Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approaches in Abdominal Aortic Surgery

References

• Quinones-Baldrich W. J., Garner C., Caswell D., Ahn S. S., Gelabert H. A., Machleder H. I., Moore W. S. Endovascular, transperitoneal, and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results and costs. J Vasc Surg, 1999 Jul, 30 (1): 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rob C. Extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta. ¡Surgery, 1963 Jan, 53: 87–9.
   Google Scholar
• Grace P. A., Bouchier-Hayes D. Infrarenal abdominal aortic disease: a review of the retroperitoneal approach. Br J Surg, 1991 Jan, 78 (1): 6–9. Review.
   Google Scholar
• Stipa S., Shaw R. S. Aorto-iliac reconstruction through a retroperitoneal approach. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1968 May-Jun, 9 (3): 224–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sicard G. A., Allen B. T., Munn J. S., Anderson C. B. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am, 1989 Aug, 69 (4): 795–806. Review.
   Google Scholar
• Leather R. P., Shah D. M., Kaufman J. L., Fitzgerald K. M., Chang B. B., Feustel P. J. A comparative analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysm. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1989 May, 168 (5): 387–93.
   Google Scholar
• Helsby R., Moossa A. R. Aorto-iliac reconstruction with special reference to the extraperitoneal approach. Br J Surg, 1975 Aug, 62 (8): 596–600.
   Google Scholar
• Taheri S. A., Gawronski S., Smith D. J. Paramedian retroperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta. Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1983 Sep-Oct, 24 (5): 529–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson J. C., Wurm W. H., O’Donnell T. F Jr., Shoenfeld N. A., Mackey W. C., Callow A. D., Su Y. F., Watkins W. D. Haemodynamics and prostacyclin release in the early phases of aortic surgery: a comparison of trans-abdominal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Vasc Surg, 1988 Feb, 7 (2): 190–8.
   Google Scholar
• Abernathy J. Surgical observations. London: Longman and O’Rees. 1804: 209–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dubost C., Allary M., Oeconomos N. Resection of an aneurysm of the aorta. Arch Surg, 1952, 64: 405–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sicard G. A., Reilly J. M., Rubin B. G., Thompson R. W., Allen B. T., Flye M. W., Schechtman K. B., Young-Beyer P., Weiss C., Anderson C. B. Trans-abdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: a report of a prospective randomised trial. J Vasc Surg, 1995 Feb, 21 (2): 174–81; discussion 181–3.
   Google Scholar
• Sicard G. A., Freeman M. B., VanderWoude J. C., Anderson C. B. A comparison between the trans-abdominal and retroperitoneal approach for reconstruction of the infrarenal abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg, 1987 Jan, 5 (1): 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sieunarine K., Lawrence-Brown M. M., Goodman M. A. A comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for infrarenal aortic surgery: early and late results. Cardiovasc Surg, 1997 Feb, 5 (1): 71–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hioki M., Iedokoro Y., Kawamura J., Yamashita Y., Yoshino N., Orii K., Masuda S., Yamashita K., Tanaka S. A left retroperitoneal approach using a retractor to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with the transperitoneal approach. Surg Today, 2002, 32 (7): 577–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cambria R. P., Brewster D. C., Abbott W. M., Freehan M., Megerman J., LaMuraglia G., Wilson R., Wilson D., Teplick R., Davison J. K. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: A randomised prospective study. J Vasc Surg, 1990 Feb, 11 (2): 314–24; discussion 324–5.
   Google Scholar
• Darling C. 3rd, Shah D. M., Chang B. B., Paty P. S., Leather R. P. The current status of the use of a retroperitoneal approach for reconstruction of the aorta and its branches. Ann Surg, 1996 Oct, 224 (4): 501–6; discussion 506–8.
   Google Scholar
• Darling R. C. 3rd., Shah D. M., McClellan W. R., Chang B. B., Leather R. P. Decreased morbidity associated with retroperitoneal exclusion treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1992 Jan-Feb, 33 (1): 65–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory R. T, Wheeler J. R, Snyder S. O, Gayle R. G, Love L. P. The retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1989 Mar-Apr, 30 (2): 185–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard J. L., Yonemoto H., Killeen J. D. Cost-effective aortic exposure: a retroperitoneal experience. Ann Vasc Surg, 2000 Jan, 14 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wachenfeld-Wahl C., Engelhardt M., Gengenbach B., Bruijnen H. K., Loeprecht H., Woelfle K. D. The trans-peritoneal versus the retro-peritoneal approach for the treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: is one superior ? Vasa, 2004 May, 33 (2): 72–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nevelsteen A., Smet G., Weymans M., Depre H., Suy R. Transabdominal or retroperitoneal approach to the aorto-iliac tract: a pulmonary function study. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1988 Aug, 2 (4): 22932.
   Google Scholar
• Laohapensang K., Rerkasem K., Chotirosniramit N. Left retroperitoneal versus midline trans-peritoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (A) repair. J Med Assoc Thai, 2005 May, 88 (5): 601–6.
   Google Scholar
• Honig M. P., Mason R. A., Giron F. Wound complications of the retroperitoneal approach to the aorta and iliac vessels. J Vasc Surg, 1992 Jan, 15 (1): 28–33; discussion 33–4.
   Google Scholar
• Shumacker H. B Jr. Midline extra-peritoneal exposure of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1972 Nov, 135 (5): 791–2.
   Google Scholar
• Endo M., Kobayashi K., Tsubota M., Seki M., Sato H., Noto T., Iwa T. Advantages of using the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Surg Today, 1996, 26 (1): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wasmuth H. H., Rokke O., Abendstein H., Moland J. H., Danielsen S. Abdominal aortic surgery. A transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal approach ? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 1992 Aug 30, 112 (20): 2635–6.
   Google Scholar