Complications and Recurrences after Different Types of Hernia Repair: How to Deal with It ?

References

• Arregui M. E., Young S. B. Groin Hernia Repair by Laparoscopic Techniques: Current Status and Controversies. World J Surg, 2005, 29: 1052–1057.
   Google Scholar
• Totté E., Van Hee R., Kox G., Hendrickx L., Van Zwieten K. J. Surgical Anatomy of the Inguinal Region: Implications during Inguinal Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy. Eur Surg Res, 2005, 37: 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson B., Hallén M., Leveau P., Bergenfelz A., Westerdahl J. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery, 2003, 133 (5): 464–72.
   Google Scholar
• Feliu X., Torres G., Vinas X., Martinez-Rodenas F., Fernandez-Sallent E., Pie J. Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: laparoscopic and open approach. Hernia, 2004, 8 (2): 113–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tran H. M. Gs 06 a prospective non-randomized study of 737 consecutive cases of laparoscopic inguinal/femoral hernia repair: superiority of the laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach by a specialist herniologist. ANZ J Surg, 2007, 77: 127.
   Google Scholar
• Memon M. A., Cooper N. J., Memon B., Memon M. I., Abrams K. R. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg, 2003, 90: 1479–1492.
   Google Scholar
• Feliu X., Jaurrieta E., Vinas X., Macarulla E., Abad J. M., Fernandez-Sallent E. Recurrent inguinal hernia: a ten-year review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2004, 14 (6): 362–7.
   Google Scholar
• Beltran M. A., Cruces K. S. Outcomes of Lichtenstein Hernioplasty for Primary and Recurrent Inguinal Hernia. World J Surg, 2006, 30: 2281–2287.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack K., Wake B., Perez J., Fraser C., Cook J., McIntosch E., Vale L., Grant A. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess, 2005, 9 (14): 1–203.
   Google Scholar
• Awad S. S., Fagan S. P. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg, 2004, 188: 9S-16S.
   Google Scholar
• Berndsen F. H., Petersson U., Arvidsson D., Leijonmar C. K., Rudberg C., Smedberg S., Montgomery A. Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL STUDY group. Hernia, 2007, 11: 307–313.
   Google Scholar
• Go P. M. What is next in inguinal hernia surgery ? Surg Technol Int, 2006, 15: 116–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan J. D., Pappas T. N. Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions. Ann Surg, 2003, 238: S148–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gokalp A., Inal M., Maralcan G., Baskonus I. A prospective randomized study of Lichtenstein open tension-free versus laparo-scopic totally extraperitoneal techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Acta Chir Bel, 2003, 103 (5): 502–6.
   Google Scholar
• Liem M. S., Van Duyn E. B., Van Der Graaf Y., Van Vroonhoven T. J., Coala Trial Group. Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg, 2003, 237 (1): 136–41.
   Google Scholar
• Stengel D., Bauwens K., Ekkernkamp A. Recurrence risks in randomized trials of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia: to pool or not to pool (this is not the question). Arch Surg, 2004, 389 (6): 492–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sub Wong Charoen S. Outcome of inguinal hernia repair total extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair versus open tension free repair (Lichtenstein technique). J Med Assoc Thai, 2002, 85 (10): 11004.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson D., Berndsen F. H., Larson L. G., Leijonmarck C. E., Rimbäck G., Rudberg C., Smedberg S., Spangen L., Montgomery A. Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg, 2005, 92 (9): 1085–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bowne W. B., Morgenthal C. B., Castro A. E., Shah P., Ferzli G. S. The role of endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: where do we stand in, 2005 ? Surg Endosc, 2007, 21 (5): 707–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kaafarani H. M., Itani K. M., Giobbie-Hurder A., Gleysteen J. J., McCarthy M., Gibbs J., Neumayer L. Does surgeon frustration and satisfaction with the operation predict outcomes of open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair ? J Am Coll Surg, 2005, 200 (5): 677–83.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon D., Decadt B., Rhodes M. Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17 (9): 1386–90.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer P. J. Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull, 2004, 70: 105–18.
   Google Scholar
• Leibl B. J., Daübler P., Schmedt C. G., Kraft K., Bittner R. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and Shouldice repair. Br J Surg, 2002, 87 (6): 780–783.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack K., Wake B., Perez J., Fraser C., Cook J., McIntosch E., Vale L., Grant A. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess, 2005, 9 (14): 1–203.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer L. A., Gawande A. A., Wang J., Giobbie-Hurder A., Itani K. M., Fitzgibbons R. J., Reda D., Jonasson O. Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg, 2005, 242 (3): 344–8.
   Google Scholar
• Colak T., Akea T., Kanik A., Aydin S. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach with open mesh repair in inguinal hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2003, 13 (3): 191–5.
   Google Scholar
• Winslow E. R., Quasebarth M., Brunt L. M. Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia in a mature surgical practice. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18 (2): 221–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lal P., Kajla R. K., Chander J., Saha R., Ramteke V. K. Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endose, 2003, 17 (6): 850–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhry E., Veen N., Langeveld H., Steyeberg E., Jeekel J., Bonjer H. Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair ? A systematic review. Surg Endose, 2007, 21 (2): 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C. J., Wilson T. Long term results of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioraphy. ANZ J Surg, 2005, 75 (8): 637–639.
   Google Scholar
• Saggar V. R., Sarangi R. Occult hernias and bilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: is there a need for prophylactic repair ? Hernia, 2007, 11: 47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Roseano M., Ressetta G., Pozzeto G., Babich F., De Manzini N. The treatment of inguinal hernia in the elderly: open technique or laparoscopic approach ? Acta Biomed, 2005, 76: 52–5.
   Google Scholar
• Glavan E., Mijic A., Bekavac-Beslin M., Franjic D. G., Jurislc D. Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair with Double Mesh: Indications, Technique, Complications and Results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2005, 15 (6): 586–590.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclooster P., Smet G., De Gheldere C., Segers K. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: review of 6 years experience. Acta Chir Belg, 2001, 101 (3): 135–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vatansev C., Belviranli M., Aksoy F., Tuncer S., Sahin M., Karahan O. The effects of different hernia repair methods on postoperative pain, medication and CRP levels. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002, 12 (4): 243–6.
   Google Scholar
• Suter M., Martinet O., Spertini F. Reduced acute phase response after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal bilateral hernia repair compared to open repair with the Stoppa procedure. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16 (8): 1214–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bozuk M., Schuster R., Stewart D., Hicks K., Greaney G., Waxman K. Disability and chronic pain after open mesh and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg, 2003, 69 (10): 83941.
   Google Scholar
• Bringman S., Ramel S., Heikkinen T. J., Englund T., Westman G., Anderberg G. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 2003, 237 (1): 142–7.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen T., Bringman S., Ohtonen P., Kunelius P., Haukipuro K., Hulkko A. Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18 (3): 518–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita F., Lahmann B., Otsuka K., Lyass S., Hiatt J. R., Phillips E. H. Quantification of pain and satisfaction following laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Arch Surg, 2004, 139 (6): 596–600.
   Google Scholar
• KÖNINGER J., Redecke J., Butters M. Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Arch Surg, 2004, 389 (5): 361–5.
   Google Scholar
• Thill V., Simoens Ch., Smets D., Ngongang Ch., Mendes Da Costa P. Long-term Results of a Non-Randomized Prospective Mono-Centre Study of 1000 Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repairs. Acta Chir Belg, 2008, 108: 405–408.
   Google Scholar
• European Hernia Society. Guidelines on Inguinal Hernia Treatment. European Working Group. Hernia, 2008, in press.
   Google Scholar