Key interventions and quality indicators for quality improvement of STEMI care: a RAND Delphi survey

References

• Kristensen SD, Laut KG, Fajadet J, et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1957–1970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale CP. Inequalities in reperfusion therapy for STEMI. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016;2:4–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys MJ, de Meester A, Convens C, et al. Contemporary mortality differences between primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:544–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jernberg T, Johanson P, Held C, et al. Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2011;305:1677–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta RH, Chen AY, Alexander KP, et al. Doing the right things and doing them the right way: association between hospital guideline adherence, dosing safety, and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2015;131:980–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–e140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Brindis RG, Chaitman BR, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical data standards (writing committee to develop acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease clinical data standards). Circulation. 2013;127:1052–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan WV, Pearson TA, Bennett GC, et al. ACC/AHA special report: clinical practice guideline implementation strategies: a summary of systematic reviews by the NHLBI implementation science work rroup. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;135:e122–ee37.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Cardiology. The ACC Quality Improvement for Institutions program 2013; Washington (DC): American College of Cardiology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn EA, Kerr EA. Creating safe harbors for quality measurement innovation and improvement. JAMA. 2016;315:129–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, et al. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295:1912–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI). The breakthrough series. In: Batalden PB, Berwick DM, editors. IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. Cambridge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhaecht K, Panella M, van Zelm R, et al. An overview on the history and concept of care pathways as complex interventions. Int J Care Pathw. 2010; 14:117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson ED, Roe MT, Rumsfeld JS, et al. A call to ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network): a national effort to promote timely clinical feedback and support continuous ouality improvement for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:491–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewijckx C, Decramer M, Sermeus W, et al. Eight-step method to build the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway: the case for COPD exacerbation. Trials. 2012;13:229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atar D, Agewall S. Morphine in myocardial infarction: balancing on the tight rope. Eur Heart J. 2015;37:253–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming WE. The new economics for industry, government, education. Cambridge (MA): MIT-CAES; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss DJ, Shanteau J. Empirical assessment of expertise. Hum Factors. 2003;45:104–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle BL, Li S, Lofthus DM, et al. Targeted versus standard feedback: results from a randomized quality improvement trial. Am Heart J. 2015;169:132–141.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Berdan LG, et al. Good clinical practice guidance and pragmatic clinical trials: balancing the best of both worlds. Circulation. 2016;133:872–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London, Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kontos MC, Rennyson SL, Chen AY, et al. The association of myocardial infarction process of care measures and in-hospital mortality: a report from the NCDR®). Am Heart J. 2014;168:766–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen SS, Fajadet J, Di Mario C, et al. Implementation of primary angioplasty in Europe: Stent for Life initiative progress report. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiele F, Gale CP, Bonnefoy E, et al. Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;6:34–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliprandi-Costa B, Sockler J, Kritharides L, et al. The contribution of the composite of clinical process indicators as a measure of hospital performance in the management of acute coronary syndromes—insights from the CONCORDANCE registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3:37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raleigh V, Thompson J, Jabbal J, et al. Patients experience of using hospital services. London: Picker Institute Europe; 2015;
   Google Scholar
• Lodewijckx C, Sermeus W, Panella M, et al. Quality indicators for in-hospital management of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of an international Delphi study. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:348–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uphoff EP, Wennekes L, Punt CJ, et al. Development of generic quality indicators for patient-centered cancer care by using a RAND modified Delphi method. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35:29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell SM, Hann M, Roland MO, et al. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. Med Care.1999;37:964–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenko E, Ricci B, Kedev S, et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in Eastern Europe: the ISACS-TC registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016;2:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar