7
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Papers

MR is/is not a useful diagnostic tool for breast cancer management

, , &
Pages 267-270 | Published online: 11 Mar 2016

References

  • Heywang-Kobrunner S. H. Brustkrebsdiagnostik mit MR: überblick nach 1250 patienten. Elektromedica, 1993, 61: 43–52.
  • Viehweg P., Lampe D., Buchmann J., Heywang-Kobrunner S. H. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MAGMA, 2000, 11: 129–37.
  • EORTC Breast Cancer Group. EORTC Guidelines. Manual for clinical research in breast cancer. London: Greenwich Medical Media, 2004.
  • Bloomington M. N. Diagnosis of breast disease. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), 2005. Recommendations of the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI).
  • Technology Evaluation Centre. Breast MRI for the detection or diagnosis of primary or recurrent breast cancer Assess Program, 2004, 19 (1).
  • Hrung J. M., Sonnad S. S., Schwartz J. S., Langlotz C. P. Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol, 1999, 6 (7): 387–97.
  • Schnall M. D., Blume J., Bluemke D. A., Deangelis G. A., Debruhl N., Harms S. et al. MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol, 2005, 92: 32–8.
  • Schelfout K., Van Goethem M., Kersschot E. et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and the effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004 Jun, 30: 501–7.
  • Van Goethem M., Schelfout K., Kersschot E., Colpaert C., Verslegers I., Biltjes I. et al. MR mammography is useful in the pre-operative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with an extensive intraductal component. Eur J Radiol, 2007 (11).
  • Liberman L., Morris E., Kim C. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. 2003 Feb, 180 (2): 333–41.
  • Weinstein S. P., Orel S. G., Heller R., Reynolds C., Czerniecki B., Solin L. J. et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 176 (2): 399–406.
  • Bedrosian I., Mick R., Orel S. G., Schnall M., Reynolds C., Spitz F. R. et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma on pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer, 2003, 98 (3): 468–73.
  • Rodenko G. N., Harms S. E., Pruneda J. M., Farrell R. S., Jr., Evans W. P., Copit D. S. et al. MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 167 (6): 1415–9.
  • Schelfout K., Van Goethem M., Kersschot E., Verslegers I., Biltjes I., Leyman P. et al. Pre-operative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14 (7): 1209–16.
  • Frei K. A., Bonel H. M., Pelte M. F., Hylton N. M., Kinkel K. Paget disease of the breast: findings at magnetic resonance imaging histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol, 2005, 40 (6): 363–7.
  • Van Goethem M., Schelfout K., Kersschot E., Colpaert C., Weyler J., Verslegers I. et al. Comparison of morphologic and kinetic MR imaging features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinomas. JBR-BTR, 2005, 88 (5): 225–32.
  • Solin L. J., Fourquet A., Vicini F. A. et al. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001, 50: 991–1002.
  • Silverstein M. J. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a surgeon’s disease. Ann Surg Oncol, 1999, 6: 802–10.
  • Silverstein M. J., Poller D. N., Waisman J. R. et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Lancet, 1995, 345: 1154–7.
  • Silverstein M. J. The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg, 2003, 186: 337–43.
  • Boland G. P., Chan K. C., Knox W. F., Roberts S. A., Bundred N. J. Value of the Van Nuys Prognostic Index in the prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg, 2003, 90: 426–32.
  • Orel S., Mendonca M. H., Reynolds C., Schnall M., Solin L., Sullivan D. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology, 1997, 202: 413–420.
  • Drew P. J., Kerin M. J., Turnbull L. W., Imrie M., Carleton P. J., Fox J. N. et al. Routine screening for local recurrence, following breast-conserving for cancer, using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol, 1998, 5 (3): 265–70.
  • Orel S. G., Dougherty C. S., Reynolds C., Czerniecki B. J., Siegelman E. S., Schnall M. D. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology, 2000, 216 (1): 248–54.
  • Nakahara H., Namba K., Watanabe R., Furusawa H., Matsu T., Akiyama F. et al. A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer, 2003, 10 (4): 320–9.
  • Kramer S. C., Rieber A., Gorich J., Aschoff A. J., Tomczak R., Merkle E. M. et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol, 2000, 10 (11): 1733–6.
  • Samuels J. B., Rohrich R. J., Weatherall P. T., Ho A. M., Goldberg K. L. Radiographic diagnosis of breast implant rupture: current status and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1995, 96 (4): 865–77.
  • Pfleiderer B., Heindel W. MRI and MR spectroscopy after silicone breast implants in the female breast. Rofo, 2001, 173 (7): 571–9.
  • Middleton M. S. Magnetic resonance evaluation of breast implants and soft-tissue. Top Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1998, 9 (2): 92–137.
  • Cher D. J., Conwell J. A., Mandel J. S. MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: meta-analysis and implications. Ann Plast Surg, 2001, 47 (4): 367–80.
  • Scaranelo A. M., Marques A. F., Smialowski E. B., Lederman H. M. Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings. Sao Paulo Med J, 2004, 122 (2): 41–7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.