The effect of boilerplate language on nonprofessional investors’ judgments

References

• ASB, 1993. Operating and Financial Review. London: The Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., and Datta, A., 2014. Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types from textual risk disclosures. Management Science, 60 (6), 1371–1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, I., Armour, V., and Kerr, T., 1985. On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 17 (3), 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booking Holdings, 2020. Booking Holdings Inc.: Form 10-K. https://sec.report/Document/0001075531-20-000011/.
   Google Scholar
• Bozzolan, S., Trombetta, M., and Beretta, S., 2009. Forward-looking disclosures, financial verifiability and analysts’ forecasts: a study of cross-listed European firms. European Accounting Review, 18 (3), 435–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchheit, S., Doxey, M., Pollard, T., and Stinson, S.R., 2018. A technical guide to using Amazon’s mechanical Turk in behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 30 (1), 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.L., Chen, H., Dhaliwal, D., Lu, H., and Steele, L.B., 2014. The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings. Review of Accounting Studies, 19 (1), 396–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A.R., 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte, 2013. SEC Comment Letters Including Industry Insights: Constructing Clear Disclosures. London: Deloitte Development LLC. http://deloitte.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/files/2013/12/SEC-Comment-Letters-2014-Including-Industry-Insights-2014-Constructing-Clear-Disclosures.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dia, M., and Zéghal, D., 2008. Fuzzy evaluation of risk management profiles disclosed in corporate annual reports. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 25 (3), 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobler, M., 2008. Incentives for risk reporting — a discretionary disclosure and cheap talk approach. The International Journal of Accounting, 43 (2), 184–206.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., and Buehl, M., 1999. The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: the case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 145–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Haj, M., Alves, P., Rayson, P., Walker, M., and Young, S., 2020. Retrieving, classifying and analysing narrative commentary in unstructured (glossy) annual reports published as PDF files. Accounting and Business Research, 50 (1), 6–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, W.B., Hobson, J., and Jackson, K., 2011. Disaggregating management earnings forecasts to reduce investors’ susceptibility to earnings fixation. The Accounting Review, 86 (1), 185–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, W.B., Rennekamp, K.M., and White, B.J., 2015. Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest? Review of Accounting Studies, 20 (2), 839–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, A.M., Grenier, J.H., and Leiby, J., 2017. Scoundrels or stars? Theory and evidence on the quality of workers in online labor markets. The Accounting Review, 92 (1), 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischoff, B., Bostrom, A., and Quadre, M.J., 1993. Risk perception and communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 14 (1), 183–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRC, 2011a. Cutting Clutter: Combating Clutter in Annual Reports. London: Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/8250571d-4c6d-4d0a-9aa6-ef6a19c1fab2/Cutting-clutter-report-April-20112.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2011b. Financial Reporting Lab. London: Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/investors/financial-reporting-lab.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2017. Risk and Viability Reporting: Lab Project Report. London: Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/76e21dee-2be2-415f-b326-932e8a3fc1e6/Risk-and-Viability-Reporting.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2018. Guidance on the Strategic Report. London: Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/fb05dd7b-c76c-424e-9daf-4293c9fa2d6a/Guidance-on-the-Strategic-Report-31-7-18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2019. Annual Review of Corporate Reporting 2018/2019. London: Financial Reporting Council. https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/b3b6cd43-7ade-4790-959e-3b84d59a7253/Developments-in-Corporate-Reporting-2019-FINAL-Full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, K.P., and Eagly, A.H., 1993. Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (1), 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., and Poole, P.P., 1984. Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9 (3), 449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google, 2009. Google Inc.: Form 10-K. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312510030774/d10k.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, J., Kuang, X., and Venkataraman, S., 2011. Who believes the hype? An experimental examination of how language affects investor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 49 (1), 223–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, D.E., Koonce, L., and Venkataraman, S., 2007. How disaggregation enhances the credibility of management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 45 (4), 811–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, B.R., Krishnamoorthy, G., and Maroney, J.J., 2017. Pro forma earnings presentation effects and investment decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29 (2), 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R.M., and Einhorn, H.J., 1992. Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24 (1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.K., Hu, D., and Lu, H., 2016. The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 21 (4), 1005–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, R., 1987. Unsystematic security price movements, management earnings forecasts, and revisions in consensus analyst earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 25 (1), 90–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., 2010. SEC pushes companies for more risk disclosure. CFO, 2 August. http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14513695.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E.J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., and Kunreuther, H., 1993. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7 (1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasznik, R., and Lev, B., 1995. To warn or not to warn: management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. The Accounting Review, 70 (1), 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, J., 2013. What investors want and where they’re investing. Forbes, 2 August.
   Google Scholar
• Kisielius, J., and Sternthal, B., 1984. Detecting and explaining vividness effects in attitudinal judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (1), 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisielius, J., and Sternthal, B., 1986. Examining the vividness controversy: an availability-valence interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (4), 418–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonce, L., and Mercer, M., 2005. Using psychology theories in archival financial accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 24 (1), 175–214.
   Google Scholar
• Koonce, L., Lipe, M., and McAnally, M.L., 2005a. Judging the risk of financial instruments: problems and potential remedies. The Accounting Review, 80 (3), 871–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonce, L., McAnally, M.L., and Mercer, M., 2005b. How do investors judge the risk of financial items? The Accounting Review, 80 (1), 221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravet, T., and Muslu, V., 2013. Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18 (4), 1088–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krische, S.D., Sanders, P.R., and Smith, S.D., 2014. Management credibility and investment risk: an experimental investigation of lease accounting alternatives. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26 (1), 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., and Li, W., 2005. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lev, B., 2018. The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, 48 (5), 465–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R., and Tan, H.T., 1999. Analysts’ reactions to warnings of negative earnings surprises. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (2), 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R., Bloomfield, R., and Nelson, M., 2002. Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27 (8), 775–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsley, P.M., and Shrives, P.J., 2005. Examining risk reporting in UK public companies. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6 (4), 292–305.
   Google Scholar
• Linsley, P.M., and Shrives, P.J., 2006. Risk reporting: a study of risk disclosures in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38 (4), 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, M., 2005. The fleeting effects of disclosure forthcomingness on management’s reporting credibility. The Accounting Review, 80 (2), 723–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkl-Davies, D.M., and Brennan, N.M., 2011. A conceptual framework of impression management: new insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (5), 415–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B.P., 2010. The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review, 85 (6), 2107–2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K.K., and Pritchard, A.C., 2016. Carrot or stick? The shift from voluntary to mandatory disclosure of risk factors. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13 (2), 266–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R.E., and Ross, L., 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., and Acquisti, A., 2017. Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T., 1986. Communication and Persuasion. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pfarrer, M.D., Pollock, T.G., and Rindova, V.P., 2010. A tale of two assets: the effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (5), 1131–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K., and Hayes, A., 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennekamp, K., 2012. Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50 (5), 1319–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, T.J., Semin, G.R., and Yen, A.C., 2014. Patterns of language use in accounting narratives and their impact on investment-related judgments and decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26 (1), 59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, J., and Troob, P., 2001. Monkey Business: Swinging Through the Wall Street Jungle. New York, NY: Donaldson, Lufki and Jenrette.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B.R., Britt, T.W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., and Doherty, K., 1994. The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101 (4), 632–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebeok, T.A., 2001. Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2005. Regulation S-K, Item 503: Summary Information and Risk Factors, Release No 33-8591. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8591.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2009a. Fast Answers: Form 10-K. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answers-form10khtm.html.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2009b. Staff Observations. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/cfsmallcompanyregistration.htm.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2013a. Letter to Eaton Vance Corp. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/350797/000000000013017837/filename1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2013b. What We Do. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2019a. FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K: Final Rule. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2019/33-10618.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2019b. Proposed Rule: Modernization of Regulation S-K Items 101, 103, and 105. Washington, DC: Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2019/33-10668.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sedor, L.M., 2002. An explanation for unintentional optimism in analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 77 (4), 731–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S., 1968. Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78 (3), 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L, Paters, E., and MacGregor, D., 2004. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24 (2), 311–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S.M., and Schaffer, D.R., 2000. Vividness can undermine or enhance message processing: the moderating role of vividness congruency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (7), 769–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S., 1994. Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64 (1), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J.W., 2007. Is openness penalized? Stock returns around earnings warnings. The Accounting Review, 82 (4), 1055–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1973. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government, 2006. The Companies Act 2006. London: HMSO. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government, 2013. The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Director’s Report) Regulations 2013. London: HMSO. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2013/9780111540169/contents.
   Google Scholar
• Von Uexküll, J., 1982. The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42 (1), 25–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahoo, 2009. Yahoo! Inc.: 2009 Form 10-K. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1011006/000119312510043149/d10k.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J.H., and Liu, S., 2017. Accounting narratives and impression management on social media. Accounting and Business Research, 47 (6), 673–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar