The financial reporting system – what is it?

References

• Abbott, A., 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A., 2005. Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions. Sociological Theory, 23 (3), 245–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annisette, M., 2000. Imperialism and the professions: the education and certification of accountants in Trinidad and Tobago. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25 (7), 631–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, P.J., 2012. The political economy of financial harmonization: the East Asian financial crisis and the rise of international accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37 (6), 361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R.D., and Wade, J.P., 2015. A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., Cave, M., and Lodge, M., 2012. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., 2001. Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and Disclosure. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 127–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., 2008. What is the actual economic role of financial reporting? Accounting Horizons, 22 (4), 427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., and Brown, P., 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Robin, A., and Wu, J.S., 2003. Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 (1-3), 235–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E., 2000. Valuation-based accounting research: implications for financial reporting and opportunities for future research. Accounting & Finance, 40 (1), 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bausch, K.C., 1997. The Habermas/Luhmann debate and subsequent Habermasian perspectives on systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14 (5), 315–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEIS, 2021. Restoring Trust in Audit and Corporate Governance. Consultation on the Government’s Proposals. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z., and Walther, B.R., 2010. The financial reporting environment: review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2-3), 296–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bircher, P., 1988. The adoption of consolidated accounting in Great Britain. Accounting and Business Research, 19 (73), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Botzem, S., 2012. The Politics of Accounting Regulation: Organizing Transnational Standard Setting in Financial Reporting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bromwich, M., and Hopwood, A.G. eds., 1992. Accounting and the Law. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon Review, 2019. Report of the Independent Review into the Quality and Effectiveness of Audit. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/852960/brydon-review-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bushman, R.M., and Smith, A.J., 2001. Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (1-3), 237–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Audit Quality, 2021. A changing financial reporting ecosystem, Sunday, March 8, 2020. Available from: https://www.thecaq.org/cii/ [Accessed 15 March 21].
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., 1999. Systems thinking. In: W. Currie and B. Galliers, eds. Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, J.C., 2001. Understanding Enron: it's about the gatekeepers, stupid. The Business Lawyer, 57, 1403–1420.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, J.C., 2006. Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P., 1972. A garbage can model of organisational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J., and Sherer, M.J., 1984. The value of corporate accounting reports: arguments for a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9 (3-4), 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, M.M., 2014. Political connections and SEC enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57 (2-3), 241–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H., and Zhivitskaya, M., 2018. Three lines of defence: a robust organising framework, or just lines in the sand? Global Policy, 9, 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutia, T., 1995. The restructuring of the system of accounting in Romania during the period of transition to the market economy. European Accounting Review, 4 (4), 739–748.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R.G., Herz, R.H., Keegan, E.M., and Phillips, D.M., 2002. The Valuereporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D., 2007. Luhmann and emergentism: competing paradigms for social systems theory? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37 (4), 408–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint, D., 1971. The role of the auditor in modern society: an exploratory essay. Accounting and Business Research, 1 (4), 287–293.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Confessions of the flesh. In: C. Gordon, ed. Michel Foucault – Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 194–228.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2020. A Matter of Principles: The Future of Corporate Reporting. London: Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J., and Power, M., 1991. Law and accounting: transition and transformation. The Modern Law Review, 54 (6), 769–791.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, W., and McVay, S., 2005. The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons, 19 (3), 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., and Bebbington, J., 2001. Accounting for the Environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gjesdal, F., 1981. Accounting for stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research, 19 (1), 208–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I., 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, A.G., and May, R.M., 2011. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469 (7330), 351–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Maguire, S., Power, M., and Tsoukas, H., 2020. Organizing risk: organisation and management theory for the risk society. Academy of Management Annals, 14 (2), 1032–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautsch, N., Schaumburg, J., and Schienle, M., 2015. Financial network systemic risk contributions. Review of Finance, 19 (2), 685–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P.M., and Wahlen, J.M., 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13 (4), 365–383.
   Google Scholar
• Hessling, A., and Pahl, H., 2006. The global system of finance: scanning Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann for theoretical keystones. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65 (1), 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, R.D., 1988. Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13 (3), 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S., 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4 (5), 390–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R.W., and Watts, R.L., 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1-3), 3–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H., Baldwin, R., Rees, J., and Spackman, M., 1999. Where risk society meets the regulatory state: exploring variations in risk regulation regimes. Risk Management, 1 (1), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H., and Baldwin, R., 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons, 2018. Carillion. London: Business Energy and Industrial Strategy and Work and Pensions Committee, UK House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., and Loft, A., 2009a. Governing audit globally: IFAC, the new international financial architecture and the auditing profession. In: C. Chapman, D. Cooper and P. Miller, eds. Accounting, Organisations, & Institutions: Essays in Honour of Anthony Hopwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205–232.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., Loft, A., and Woods, M., 2009b. The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (6-7), 810–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAEW, 2017. Technical Release TECH 02/17BL. Guidance on Realised and Distributable Profits Under the Companies Act 2006. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• ICAEW, 2019. Financial Reporting: Who Does What? London: Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Kingman Review, 2018. Independent Review of the Financial Reporting Council. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/767387/frc-independent-review-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W.R., Thomas, E., and Driskill, M., 2020. Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 81, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraakman, R.H., 1986. Gatekeepers: the anatomy of a third-party enforcement strategy. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2 (1), 53–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, R., 2001. Contracting theory and accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (1-3), 3–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E.J., 1975. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (2), 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, C., and Tinker, T., 1987. The ‘real’ cultural significance of accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (5), 503–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., 2010. Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: how jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 229–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., and Wüstemann, J., 2004. The role of accounting in the German financial system. In: J. Krahnen and R. Schmidt, eds. The German Financial System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 450–481.
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., Deller, D., and Stubenrath, M., 1998. An international comparison of accounting-based payout restrictions in the United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Accounting and Business Research, 28 (2), 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., Nanda, D., and Wysocki, P.D., 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (3), 505–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., and Ohlson, J.A., 1982. Market-based empirical research in accounting: a review, interpretation, and extension. Journal of Accounting Research, 20 (supplement), 249–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., and Zarowin, P., 1999. The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (2), 353–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macve, R., 2020. Perspectives from mainland China, Hong Kong and the UK on the development of China’s auditing firms: implications and a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 50 (7), 641–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennicken, A., 2010. From inspection to auditing: audit and markets as linked ecologies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (3), 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and O'Leary, E.T., 2000. ValueReporting and the Information Ecosystem. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M.S., 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 1951. The Social System. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J., and Nölke, A., 2006. The political economy of international accounting standards. Review of International Political Economy, 13 (4), 559–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1997. The Audit Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2004. Academics in the accounting policy process: England and Germany compared. In: C. Leuz, D. Pfaff and A. Hopwood, eds. The Economics and Politics of Accounting: International Perspectives on Research Trends, Policy and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 376–392.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2009a. Financial accounting without a state. In: C. Chapman, D. Cooper and P. Miller, eds. Accounting, Organisations, & Institutions: Essays in Honour of Anthony Hopwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 324–340.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2009b. Memorandum. Submission of written evidence to the House of Commons Treasury Committee. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmtreasy/144/144w156.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2010. Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2021. Modelling the micro-foundations of the audit society: organisations and the logic of the audit trail. Academy of Management Review, 46 (1), 6–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 1988. Social network analysis. Sociology, 22 (1), 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P.M., and Sterman, J.D., 1992. Systems thinking and organisational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organisation of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59 (1), 137–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spira, L.F., and Slinn, J., 2013. The Cadbury Committee: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S.L., 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (3), 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocken, P.C., and Verrecchia, R.E., 2004. Financial reporting system choice and disclosure management. The Accounting Review, 79 (4), 1181–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunder, S., and Cyert, R.M., 1997. Theory of Accounting and Control. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, A.M., 1985. Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accountancy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, T., 1991. The accountant as partisan. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16 (3), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, T., and Neimark, M., 1987. The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917–1976. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (1), 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R.L., and Zimmerman, J.L., 1979. The demand for and supply of accounting theories: the market for excuses. The Accounting Review, 54 (2), 273–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar