Aortic Graft Infection What Have we Learned During the Last Decades ?

References

• Bunt T. J. Synthetic vascular graft infections I. Graft infections. Surgery, 1983, 93 (6): 733–746.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett J. W., Marshall D. M., Petterson T. M., Gray D. T., Bower T. C., Cherry K. J. et al. Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year population based experience. J Vasc Surg, 1997, 25: 277–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyk D., Berni G., Thiele B. et al. Aortofemoral graft infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Arch Surg, 1984, 119: 102108.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff L. K., Hollier L. H., Van Peenen H. J., Melton L. J., Pairolero P. C., Cherry K. J. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair combined with a second surgical procedure-morbidity and mortality. Surgery, 1984, 95 (4): 487–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst C., Campbell C. Jr., Daugherty M. etal. Incidence and significance of intra-operative bacterial cultures during abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy. Ann Surg, 1977, 185 (6): 626–633.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth G., Rubin J., McIntyre K. et al. The relevance of arterial wall microbiology to the treatment of prosthetic graft infections: graft infections vs. arterial infections. J Vasc Surg, 1984, 1: 750–756.
   Google Scholar
• Scobie K., McPhail N., Barber G. et al. Bacteriologic monitoring in abdominal aortic surgery. Can J Surg, 1979, 22 (4): 328–371.
   Google Scholar
• Downs A. R., Guzman R., Formichi M., Courbier R., Jausseran J. M., Branchereau A. et al. Etiology of prosthetic anastomotic false aneurysms: pathologic and structural evaluation in 26 cases. Can J Surg, 1991: 34(1): 53–8.
   Google Scholar
• Young R. M., Cherry K. J., Davis M. D., Gloviczki P., Bower T. C., Panneton J. M. et al. The results of in situ prosthetic replacement for infected aortic grafts. Am J Surg, 1999, 178: 136–140.
   Google Scholar
• Landrenau M. D., Raju S. Infections after elective bypass surgery for lower limb ischemia: the influence of preoperative transcutaneous angiography. Surgery, 1981, 90: 956–961.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser A. B., Clayson K. R., Mulherin J. L. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery. Ann Surg, 1978, 188 (3): 283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Chervu A., Moore W. S., Gelabert H. A. et al. Prevention of graft infection by use of prosthesis bonded with a rifampin/collagen release system. J Vasc Surg, 1991, 14: 521–525.
   Google Scholar
• Gahtan V., Esses G., Bandyk D. et al. Antistaphylococcal activity of rifampin-bonded gelatin-impregnated Dacron grafts. J Surg Res, 1995, 58: 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Goeau-Brissonniere O., Mercier F., Nicolas M. H. et al. Treatment of vascular graft infection by in situ replacement with a rifampin-bonded gelatin-sealed Dacron graft. J Vasc Surg, 1994, 19: 739–744.
   Google Scholar
• D’Addato M., Curti T., Freyrie A., and the Italian Investigators Group. Prophylaxis of graft infection with rifampin-bonded gelseal graft: 2-year follow up of a prospective clinical trial. Cardiovasc Surg, 1996, 4 (2): 200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyk D. F., Novotney M. L., Johnson B. L., Back M. R., Roth S. R. Use of rifampin-soaked gelatin-sealed polyester grafts for in situ replacement treatment of primary aortic and vascular prosthetic infections. J Surg Res, 2001, 95: 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyk D. F. In situ replacement with autologous vein or rifampin-bonded polyester can be the best treatment for aortic graft infection. In: 28th Global Vascular and Endovascular Issues, Techniques and Horizons, Veith International Symposium Abstract book, 2001, XIX: 4.1-4.5.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly L. M., Stoney R. J., Goldstone J. et al. Improved management of aortic graft infection: the influence of operation sequence and staging. J Vasc Surg, 1987, 5: 521.
   Google Scholar
• Bunt T. J. Vascular graft infections: a personal experience. Cardiovasc Surg, 1993, 1: 489.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnert T., Gruber H. P., Maeder N. et al. Management of primary aortic graft infection by extra-anatomic bypass reconstruction. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1993, 7: 301.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara P. J., Hertzer N. R., Beven E. G. et al. Surgical management of infected abdominal aortic grafts: review of a 25-year experience. J Vasc Surg, 1986, 3: 725.
   Google Scholar
• Ricotta J. J., Faggioli G. L., Stella A. et al. Total excision and extra-anatomic bypass for aortic graft infection. Am J Surg, 1991, 162: 145.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager R. A., Moneta G. L., Taylor L. M. et al. Improving survival and limb salvage in patients with aortic graft infection. Am J Surg, 1990, 159: 466.
   Google Scholar
• Quinones-Baldrich W. J., Hernandez J. J., Moore W. S. et al. Long-term results following surgical management of aortic graft infection. Arch Surg, 1991, 126: 507–511.
   Google Scholar
• Oderich G. S., Panneton J. M., Bower T. C., Cherry K. J., Rowland C. M., Noel A. A. et al. Infected aortic aneurysm: aggressive presentation, complicated early outcome, but durable results. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 34: 900–908.
   Google Scholar
• Clagett G. P., Valentine R. J., Hagino R. T. et al. Autologous aortoiliac/femoral reconstruction from superficial femoropopliteal veins: feasibility and durability. J Vasc Surg, 1997, 25: 255.
   Google Scholar
• Kieffer E., Bahnini A., Koskas F. et al. In situ allograft replacement of infected infrarenal aortic prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg, 1993, 17 (2): 349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt P. R., Brunner-La Rocca H. P., Carrel T., von Segesser L. K., Ruef C., Debatin J. et al. Cryopreserved arterial allografts in the treatment of major vascular infections: a comparison with conventional surgical techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998, 116: 965–972.
   Google Scholar
• Noel A. A., Gloviczki P., Cherry K. J., Safi H., Goldstone J., Morasch M. D. et al. Aortic reconstruction in infected fields: early results of the United States Cryopreserved Aortic Allograft (USCAA) Registry. Presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society, Chicago, IL, 2001.
   Google Scholar