References
- Gomes A, Glaudemans AWJM, Touw DJ, et al. Diagnostic value of imaging in infective endocarditis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):e1–e14. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30141-4.
- Hurrell H, Roberts-Thomson R, Prendergast BD. Non-infective endocarditis. Heart. 2020;106(13):1023–1029. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315204.
- Ho G, Bhatia P, Mehta I, et al. Prevalence and short-term clinical outcome of mobile thrombi detected on transvenous leads in patients undergoing lead extraction. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(6):657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.01.007.
- Sadek MM, Cooper JM, Schaller RD. Lead-adherent echodensities: the rule rather than the exception! JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(7):867. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.04.014.
- Sadek MM, Cooper JM, Frankel DS, et al. Utility of intracardiac echocardiography during transvenous lead extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(12):1779–1785. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.08.023.
- Sugrue A, DeSimone CV, Lenz CJ, et al. Mobile thrombus on cardiac implantable electronic device leads of patients undergoing cardiac ablation: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;46(2):115–120. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0085-2.
- Supple GE, Ren JF, Zado ES, et al. Mobile thrombus on device leads in patients undergoing ablation: identification, incidence, location, and association with increased pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Circulation. 2011;124(7):772–778. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.028647.