Lessons Learnt from Carotid Artery Trials

References

• North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med, 1991, 325: 445–453.
   Google Scholar
• European Carotid Surgery Trialists’Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results for the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998, 351: 1379–87.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P., Eliasziw M., Gutnickov S. et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 2003, 361: 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberg M., Wilson E., Yatsu F. et al. for the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. Carotid endarterectomy and ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. JAMA, 1991, 266: 3289–94.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett H., Taylor D., Eliasziw M., Fox A., Ferguson G et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy. Trial collaborators. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339: 1415–1425.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor A., Rothwell P., Bell P. Overview of the principal results and secondary analyses from the European and North American randomized trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur J Vac Endovasc Surg, 2003, 26: 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone R., Brown M., Coward J., less Investigators. international carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomized clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004, 18: 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ringleb P., Kunze A., Allenberg J. et al. Steering comittee of the SPACE Study. The stent supported percutaneous angioplasty of the carotid artery versus endartrerectomy trial. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004, 18: 66–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R., Howard V., Robin G. et al. CREST—investigators. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30 days stroke and death rate in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 40: 1106–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J., Chatelier G., Beyssen B. Carotid angioplasty and stent-ing with and without cerebral protection. Clinical alert from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke, 2004, 35: 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme H., Limet R. Analyse des résultats des principales études randomisées d’endartérectomie carotidienne pour sténose asymptomatique. Rev Med Lg, 2005, 60: 811–813.
   Google Scholar
• Halm E., Chassin M., Tuhrim S., Hollier L et al. Revisiting appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke, 2003, 34: 1464–1472.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Comittee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AÇAS). JAMA, 1995, 273: 1421–1428.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday A., Lansfeld A., Marro D. et al. MRÇ-Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004, 363: 1491–1502.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung B., Lauder I., Kumana C. Meta-analysis of large randomised controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2004, 57: 64069.
   Google Scholar
• Hankey G., Sudlow C., Dunbabin D. Thienopyridine derivates versus ASA for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients. Cochrane Library Update, 2001, issue 1.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav J., Wholey M., Kuntz R. et al. Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high risk for endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351: 1493–1501.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley S., White R., Dietrich E., Fogarty T., Zarins C., Hopkins L. et al. Carotid revascularisation using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CARESS): phase 1 clinical trial. J Endovasc Ther, 2003, 10: 1021–1030.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P., Eliasziw M., Gutnikow S., Warlow C., Barnett H., for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists Collaboration. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet, 2004, 363: 915924.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson G., Eliasziw M., Barr H., Clagett G., Barnes P., Walace Ç. et al. The NASCET trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke, 1999, 30: 1751–1758.
   Google Scholar
• Bond R., Narayan S., Rothwell P., Warlow C. Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2002, 23: 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Halm E., Hannan E., Rojas M., Tuhrim S., Riles T., Rockman C., Chassin M. Clinical and operative predictors of outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 42: 420–428.
   Google Scholar
• Perler B., Dardik A., Burleyson G., Gordon T., Williams G. influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a statewide analysis of 9918 cases. J Vasc Surg, 1998, 27: 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stanziale S., Marone L., Boules T., Brimmeier j., Hill K., Makaroun M., Wholey M. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 43: 297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme H., Lacroix H., Desiron Q., Nevelsteen A., Limet R., Suy R. Carotid surgery in octogenarians: is it worthwhile ? Acta Chir Belg, 1996, 96: 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rockman C. Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion. Sem Vasc Surg, 2004, 17: 224–229.
   Google Scholar
• Narins C., Illig K. Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: a systemic review. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 661–672.
   Google Scholar
• North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCHT) steering Comittee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics and progress. Stroke, 1991, 22: 711–720.
   Google Scholar
• CAVATAS-investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet, 2001, 357: 1729–1737.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparis A., Ricotta L., Cuadra S. et al. High-risk carotid endarterectomy: fact or fiction ? J Vasc Surg, 2003, 37: 4046.
   Google Scholar
• Mozes G., Sullivan T., Torres-Russoto D. et al. Carotid endarterectomy in “SAPPHIRE-eligible” high-risk patients: implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39: 958–965.
   Google Scholar
• Lepore M., Sternbergh C., Salartash K., Tonnessen B., Money S. Influence of NASCET/AÇAS trial eligibility on outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 34: 581586.
   Google Scholar
• Paciaroni M., Eliasziw M., Kappelle L. et al. Medical complications associated with carotid endarterectomy. North-American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterctomy Trial (NASCET). Stroke, 1999, 30: 1759–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bell P. Limitations to the value of the SAPPHIRE trial. Acta Chir Belg, 2006, 106: 141–143.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich E., Ndiaye M., Reid B. Stenting in the carotid artery. Initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg, 1996, 3: 4262.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan W., Voellinger D., Doblar D., Plyushcheva N., Fisher W., McDowell H. Microemboli detected by transcranial doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovasc Surg, 1999, 7: 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cremonesi A., Manetti R., Castriota F., Setacci F., Stacci C. Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke, 2003, 34: 1936–1940.
   Google Scholar
• Powell R., Alessi Ch., Nolan B. et al. Comparison of embolization protection device-specific technical difficulties during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gray W., Hopkins N., Yadav S. et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 258–269.
   Google Scholar
• Eskandari M. Cerebral embolic protection. Semin Vasc Surg, 2005, 18: 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert B., Zeumer H. Carotid artery stenting with or without protection devices ? Strong opinions, poor evidence ! Stroke, 2003, 34: 1941–1943.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer f., Lacroix V., Duprez T., Grandin C., Verhelst R., Peeters A., Çosnard G. Cerebral microembolization after protected carotid artery stenting in surgical high risk patients: results of a 2-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 42: 847–853.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer S., Prins N., den Heijer T., Hofman A., Koudstaal P., Breteler M. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348: 1215–1222.
   Google Scholar
• Cantelmo N., Babikian V., Samazaweera R., Gordon J., Pochay V., Winter M. Cerebral microembolisation and ischemic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 1998, 27: 1024–1031.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J. L., Chatellier G., Beyssen B., Branchereau A., Moulin Th., Becquemin J. P. et al. for the EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus Stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355: 1660–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneux L., Cleemput I., Ramaekers D. (KCE). PCAS: protected carotid artery stenting: a short medical technology assessment. Acta Chir Belg, 2005, 105: 436–441.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R. Carotid stenting: should it replace endarteretomy in higher-risk patients ? Seminars Vasc Surg, 2006, 19: 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. N Engl J Med, 1991, 325: 445–453.
   Google Scholar
• European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results for the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998, 351: 1379–87.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P., Eliasziw M., Gutnickov S. et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 2003, 361: 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberg M., Wilson E., Yatsu F. et al. for the Veterans Affairs Co-operative Studies Programme 309 Trialist Group. Carotid endarterectomy and ischaemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. JAMA, 1991, 266: 3289–94.
   Google Scholar