Capital market response to high quality annual reporting: evidence from UK annual report awards

References

• Abraham, S., and Cox, P., 2007. Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39, 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Anis, R., Fraser, I., and Hussainey, K., 2012. A new measure for disclosure quality. Working Paper, Stirling University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• ASB, 2006. Reporting Statement: Operating and Financial Review. Available from: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/4aeb44dd-0c04-479d-9592-d1a503834216/Reporting-Statement-The-Operating-and-Financial-Review-January-2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Atiase, R.K., and Bamber, L.S., 1994. Trading volume reactions to annual accounting earnings announcements: the incremental role of predisclosure information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 309–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P.C., 2008. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2037–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P.C., 2011. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10, 150–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baginski, S.P., Hassell, J.M., and Kimbrough, M.D., 2004. Why do managers explain their earnings forecasts? Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, W., Andrewkarolyi, G., and Salva, C., 2006. The economic consequences of increased disclosure: evidence from international cross-listings. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 175–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, W., Li, H., Mao, C.X., and Zhong, R., 2003. Regulation fair disclosure and earnings information: market. Analyst, and Corporate Responses. Journal of Finance, 58, 2487–2514.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., and Clelland, I., 2004. Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., and Jones, M.J., 1997. A comparitive study of the use of financial graphs in the corporate annual reports of major U.S. and U.K. companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 8, 33–68.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., McInnes, B., and Fearnley, S., 2004. A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28, 205–236.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., McInnes, B., and Pierpoint, J., 2008. The management commentary: comparing narrative outcomes from alternative regulatory regimes. ICAEW Centre for Business Performance.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, W., 1968. The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekes, W., and Brown, P., 2006. Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures? Journal of Business Finance, 33, 422–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekes, W., Brown, P., and Zhang, Q., 2015. Corporate governance and the informativeness of disclosures in Australia: a re-examination. Accounting & Finance, 55, 931–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z., and Walther, B.R., 2010. The financial reporting environment: review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 296–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botosan, C., 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72, 323–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botosan, C.A., and Plumlee, M.A., 2002. A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., and Hillegeist, S.A., 2007. How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry. Review of Accounting Studies, 12, 443–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., and Tucker, J.W., 2011. Large-sample evidence on firms’ year-over-year MD&A modifications. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 309–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushee, B.J., and Noe, C.F., 2000. Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byard, D., and Shaw, K.W., 2003. Corporate disclosure quality and properties of analysts' information environment. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 18, 355–378.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., and Kopeinig, S., 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M., and Jones, M.J., 2001. The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14, 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M., and Jones, M.J., 2003. Financial reporting of good news and bad news: evidence from accounting narratives. Accounting and Business Research, 33, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M., and Jones, M.J., 2008. Overseas equity analysis by UK analysts and fund managers. The British Accounting Review, 40, 337–355.
   Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M.A., and Peel, M.J., 2021. Reporting accountant appointments and accounting restatements: evidence from UK private companies. The British Accounting Review, 53, 100974–100919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffee, J.C., 2002. Racing towards the top? The impact of cross-listings and stock market competition on international corporate governance. Columbia Law Review, 102, 1757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.A., 2008. Does information risk really matter? An analysis of the determinants and economic consequences of financial reporting quality. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 15, 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, W., Davie, E.S., and Weetman, P., 1993. Management discussion and analysis: an evaluation of practice in UK and US companies. Accounting and Business Research, 23, 123–137.
   Google Scholar
• Communicate Magazine, 2015. Corporate Financial Awards 2016: Entry Criteria.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S.M., and Owen, D.L., 2007. Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core, J.E., 2001. A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cready, W.M., and Mynatt, P.G., 1991. The information content of annual reports: a price and trading response analysis. Accounting Review, 66, 291–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C., and Carroll, G., 1993. An analysis of incentives for Australian firms to apply for reporting excellence awards. Accounting and Business Research, 23, 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• De Franco, G., Kothari, S.P., and Verdi, R.S., 2011. The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 895–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte, 2013. Need to know: new UK reporting regulations laid before parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, D.W., and Verrecchia, R.E., 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 46, 1325–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T.A., and Gangl, M., 2005. Assessing bias in the Estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables Estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 35, 271–310.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, M.S., Roulstone, D.R., and Thornock, J.R., 2016. The usefulness of historical accounting reports. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, 448–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K.A., and Mayhew, B.W., 2004. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, R.A., and Sridhar, S.S., 1995. Industry-wide disclosure dynamics. Journal of Accounting Research, 33, 157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• e.com, 2014. Annual report on annual reports 2014: Report Watch.
   Google Scholar
• El-Haj, M., Alves, P., Rayson, P., Walker, M., and Young, S., 2020. Retrieving, classifying and analysing narrative commentary in unstructured (glossy) annual reports published as PDF files. Accounting and Business Research, 50, 6–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng, L.L., and Mak, Y.T., 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325–345.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L.G., and Schneider, M., 2008. Ambiguity, information quality, and asset pricing. The Journal of Finance, 63, 197–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, M., 1981. The relative information content of the release of financial results data by firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRC, 2018. Guidance on the Strategic Report. Available from: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/fb05dd7b-c76c-424e-9daf-4293c9fa2d6a/Guidance-on-the-Strategic-Report-31-7-18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gallant, A.R., Rossi, P.E., and Tauchen, G., 1992. Stock prices and volume. Review of Financial Studies, 5, 199–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelb, D.S., and Zarowin, P., 2002. Corporate disclosure policy and the informativeness of stock prices. Review of Accounting Studies, 7, 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S., Kouhy, R., and Lavers, S., 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 47–77.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P.A., 2003. Got information? Investor response to form 10-K and form 10-Q EDGAR filings. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 433–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilliches, Z., 1995. R&D and productivity: econometric results and measurement issues. In: P. Stoneman, ed. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 52–89.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., and Parker, L., 1990. Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Hail, L., 2002. The impact of voluntary corporate disclosures on the ex-ante cost of capital for Swiss firms. European Accounting Review, 11, 741–773.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B.B., 2008. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on ‘A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003’ by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2050–2054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., and Raviv, A., 1993. Differences of opinion make a horse race. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 473–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P.M., Hutton, A.P., and Palepu, K.G., 1999. Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16, 485–520.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P.M., and Palepu, K.G., 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 405–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B.E., and Weisbach, M.S., 1998. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88, 96–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, R.D., 1982. The usefulness of annual reports: the anomaly between the efficient markets hypothesis and shareholder surveys. Accounting and Business Research, 12, 296–309.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, L., and Boon Foo, Y., 2003. Differences in environmental reporting practices in the UK and the US: the legal and regulatory context. The British Accounting Review, 35, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R.W., and Verrecchia, R.E., 1990. The effect of informedness and consensus on price and volume behavior. The Accounting Review, 65, 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., Perera, M.H.B., and Rahman, A.R., 1995. Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 6, 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hussainey, K., and Mouselli, S., 2010. Disclosure quality and stock returns in the UK. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 11, 154–174.
   Google Scholar
• Hussainey, K., Schleicher, T., and Walker, M., 2003. Undertaking large-scale disclosure studies when AIMR-FAF ratings are not available: the case of prices leading earnings. Accounting and Business Research, 33, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• IAASB, 2015. ISA 720: The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Other Information and Related Conforming Amendments. Available from: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/ISA-720-(Revised).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICSA, 2014. ICSA: The Chartered Governance Institute Awards 2014.
   Google Scholar
• IR Society, 2015. IR Society 2015 Best Practice Awards Review. Available from: https://irsociety.org.uk/files/IRSoc_Best_Practice_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IR Society, 2022. IR Society Frequently Asked Questions. Available from: https://irsocietyawards.org.uk/faqs.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.J., 1988. A longitudinal study of the readability of the chairman’s narratives in the corporate reports of a UK company. Accounting and Business Research, 18, 297–305.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E., and Pearson, N.D., 1995. Differential interpretation of public signals and trade in speculative markets. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 831–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpoff, J.M., 1986. A theory of trading volume. The Journal of Finance, 41, 1069–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpoff, J.M., 1987. The relation between price changes and trading volume: a survey. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, O., and Verrecchia, R.E., 1991. Trading volume and price reactions to public announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., and Nielsen, R., 2019. Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis, 27, 435–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, M.H., Lins, K.V., and Miller, D.P., 2003. Adrs, analysts, and accuracy: does cross listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 317–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, M.H., and Lundholm, R., 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 246–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, M.H., and Lundholm, R.J., 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71, 467–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D.F., and Rusticus, T.O., 2010. On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C.S., Francis, J.R., and Wang, Z., 2012. Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87, 589–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, A., and Tan, Q., 2019. Rethinking Determinants of Trading Volume at Earnings Announcements. University of Connecticut School of Business Research Paper, (19-05).
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., and Wysocki, P.D., 2008. Economic Consequences of Financial Reporting and Disclosure Regulation: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available from SSRN 1105398.
   Google Scholar
• Li, E.X., and Ramesh, K., 2009. Market reaction surrounding the filing of periodic SEC reports. The Accounting Review, 84, 1171–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., 2010. The information content of forward-looking statements in corporate filings-a naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 48, 1049–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsley, P.M., and Lawrence, M.J., 2007. Risk reporting by the largest UK companies: readability and lack of obfuscation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20, 620–627.
   Google Scholar
• Linsley, P.M., and Shrives, P.J., 2006. Risk reporting: a study of risk disclosures in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38, 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., and McDonald, B., 2011. When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66, 35–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkl-Davies, D., and Brennan, N., 2007. Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116–194.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M., 2017. Can’t Live With It, Can’s Live Without It: The Continuing Role of the Annual Report. London: IIRC.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, M.J., and Makepeace, G.H., 2009. Propensity Score Matching in Accounting Research and Rosenbaum Bounds Analysis for Confounding Variables. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1485734.
   Google Scholar
• PwC, 2007. Preparer’s Guide. Narrative Reporting. Give Yourself a Head Start. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/audit-services/corporate-reporting/assets/pdfs/narrative-reporting.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PwC, 2010. Investor View: Insight from the Investment Community. The Role of the Annual Report. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/audit-services/corporate-reporting/publications/investor-view/pdf/pwc-role-of-the-annual-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PwC, 2014. Navigating the Trust Journey – Excellence in Reporting Awards. Available from: https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/building-public-trust-excellence-in-reporting-awards-2014-2-october.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PwC, 2022. Award Categories and Criteria 2022. Available from: https://www.pwc.co.uk/who-we-are/building-public-trust-in-corporate-reporting-awards/award-categories-and-criteria.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rippington, F.A., and Taffler, R.J., 1995. The information content of firm financial disclosures. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22, 345–362.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., 1995. Obervational Studies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbottom, N., and Lymer, A., 2010. Exploring the use and users of narrative reporting in the online annual report. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 11, 90–108.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., Dunstan, K., and Brown, J., 2002. The value of public sector annual reports and annual reporting awards in organisational legitimacy. Accounting, Accountability & Performance, 8, 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, T., Hussainey, K., and Walker, M., 2007. Loss firms’ annual report narratives and share price anticipation of earnings. The British Accounting Review, 39, 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Schwert, G.W., 1989. Indexes of United States Stock Prices from 1802 to 1987 (No. w2985). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, J.E., Swanquist, Q.T., and Whited, R.L., 2017. Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 92, 213–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtatland, E., Moore, S., and Barton, M., 2011. Why We Need an R2 Measure of Fit (and Not Only One) in Proc Logistic and Proc Genmod. Statistics and Data Analysis, (256–25).
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, E.A., 2010. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutley, K.R., 1994. An empirical investigation into the relation between differential annual report informativeness and the association of stock returns with accounting earnings: the case of the Financial post annual report awards. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Verrecchia, R.E., and Weber, J., 2006. Redacted disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 44, 791–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B., Davidson, W.N., and DaDalt, P.J., 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yekini, L.S., Wisniewski, T.P., and Millo, Y., 2016. Market reaction to the positiveness of annual report narratives. The British Accounting Review, 48, 415–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuthas, K., Rogers, R., and Dillard, J.F., 2002. Communicative action and corporate annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenhofer, A., 2004. Accounting and economics: what we learn from analytical models in financial accounting and reporting. In: C. Leuz, D. Pfaff, and A. Hopwood, eds. The Economics and Politics of Accounting: International Perspectives on Research Trends, Policy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Shrives, P., and Marston, C., 2002. Voluntary disclosure of accounting ratios in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 34, 289–313.
   Google Scholar