Groupthink tendencies in top management teams and financial reporting fraud

References

• Abbott, L.J., Parker, S., and Presley, T.J., 2012. Female board presence and the likelihood of financial restatement. Accounting Horizons, 26 (4), 607–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiram, D., Bozanic, Z., Cox, J.D., Dupont, Q., Karpoff, J.M., and Sloan, R., 2018. Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 23, 732–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C.S., Jagolinzer, A.D., and Larcker, D.F., 2010. Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research, 48, 225–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C.S., Larcker, A.D., Ormazabal, G., and Taylor, D.J., 2013. The relation between equity incentives and misreporting: the role of risk-taking incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 109, 327–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M.S., Hermanson, D.R., Carcello, J.V., and Neal, T.L., 2010. Fraudulent financial reporting: 1998–2007: an analysis of U.S. public companies. In Association Sections, Divisions, Boards, Teams. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Historical Collection, 453. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_assoc/453.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstresser, D. and Philippon, T., 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (3), 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernthal, P.R. and Insko, C.A., 1993. Cohesion without groupthink: the interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organizational Management, 18 (1), 66–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruynseels, L. and Cardinaels, E., 2014. The audit committee: management watchdog or personal friend of the CEO? The Accounting Review, 89 (1), 113–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, N. and Kedia, S., 2006. The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (1), 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A.W. and Gurun, U.G., 2012. Educational networks, mutual fund voting patterns, and CEO compensation. Review of Financial Studies, 25 (8), 2533–2562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron, A.V. and Chelladurai, P., 1981. Cohesiveness as a factor in sport performance. International Review of Sport Sociology, 16 (2), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., Lee, J., and Shevlin, T., 2016. Internal governance and real earnings management. The Accounting Review, 91 (4), 1051–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., and Malloy, C.J., 2008. The small world of investing: board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 951–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., and Malloy, C.J., 2010. Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65 (4), 1409–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J.L., Daniel, N.D., and Naveen, L., 2006. Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 431–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core, J. and Guay, W., 2002. Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 613–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, D.P., Karan, V., and Stuart, I., 2009. Three threats to validity of choice-based and matched-sample studies in accounting research. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26 (2), 477–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoskey, D.G., Luo, Y., and Zhou, L., 2019. CEO power, board oversight, and earnings announcement tone. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52, 657–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P.M., Ge, W., Larson, C.R., and Sloan, R.G., 2011. Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, 17–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., and Sweeney, A.P., 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dichev, I., Graham, J., Harvey, C.R., and Rajgopal, S., 2013. Earnings quality: evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T.A. and Gangl, M., 2004. Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34, 271–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, A.K., Mallawaarachchi, I., and Alvarado, L.A., 2017. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method. Statistics in Medicine, 36, 2187–2205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberg, J., Gao, P., and Parsons, C.A., 2013. The price of a CEO’s rolodex. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 79–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, M., Ge, W., Luo, S., and Shevlin, T., 2011. Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Free, C. and Murphy, P.R., 2015. The ties that bind: the decision to co-offend in fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32, 18–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., 1993. Group cohesiveness: a critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4 (1), 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A. and Hains, S.C., 1998. Friendship and group identification: a new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, J. and Xuan, Y., 2014. Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics, 112 (3), 344–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I.L., 1972. Victims of Groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I.L., 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K., 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. F. and G. Lee. 2017. Corporate fraud and external social connectedness of independent directors. Journal of Corporate Finance 45, 401–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, R., Li, M., Ling, Z., and Zhang, Y., 2019. Social connections within executive teams and management forecasts. Management Science, 65 (1), 439–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedia, S. and Philippon, T., 2009. The economics of fraudulent accounting. Review of Financial Studies, 22 (6), 2169–2199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, V., Kim, E.H., and Lu, Y., 2015. CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. The Journal of Finance, 70 (3), 1203–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G.V., Raman, K.K., Yang, K., and Yu, W., 2011. CFO/CEO-board social ties, Sarbanes-Oxley, and earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 25 (3), 537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, Y.F. and Lee, G., 2017. Corporate fraud and external social connectedness of independent directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 401–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, Y.F., Liu, X.K., Paruchuri, S., and Qin, B., 2020. CFO social ties to non-CEO senior managers and financial restatements. Accounting and Business Research, 52 (2), 115–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever, Edward, Alistair Anderson, and Sarah Jack. 2014. Social embeddedness in entrepreneurship research: The importance of context and community. In Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship edited by Elizabeth Chell and Mine Karatas-Ozkan. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• McNichols, M. and Stubben, S.R., 2008. Does earnings management affect firms’ investment decisions? The Accounting Review, 83 (6), 1571–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, A.M., Simon, R., and Pfeiffer, R.M., 2005. Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 21 (15), 3301–3307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead, G., Neck, C.P., and West, M.S., 1998. The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: the relevance of groupthink for the 21st century. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73 (2/3), 327–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntayi, J.M., Byabashaija, W., Eyaa, S., Ngoma, M., and Muliira, A., 2010. Social cohesion, groupthink and ethical behavior of public procurement officers. Journal of Public Procurement, 10 (1), 68–92.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B.H., 1974. The Nixon group. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccobono, F., Bruccoleri, M., and Grobler, A., 2016. Groupthink and project performance: the influence of personal traits and interpersonal ties. Production and Operations Management, 25 (4), 609–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. T., and Tuna, I., 2005. Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of accounting and economics, 39 (3), 437–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., Young, J., and Power, M., 2017. Themed section on financial accounting as social and organizational practice: exploring the work of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 35–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., 2002. Observational Studies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Series in Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., and Rubin, D.A., 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70 (1), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipman, J.E., Swanquist, Q.T., and Whited, R.L., 2017. Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 92 (1), 213–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, R.R., 1992. Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 651–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbart, P.J., Raschke, R.L., Gal, G., and Dilla, W.N., 2018. The influence of a good relationship between the internal audit and information security functions on information security outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 71, 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P.E., 1979. Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1314–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J.W., 2010. Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H., 1993. Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar