Redo Valve Surgery Nowadays: What Have we Learned ?

References

• Biglioli P., Di Matteo S., Parolari A., Antona C., Arena V., Sala A. Re-operative cardiac valve surgery: a multivariable analysis of risk factors. Cardiovasc Surg, 1994, 2 (2): p. 216–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn L. H., Aranki S. F., Rizzo R. J. et al. Decrease in operative risk of re-operative valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 1993, 56 (1): p. 15–20; discussion 20–1.
   Google Scholar
• Pansini S., Ottino G., Forsennati P. G. et al. Re-operations on heart valve prostheses: an analysis of operative risks and late results. Ann Thorac Surg, 1990, 50 (4): p. 590–6.
   Google Scholar
• Magovern J. A., Sakert T., Benckart D. H. et al. A model for predicting transfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg, 1996, 61 (1): p. 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ottino G., De Paulis R., Pansini S. et al. Major sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery: a multivariate analysis of risk factors in 2,579 consecutive operative procedures. Ann Thorac Surg, 1987, 44 (2): p. 173–9.
   Google Scholar
• Valla J., Corbineau H., Langanay T. et al. [Mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. A 10-year evaluation (1985–1995)]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris), 1996, 45 (7): p. 369–76.
   Google Scholar
• Macartney F. J., Scott O., Ionescu M. I. Late haemodynamic results of fascia lata reconstruction of the right ventricular outlet. Am Heart J, 1975, 89 (2): p. 195–9.
   Google Scholar
• Senning A., Rothlin M. The late fate of autologous fascia lata valve grafts in the aortic position. Isr J Med Sci, 1975, 11 (2–3): p. 179–84.
   Google Scholar
• Magilligan D. J. Jr., Lewis J. W. Jr., Tilley B., Peterson E. The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1985, 89 (4): p. 499–507.
   Google Scholar
• Foster A. H., Greenberg G. J., Underhill D. J., McIntosh C. L., Clark R. E. Intrinsic failure of Hancock mitral bioprostheses: 10-to 15-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg, 1987, 44 (6): p. 568–77.
   Google Scholar
• Akins C. W., Carroll D. L., Buckley M. J., Daggett W. M., Hilgenberg A. D., Austen W. G. Late results with Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. Circulation, 1990, 82 (5 Suppl): p. iV65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier L. C., Carrier M., Leclerc Y., Lepage G., deGuise P., Dyrda I. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: a comparison of late results in 1,593 patients. Ann Thorac Surg, 1989, 47 (3): p. 352–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi Y., Matuzaki K., Tominaga R., Yasui H., Tokunaga K. The risks of re-operation for prosthetic valve dysfunction. Surg Today, 1994, 24 (5): p. 415–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pellerin M., Mihaileanu S., Couetil J. P. et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position: long-term follow-up 1980 to 1994. Ann Thorac Surg, 1995, 60 (2 Suppl): p. S292-5; discussion S295–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tyers G. F., Jamieson W. R., Munro A. I. et al. Re-operation in biological and mechanical valve populations: fate of the re-operative patient. Ann Thorac Surg, 1995, 60 (2 Suppl): p. S464–8; discussion S468–9.
   Google Scholar
• Antunes M. J., Magalhaes M. P. Isolated replacement of a prosthesis or a bioprosthesis in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol, 1987, 59 (4): p. 346–9.
   Google Scholar
• Caus T., Mesana T., Mouly A., Guez P., Tapia M., Monties J. R. [Repeated heart valve replacements: prognosis and results]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 1995, 88 (1): p. 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn L. H., Koster J. K. Jr., VandeVanter S., Collins J. J. Jr. The in-hospital risk of re-replacement of dysfunctional mitral and aortic valves. Circulation, 1982, 66 (2 Pt 2): p. i153–6.
   Google Scholar
• Husebye D. G., Pluth J. R., Piehler J. M. et al. Re-operation on prosthetic heart valves. An analysis of risk factors in 552 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1983, 86 (4): p. 543–52.
   Google Scholar
• Terada Y., Wanibuchi Y., Takagi H., Shimoyama Y., Ino T., Furuta S. [Report of 108 patients with valvular heart disease who underwent re-operations through repeated median sternotomy incision]. Kyobu Geka, 1989, 42 (6): p. 426–30, discussion 4313.
   Google Scholar
• Bortolotti U., Milano A., Mossuto E., Mazzaro E., Thiene G., Casarotto D. Early and late outcome after re-operation for prosthetic valve dysfunction: analysis of 549 patients during a 26-year period. J Heart Valve Dis, 1994, 3 (1): p. 81–7.
   Google Scholar
• David T. E. Re-operations on the aortic valve combined with replacement of the ascending aorta. J Card Surg, 2001, 17 (1): p. 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Beghi C., De Cicco G., Nicolini F., Ballore L., Reverberi C., Gherli T. Cardiac valve re-operations: analysis of operative risk factors in 154 patients. J Heart Valve Dis, 2002, 11 (2): p. 25862.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn L. H., Peigh P. S., Sell J., DiSesa V. J. Right thoracotomy, femorofemoral bypass, and deep hypothermia for re-replacement of the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg, 1989, 48 (1): p. 69–71.
   Google Scholar
• Nashef S.A., Roques F., Michel P., Gauducheau E., Lemeshow S., Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999, 16 (1): p. 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Merlo C., Aidala E., La Scala E. et al. Mortality and morbidity in re-operation compared with first intervention in coronary revas-cularization. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2001, 42 (6): p. 713–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fundaro P., Santoli C. Towards an easier and safer re-operation of the atrioventricular valves: the right anterolateral thoracotomy approach without pericardial dissection. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1989, 30 (5): p. 779–81.
   Google Scholar
• Yaginuma G., Ottomo M., Abe K. et al. Mitral exposure technique for redo cardiac surgery. A left mediastinal pleurotomy and minimal adhesiotomy method. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2001, 42 (4): p. 501–3.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl J. T., Eichhorn E. J., Konstam M. A. et al. Efficacy of retrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg, 1988, 45 (6): p. 595–602.
   Google Scholar
• Eichhorn E. J., Diehl J. T., Konstam M. A., Payne D. D., Salem D. N., Cleveland R. J. Protective effects of retrograde compared with antegrade cardioplegia on right ventricular systolic and diastolic function during coronary bypass surgery. Circulation, 1989, 79 (6): p. 1271–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sirivella S., Gielchinsky I., Parsonnet V. Management of catheter-induced pulmonary artery perforation: a rare complication in cardiovascular operations. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001. 72(6): p. 2056–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M. J., Chen T. L., Huang C. H., Chao A., Chu S. H. Difference in efficacy of the Cell Saver in coronary bypass grafting surgery and cardiac valvular re-operations. J Formos Med Assoc, 1994, 93 (2): p. 117–21.
   Google Scholar
• Royston D., Bidstrup B. P., Taylor K. M., Sapsford R. N. Effect of aprotinin on the need for blood transfusion after repeat open-heart surgery. Lancet, 1987, 2 (8571): p. 1289–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bidstrup B. P., Royston D., Sapsford R. N., Taylor K. M. Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high dose aprotinin (Trasylol). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1989. 97 (3): p. 364–72.
   Google Scholar
• Dobell A. R., Jain A. K. Catastrophic haemorrhage during redo sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 1984, 37 (4): p. 273–8.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien M.F., Harrocks S., Clarke A., Garlick B., Barnett A.G. How to do safe sternal re-entry and the risk factors of redo cardiac surgery: a 21-year review with zero major cardiac injury. J Card Surg, 2002, 17 (1): p. 4–13.
   Google Scholar