–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., 2018. ‘The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it’: a practitioner view. Accounting and Business Research, 48 (5), 494–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre, P., Cazavan-Jeny, A., Dick, W., Richard, C., and Walton, P., 2009. Fair value and the banking crisis in 2008: shooting the messenger. Accounting in Europe, 6 (1-3), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Arjaliès, D.-L., Grant, P., Hardie, I., MacKenzie, D., and Svetlova, E., 2017. Chains of Finance: How Investment Management is Shaped. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., 2012. Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., 2015. The turn to problematization: political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., 2016. IFRS–10 years later. Accounting and Business Research, 46 (5), 545–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, M., and Abraham, S., 2020. On the “realities” of investor-manager interactivity: Baudrillard, hyperreality, and management Q&A sessions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37 (2), 1290–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., 2015. Conservatism, prudence and the IASB’s conceptual framework. Accounting and Business Research, 45 (4), 514–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., Hendry, J., Roberts, J., and Sanderson, P., 2012. Can company-fund manager meetings convey informational benefits? Exploring the rationalisation of equity investment decision making by UK fund managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37 (4), 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., and Penman, S., 2020. Moving the conceptual framework forward: accounting for uncertainty. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37 (1), 322–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., and Schulte, S., 2017. Representing the market perspective: fair value measurement for non-financial assets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R., and Teixeira, A., 2018. Gaps in the IFRS conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 15 (2), 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., 2015. On problematization: elaborations on a theme in ‘late Foucault’. Available from: https://nonsite.org/article/on-problematization.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E., 2006. Including estimates of the future in today’s financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 20 (3), 271–285.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E, 2007. Standard-setting measurement issues and the relevance of research. Accounting and Business Research, 37, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E., 2014. Measurement in financial reporting: the need for concepts. Accounting Horizons, 28 (2), 331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E., and Landsman, W.R., 2018. Using fair value earnings to assess firm value. Accounting Horizons, 32 (4), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudot, L., 2018. On commitment toward knowledge templates in global standard setting: the case of the FASB-IASB revenue project. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35 (2), 657–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, A., and Irvine, H., 2015. Derivatives disclosure in corporate annual reports: bank analysts’ perceptions of usefulness. Accounting and Business Research, 45 (5), 602–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H.R., and Ryan, G.W., 2010. Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bhimani, A., Bond, D., and Sivabalan, P., 2019. Does greater user representation lead to more user focused standards? An empirical investigation of IASB’s approach to standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38, 65–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryer, R.A., 1999. A Marxist critique of the FASB’s conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 10 (5), 551–589.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 1984. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32, 196–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., García Osma, B., Gassen, J., Imam, S., and Jeanjean, T., 2016. Professional Investors and the Decision-Usefulness of Financial Reporting. ICAS and EFRAG.
   Google Scholar
• Chahed, Y., 2020. Words and numbers: financialization and accounting standard setting in the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., 2010. Conceptual frameworks of accounting from an information perspective. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J., and Morgan, W., 2013. Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making. Accounting and Business Research, 43 (4), 418–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, N.T., Free, C., and Gendron, Y., 2019. Interview-based research in accounting 2000–2014: informal norms, translation and vibrancy. Management Accounting Research, 42, 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, R., 2000. Theory as practice: Foucault’s concept of problematization. Telos, 118, 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, G., and Clarke, F.L., 2003. An evolving conceptual framework? Abacus, 39 (3), 279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Demski, J.S., 1973. The general impossibility of a normative accounting standard. The Accounting Review, 48 (4), 718–723.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, I., 2018. What is a conceptual framework for financial reporting? Accounting in Europe, 15 (3), 374–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, I., 2019. The conceptual framework – A long and winding road … . Accounting in Europe, 16 (3), 256–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detzen, D., 2016. From compromise to concept? – A review of ‘other comprehensive income’. Accounting and Business Research, 46 (7), 760–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichev, I., 2017. On the conceptual foundations of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 47 (6), 617–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., 2009. The future of interpretive accounting research: the contribution of McCracken's (1988) approach. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 6 (3), 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., and Fortin, A., 2010. Standard-setting institutions’ user-oriented legitimacy management strategies: the Canadian case. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 7 (4), 476–504.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., and Gendron, Y., 2011. IFRS: on the docility of sophisticated users in preserving the ideal of comparability. European Accounting Review, 20 (2), 233–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin, A., Allini, A., and Zagaria, C., 2019. Users’ legitimacy perceptions about standard-setting processes. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (2), 206–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., and Gendron, Y., 2014. Epistemic commitment and cognitive disunity toward fair-value accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 44 (6), 630–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin, A., and Cote, L., 2007. Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: a theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (1–2), 29–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, C., and Pelger, C., 2015. “Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 13–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2012. Why mass media matter, and how to work with them: phronesis and megaprojects. In: B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, and S. Schram, eds. Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1985. The use of Pleasure: History of Sexuality: Volume Two. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gassen, J., and Schwedler, K., 2010. The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review, 19 (3), 495–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, G., Mora, A., and Wagenhofer, A., 2014. Revisiting the fundamental concepts of IFRS. Abacus, 50 (1), 107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, O., 2018. The worth of fair value accounting: dissonance between users and standard setters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35 (3), 1297–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, O., and Jack, L., 2011. In pursuit of legitimacy: a history behind fair value accounting. The British Accounting Review, 43 (4), 311–323.
   Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle, K., and Locke, K., 2007. Composing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Graaf, J., 2018. Equity market interactions: exploring analysts’ role performances at earnings presentations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31 (4), 1230–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, E.E., 2020. Auditors, specialists, and professional jurisdiction in audits of fair values. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37 (1), 245–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, N., Li, W., and O’Hanlon, J., 2019. Reflections on the development of the FASB’s and IASB’s expected-loss methods of accounting for credit losses. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (6), 682–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haswell, S., and Evans, E., 2018. Enron, fair value accounting, and financial crises: a concise history. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31 (1), 25–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayoun, S., 2019. How fair value is both market-based and entity-specific: the irreducibility of value constellations to market prices. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 73, 68–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, R.D., 1989. Financial accounting knowledge, conceptual frameworks and the social construction of the accounting profession. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2 (2), 72–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, R.D., 1991. The FASB’s conceptual framework, financial accounting and the maintenance of the social world. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16 (4), 313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitz, J.-M., 2007. The decision-usefulness of fair value accounting – A theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review, 16 (2), 323–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelström, A., Hjelström, T., and Sjögren, E., 2014. Decision Usefulness Explored: An Investigation of Capital Market Actors’ use of Financial Reports. SEAG (Swedish Enterprise Accounting Group).
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, L., Hopkins, P., and Schipper, K., 2013. Fair value measurement in financial reporting. Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 8 (3-4), 143–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 2011. The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Power and Participation. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., 2013. Poststructuralism and After. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huikku, J., Mouritsen, J., and Silvola, H., 2017. Relative reliability and the recognisable firm: calculating goodwill impairment value. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., Loft, A., and Woods, M., 2009. The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (6/7), 810–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASB, 2018. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting and Basis for Conclusions. London: International Accounting Standards Board. March.
   Google Scholar
• IASC, 1989. Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. London: International Accounting Standards Committee.
   Google Scholar
• ICAEW, 2015. The Effects of Mandatory IFRS Adoption in the EU: A Review of Empirical Research. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Imam, S., and Spence, C., 2016. Context, not predictions: a field study of financial analysts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 29 (2), 226–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, G.J., and Young, S.J., 1998. Bridging the gap: who can bring a user focus to business reporting. Accounting Horizons, 12 (2), 154–159.
   Google Scholar
• Landsman, W.R., 2007. Is fair value information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Accounting and Business Research, 37, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, special issue on the ‘future of critique’. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2008. What is the style of matters of concern? Two lectures in empirical philosophy. Spinoza Lectures at the University of Amsterdam, April and May 2005, published as an independent pamphlet, Van Gorcum Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Available from: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/97-SPINOZA-GB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laux, C., and Leuz, C., 2009. The crisis of fair-value accounting: making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (6-7), 826–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T.A., 2015. Accounting and the decision usefulness framework. In: S. Jones, ed. The Routledge Companion to Financial Accounting Theory. Oxon: Routledge, 110-128.
   Google Scholar
• Lennard, A., 2018. Fair value and the conceptual framework. In: G. Livne and G. Markarian, eds. The Routledge Companion to Fair Value in Accounting. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25-40.
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., 2018. Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research. Accounting and Business Research, 48 (5), 582–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., 2018. The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, 48 (5), 465–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorino, P., Mourey, D., and Schmidt, G., 2017. Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 32–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, A., Nama, Y., and Preda, A., 2020a. A research agenda for problematising profit and profitability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33 (4), 681–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, A., Nama, Y., Bryer, A., Chabrak, N., Dambrin, C., Jeacle, I., Lind, J., Lorino, P., Robson, K., Bottausci, C., Spence, C., Carter, C., and Svetlova, E., 2020b. Problematizing profit and profitability: discussions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33 (4), 753–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macve, R., 2010. Conceptual frameworks of accounting: some brief reflections on theory and practice. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 303–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macve, R., 2014. What should be the nature and role of a revised conceptual framework for International accounting standards? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 2 (2), 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., and Gendron, Y., 2009. Mythical representations of trust in auditors and the preservation of social order in the financial community. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 735–750.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., and Salterio, S.E., 2016. Doing good field research: assessing the quality of audit field research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35 (1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantzari, E., and Georgiou, O., 2019. Ideological hegemony and consent to IFRS: insights from practitioners in Greece. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 59, 70–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantzari, E., Sigalas, C., and Hines, T., 2017. Adoption of the International financial reporting standards by Greek non-listed companies: the role of coercive and hegemonic pressures. Accounting Forum, 41 (3), 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maystadt, P., 2013. Should IFRS Standards be More “European"? Mission to Reinforce the EU’s Contribution to the Development of International Accounting Standards, Report by Philippe Maystadt, October. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/system/files/2013-11-12-maystadt-report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, S., 2004. The use of usefulness: an examination of the user needs approach to the financial reporting conceptual framework. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 7 (2), 52–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mennicken, A., and Miller, P., 2012. Accounting, territorialization and power. Foucault Studies, 13, 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mennicken, A. and Power, M., 2015. Accounting and the plasticity of valuation. In A. B. Antal, M. Hutter, and D. Stark, eds. Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 208–228.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., 1991. Accounting innovation beyond the enterprise: problematizing investment decisions and programming economic growth in the U.K. in the 1960s. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16 (8), 733–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and Power, M., 2013. Accounting, organizing and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 7 (1), 557–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, A., McGeachin, A., Barth, M. E., Barker, R., Wagenhofer, A., and Joos, P., 2019. Fair value accounting: the eternal debate – AinE EAA Symposium, May 2018. Accounting in Europe, in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, A., and Walker, M., 2015. The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting. Accounting and Business Research, 45 (5), 620–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, J., 2016. Internal lobbying at the IASB. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35 (3), 224–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, T., O’Connell, V., and Óhogartaigh, C., 2013. Discourses surrounding the evolution of the IASB/FASB conceptual framework: what they reveal about the “living law” of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (1), 72–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P.C., 2009. Changing the concepts to justify the standards. Accounting Perspectives, 8 (4), 263–275.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, J., 2013. Did loan-loss provisioning by UK banks become less timely after implementation of IAS 39? Accounting and Business Research, 43 (3), 225–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelger, C., 2016. Practices of standard-setting - an analysis of the IASB's and FASB's process of identifying the objective of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelger, C., 2020. The return of stewardship, reliability and prudence – a commentary on the IASB’s new conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 17 (1), 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pelger, C., and Spieß, N., 2017. On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Accounting and Business Research, 47 (1), 64–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman, S.H., 2007. Financial reporting quality: is fair value a plus or a minus? Accounting and Business Research, 37, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Penno, M.C., 2008. Rules and accounting: vagueness in conceptual frameworks. Accounting Horizons, 22 (3), 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2010. Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M.K., and Gendron, Y., 2015. Commentary: qualitative research in auditing: A methodological roadmap. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34 (2), 147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci, R., and Skærbæk, P., 2020. The co-performation of financial economics in accounting standard-setting: a study of the translation of the expected credit loss model in IFRS 9. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 81, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, S., and Williams, P., 2009. Making imaginary worlds real: the case of expensing employee stock options. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (6-7), 770–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., and Wang, T., 2019. Faithful representation as an ‘objective mirage’: a Saussurean analysis of accounting and its participation in the financial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 65, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., 1994. Inflation accounting and action at a distance: the Sandilands episode. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19 (1), 45–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., 1999. Social analyses of accounting institutions: economic value, accounting representation and the conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 10, 615–629.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, K. and Young, J.J., 2009. Socio-political studies of financial reporting and standard-setting. In: C. S. Chapman, D. J. Cooper, and P. Miller, ed. Accounting, Organizations, and Institutions: Essays in Honour of Anthony Hopwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 341–366.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., and Alvesson, M., 2011. Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18 (1), 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smieliauskas, W., Bewley, K., Gronewold, U., and Menzefricke, U., 2018. Misleading forecasts in accounting estimates: a form of ethical blindness in accounting standards? Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 437–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Lacroix, J.-H., Durocher, D., and Gendron, Y., 2011. The erosion of jurisdiction: auditing in a market value accounting regime. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23 (1), 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Staubus, G.J., 1999. The Decision-Usefulness Theory of Accounting. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I., 2019. Putting problematization to the test of our present, special issue on ‘problematizing the problematic’. Theory, Culture & Society, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenka, R., and Jaworska, S., 2019. The use of made up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 78, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, D.B., Cordery, C.J., and van Zijl, T., 2015. The purpose of financial reporting: the case for coherence in the conceptual framework and standards. Abacus, 51 (1), 116–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R.G., 2003. Objectives of financial reporting. Abacus, 39 (3), 340–355.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, G., 2008. Fair value and the IASB/FASB conceptual framework project: an alternative view. Abacus, 44 (2), 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, G., 2015. Measurement in financial reporting: half a century of research and practice. Abacus, 51 (4), 549–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P.F., 1987. The legitimate concern with fairness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (2), 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P.F., and Ravenscroft, S.P., 2015. Rethinking decision-usefulness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32 (2), 763–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J.J., 1996. Institutional thinking: the case of financial instruments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21 (5), 487–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J.J., 2003. Constructing, persuading and silencing: the rhetoric of accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (6), 621–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J.J., 2006. Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31 (6), 579–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S.A., 2013. The objectives of financial reporting: a historical survey and analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 43 (4), 262–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and Andrew, J., 2014. Financialisation and the conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25 (1), 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar