Filling Sensations after Restorative Proctocolectomy

References

• Thayer M. L., Madoff R. D., Jacobs D. M., Bubrick M. P. Comparative intrinsic and extrinsic compliance characteristics of S, J and W pouches. Dis Colon Rectum, 1991, 34: 404–8.
   Google Scholar
• Williams N. S., Marzouk Demm, Hallan R. I., Waldron D. J. Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg, 1989, 76: 1168–71.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge J. M., Wexner S. D., Morgado P. J. Jr., James K., Nogueras J. J., Jagelman D. G. Optimization of sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure. A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 1994, 37: 419–23.
   Google Scholar
• Reily W. T., Pemberton J. H., Wolff B. G. et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg, 1997, 225: 666–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gozetti G., Poggioli G., Marchetti F. et al. Functional outcome in handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg, 1994, 168: 325–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wexner S. D., James K., Jagelman D. G. The double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. A prospective review of sphincter function and clinical outcome. Dis Colon Rectum, 1991, 34: 487–94.
   Google Scholar
• Broens P. M. A, Penninckx F. M., Lestar B., Kerremans R. P. The trigger for rectal filling sensation. Int J Colorectal Dis, 1994, 9: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kerremans R. Morphological and physiological aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Brussels: Edition Arscia SA., 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Penninckx F. M., Lestar B., Kerremans R. P. A new balloon-retaining test for evaluation of anorectal function in incontinent patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 1989, 32: 202–5.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker S. J., Phillips S. F., Dozois R. R., Kelly K. A., Beart R. W. Jr. Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Ann Surg, 1986, 203: 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Takao Y., Weiss E. G., Nogueras J. J., Wexner S. D. Should ileoanal pouch surgery be denied to patients with low resting pressures ? Am Surg, 1997, 63: 726–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein C. N., Rollandelli R., Niazi N. et al. Characterization of afferent mechanisms in ileoanal pouches. Am J Gastroenterol, 1997, 92: 103–8.
   Google Scholar
• Keighley M. R., Yoshioka K., Kmiot W., Heyen F. Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg, 1988, 75: 9971002.
   Google Scholar
• Poos R. J., Frank J., Bittner R., Beger H. G. Influence of age and sex on anal sphincters: manometric evaluation of anorectal continence. Eur Surg Res, 1986, 18: 343–8.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh S. M., Diamant N. E. Effect of age, gender and parity on anal canal pressures. Dig Dis Sci, 1987, 32: 726–36.
   Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma R. J. F., Gort G., Meuwissen S. G. M. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology, 1991, 38: 444–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rao S. S. C., Hatfield R., Soffer E., Rao S., Beaty J., Conklin J. L. Manometric tests of anorectal function in healty adults. Am J Gastroenterol, 1999, 94: 773–83.
   Google Scholar
• Öresland T., Fasth S., Akervall S., Nordgren S., Hulten L. Manovolumetric and sensory characteristics of the ileoanal J pouch compared with healty rectum. Br J Surg, 1990, 77: 8036.
   Google Scholar
• Annibali R., Öresland T., Hulten L. Does the level of stapled ileoanal anastomosis influence physiologic and functional outcome ? Dis Colon Rectum, 1994, 37: 321–9.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg P. A., Kamm M. A., Nicholls R. J., Morris G., Britton K. E. Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function. Gut, 1997, 40: 790–3.
   Google Scholar