Treatment Strategies for Type 2 Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

References

• Brandt M., Walluscheck K. P., Jahnke T., Graw K., Cremer J., Muller-Hulsbeck S. Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Feasibility and Impact on Early Outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005, 16: 1309–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chahwan S., Comerota A. J., Pigott J. P., Scheuermann B. W., Burrow J., Wojnarowski D. Elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with endovascular or open repair: the first decade. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 45: 258–62; discussion 62.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh R. M., Brown L. C., Kwong G. P., Powell J. T., Thompson S. G. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004, 364 (9437) :843–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hellinger J. C. Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre-and postprocedural imaging. Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology. 2005, 8: 2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Veith F. J., Baum R. A., Ohki T., Amor M., Adiseshiah M., Blankensteijn J. D. et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35: 1029–35.
   Google Scholar
• Baum R. A., Stavropoulos S. W., Fairman R. M., Carpenter J. P. Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003, 14: 1111–7.
   Google Scholar
• Stavropoulos S. W., Charagundla S. R. Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Radiology, 2007, 243: 641–55.
   Google Scholar
• Gorich J., Rilinger N., Sokiranski R., Orend K. H., Ermis C., Kramer S. C. et al. Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography. Radiology, 1999, 213: 767–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenblit A. M., Patlas M., Rosenbaum A. T., Okhi T., Veith F. J., Laks M. P. et al. Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of un-enhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. Radiology, 2003, 227: 426–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stavropoulos S. W., Clark T. W., Carpenter J. P., Fairman R. M., Litt H., Velazquez O. C. et al. Use of CT angiography to classify endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005, 16: 663–7.
   Google Scholar
• Haulon S., Willoteaux S., Koussa M., Gaxotte v., Beregi J. P., Warembourg H. Diagnosis and treatment of type II endoleak after stent placement for exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg, 2001, 15: 148–54.
   Google Scholar
• Insko E. K., Kulzer L. M., Fairman R. M., Carpenter J. P., Stavropoulos S. W. MR imaging for the detection of endoleaks in recipients of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with low magnetic susceptibility. Acad Radiol, 2003, 10: 509–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wicky S., Fan C. M., Geller S. C., Greenfield A., Santilli J., Waltman A. C. MR angiography of endoleak with inconclusive concomitant CT angiography. Ajr, 2003, 181: 736–8.
   Google Scholar
• Carrafiello G., Lagana D., Recaldini C., Mangini M., Bertolotti E., Caronno R. et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography in classifying endoleaks after endovascular treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysms: preliminary experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2006, 29: 969–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Z. Diagnostic value of color duplex ultrasonography in the follow-up of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006, 17: 759–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford R. M., Bown M. J., Fishwick G., Murphy F., Naylor M., Sensier Y. et al. Duplex ultrasound scanning is reliable in the detection of endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2006, 32: 537–41.
   Google Scholar
• Stavropoulos S. W., Itkin M., Lakhani P., Carpenter J. P., Fairman R. M., Alavi A. Detection of endoleaks after endovascu-lar aneurysm repair with use of technetium-99m sulfur colloid and (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cell scans. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006, 17: 1739–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mennander A., Pimenoff G., Heikkinen M., Partio T., Zeitlin R., Salenius J. P. Nonoperative approach to endotension. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 42: 194–9.
   Google Scholar
• Silverberg D., Baril D. T., Ellozy S. H., Carroccio A., Greyrose S. E., Lookstein R. A. et al. An 8-year experience with type ii endoleaks: natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 453–9.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz E., Rubin B. G., Sanchez L. A., Choi E. T., Geraghty P. J., Baty J. et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39: 306–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand D. v., White G. H., Wilson S. E. Clinical significance of type ii endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg, 2006, 20: 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Baum R. A., Carpenter J. P., Golden M. A., Velazquez O. C., Clark T. W., Stavropoulos S. W. et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35: 23–9.
   Google Scholar