Cerebral Protection During Percutaneous Carotid Intervention: wich Device Should Be Used ?

References

• Timsit S. G., Sacco R. L., Mohr J. P. et al. Early clinical differentiation of cerebral infarction from severe atherosclerotic stenosis and cardioembolism. Stroke, 1992, 23: 486–91.
   Google Scholar
• Eastcott H. H., Pickering G. W., Rob C. G. Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet, 1954, 267: 994–6.
   Google Scholar
• Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med, 1991, 325: 445–53.
   Google Scholar
• Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998, 351: 1379–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kachel R. Results of balloon angioplasty in the carotid arteries. JEndovasc Surg, 1996, 3: 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Roubin G. S., New G., Iyer S. S. et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation, 2001, 103: 532–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey M. H., Al-Mubarek N. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 60: 259–66.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan Jr W. D., Voellinger D. C., Doblar D. D., Plyushcheva N. P., Fisher W. S., Mcdowell H. A. Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angio-plasty versus carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999, 7: 33–8.
   Google Scholar
• Veith F. J., Amor M, Ohki T. et al. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33: S111–6.
   Google Scholar
• Theron J., Courtheoux P., Alachkar F., Bouvard G., Maiza D. New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1990, 11: 869–74, discussion 75–7.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald S., Gaines P. A. Current concepts of mechanical cerebral protection during precutaneous carotid intervention. Vasc Med, 2003, 8: 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ohki T., Veith F. J. Carotid artery stenting: utility of cerebral protection devices. J Invasive Cardiol, 2001, 13: 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Albuquerque F. C., Teitelbaum G. P., Lavine S. D., Larsen D. W., Giannotta S. L. Balloon-protected carotid angioplasty. Neurosurgery, 2000, 46: 918–21, discussion 22–3.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mubarak N., Roubin G. S., Vitek J. J., Iyer S. S., New G., Leon M. B. Effect of the distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation, 2001, 104: 1999–2002.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow P. L., Lylyk P., Londero H. et al. Carotid Artery Stenting Protected With an Emboli Containment System. Stroke, 2002, 33: 1308–14.
   Google Scholar
• Theron J. G., Payelle G. G., Coskun O., Huet H. F., Guimaraens L. Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology, 1996, 201: 627–36.
   Google Scholar
• Adami C. A., Scuro A., Spinamano L. et al. Use of the Parodi anti-embolism system in carotid stenting: Italian trial results. J Endovasc Ther 2002, 9: 147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mubarak N., Colombo A., Gaines P. A. et al. Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002, 39: 841–6.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald S., Venables G., Cleveland T., Gaines P. Protected carotid stenting: Safety and efficacy of the MedNova NeuroShield filter. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2002, 35: 96672.
   Google Scholar
• Angelini A., Reimers B., Della Barbera M. et al. Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris. Stroke, 2002, 33: 456–61.
   Google Scholar
• Reimers B., Corvaja N., Moshiri S. et al. Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation, 2001, 104: 12–5.
   Google Scholar
• Markus H. Monitoring embolism in real time. Circulation, 2000, 102: 826–8.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley F., Stygall J., Lunn S., Harrison M., Brown M. M., Newman S. Comparison of microembolism detected by trans-cranial Doppler and neuropsychological sequelae of carotid surgery and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Stroke, 2000, 31: 1329–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias K. Presentation: protected vs unprotected CAS: a DW-MRI analyses, in ISET, 2002: Miami.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger H. J., Mathias K. D., Drescher R. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001, 22: 1251–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ohki T., Veith F. J., Grenell S. et al. Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36: 1175–85.
   Google Scholar
• Parodi J., La Mura R., Ferreira L. et al. Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral protection devices. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2000, 32: 1127–36.
   Google Scholar