EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): Does it Fulfil all its Promises ?

References

• Ohki T., Veith F., Shaw P., Lipsitz E. et al. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a note of caution on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg, 2001, 234: 323–335.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford R. Randomised EVAR trials and advent of level I evidence: a paradigm shift in management of large abdominal aortic aneurysms. Sem Vasc Surg, 2006, 19: 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• The UK Small Aneurysm Trial (UKSAT) participants. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet, 1998, 353: 1649–1655.
   Google Scholar
• Lederle F., Johnson G., Wilson S. et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA, 2002, 287: 2968–2972.
   Google Scholar
• Fillinger M. Who should we operate on and how should we decide: predicting rupture and survivl in patients with aortic aneurysms. Sem Vasc Surg, 2007, 20: 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. Ann Surg, 1999, 230: 289–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford R. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: which risk factors play a role making in decision making ? Sem Vasc Surg, 2008, 21: 124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Scott A., Tisi P., Ashton H., Allen D. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture rates: a 7-year fillow-up of the entire abdominal aneurysm population detected by screening. J Vasc Surg, 1998, 28: 124–128.
   Google Scholar
• Verloes A., Sakalihasan N., Koulisher L., Limet R. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: familial and genetic aspects in 33 pedigrees. J Vasc Surg, 1995, 21: 646–655.
   Google Scholar
• Limet R., Sakalihasan N., Albert A. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of the rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 1991, 14: 540–548.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzer N., Mascha E., Karafa M., O’Hara P. et al. Open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1998. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35: 1145–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin A., Bergqvist D., Holinberg L. Literature review of surgical management of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2001, 22: 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR-1 trial), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004, 364: 843–848.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Buskens E., Buth J et al. for the DREAM trial group. A randomised trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351: 1607–1618.
   Google Scholar
• Lovergrove R., Javid M., Magee T., Galland R. A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair ob abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 2008, 95: 677–684.
   Google Scholar
• Faizer R., De Rose G., Lawlor D., Harris K., Forbes T. Objective scoring systems of medical risk: a clinical tool for selecting patients for open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 45: 1102–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Samy A., Murray G., Mac Bain G. Glasgow Aneurysm Score. Cardiovasc Surg, 1994, 2: 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Biancari F., Hobo R., Juvonen T. Glasgow Aneurysm Score predicts survival after endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients from the Eurostar registry. Br J Surg, 2006, 93: 191–194.
   Google Scholar
• Biancari F., Heikkinen M., Lepantalo M., Salenius JP. and the Finnvasc Study Group. Glasgow Aneurysm score in patients undergoing elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Finnvasc study. Eur J Vasc Surg, 2003, 26: 612–617.
   Google Scholar
• EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial-2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365: 2187–2192.
   Google Scholar
• Sicard G., Zwolak R., Sidawy A., White R., Siami F. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: long-term outcome measures in patients at high risk for open surgery. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlgren C., Malmstedt J. Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compaired with open surgical repair in high-risk patients: results from the Swedish Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48: 1382–1388.
   Google Scholar
• Bush R., Johnson M., Dedayati N., Henderson W., Lin P., Lumdsen A. Performance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients: results from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 45: 227–234.
   Google Scholar
• EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR-1 trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365: 2179–2186.
   Google Scholar
• Blankensteijn J., de Jong S., Prinssen M. et al. (DREAM trial study group). Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovas-cular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352: 2398–2405.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford R., Bown M., Sayers R., Fishwick G., London N. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 5-year follow-up results. Ann Vasc Surg, 2008, 22: 372–378.
   Google Scholar
• Abu Rahma A., Welch C., Mullins B., Dyer B. Computed tomography versus color duplex ultrasound surveillance of abdominal aortic stentgrafts. J Endovasc Ther, 2005, 12: 568–573.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Busken E., Nolthenius R., Van Sterkenburg S., Teijink J., Blankensteijn J. Sexual dysfunction after conventional and endovascular A.A. repair. Results of the DREAM trial. J Endovasc Ther, 2004, 11: 613–620.
   Google Scholar
• Winterborn R., Amin I., Lyratropoulos G. et al. Preferences for endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical repair among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm under surveillance. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49: 576–581.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Buskens E., de Jong S. et al. for the DREAM trial participants. Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneu-rysms: results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46: 883–890.
   Google Scholar
• Blankensteijn J. Communication at the International Symposium on Aneurysms, Liège (Belgium); 08–09 Septembre, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Torella F. (on behalf of the Eurostar collaborators). Effect of improved endograft design on outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 40: 216–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hobo R., Buth J. (on behalf of Eurostar Collaborators). Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts. A Eurostar report. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 43: 896–902.
   Google Scholar
• Drury D., Michaels J., Jones L. et al. A Systematic review of recent evidence for the safety and efficacy of elective endovascu-lar repair in the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg, 2005, 92: 937–946.
   Google Scholar
• Harris P., Vallabhaneni S., Degranges P. et al. (on behalf of Eurostar collaborators). Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the Eurostar experience. J Vasc Surg, 2000, 32: 739–749.
   Google Scholar
• Van Marrewyk C., Buth J., Harris P., Norgren L., Nevelsteen A., Wyatt M. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the Eurostar experience. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35: 461–473.
   Google Scholar
• Vallabhaneni S., Harris P. Lessons learnt from the Eurostar registry on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Radiol, 2001, 39: 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lifeline Registry of endovascular aneurysm repair: long-term primary outcome measures. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 42: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rockman C., Lamparello M., Adelman M. et al. Aneurysm morphology and risk of endoleakage: do small aneurysm behave better after EVAR ? Ann Vasc Surg, 2002, 16: 644–651.
   Google Scholar
• Franks S., Sutton A., Bown M., Sayers R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 years of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007, 33: 154–171.
   Google Scholar
• Armon M., Yusuf S., Whitaker S. et al. Influence of abdominal aortic aneurysm size on the feasibility of endovascular repair. J Endovasc Surg, 1997, 4: 279–283.
   Google Scholar
• Ouriel K., Srivastava S., Sarac T. et al. Disparate outcome after endovascular treatment of small versus large abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2003, 37: 1206–1212.
   Google Scholar
• Peppenlenbosch M., Buth J., Harris P., van Marrewijk C., Fransen G (for Eurostar collaborators). Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: does size matter ? A report from Eurostar. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39: 288–297.
   Google Scholar
• De Rango p., Cao P., Parlani G., Verzini F., Brambilla D. Outcome after endografting in small and large aortic aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 35: 162–172.
   Google Scholar
• Zarins C., Crabtree T., Bloch D., Arko F., Ouriel K., White R. Endovascular repair at 5 years: does aneurysm diameter predict outcome ? J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 920–930.
   Google Scholar
• Zarins C., Crabtree T., Arko F., Heikkinen M., Bloch D., Ouriel K., White R. Endovascular repair or surveillance of patients with small AAA ? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2005, 29: 496–503.
   Google Scholar
• Ouriel K. Treating smaller AAA’s. Does the availability of endovascular grafts change the size treshold of repair ? www.evtoday.com, 2005, 3: 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cao P. CAESAR trial collaborators. Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneursysm repair (CAESAR trial): study design and progress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc, 2005, 30: 245–251.
   Google Scholar
• Lall O., Gloviczki P., Agarwall G., Duncan A. et al. Comparison of EVAR and open repair in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms: can we predict results of the PIVOTAL trial ? J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49: 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso R., Butler B., Greenberg R., Eagleton M., Clair D. Late conversion of aortic stentgrafts. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49: 589–595.
   Google Scholar
• EVAR trial participants. Secondary interventions and mortality following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: device specific results from the UK EVAR trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007, 34: 281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster D ., Jones J ., Chung T. et al. Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade. Ann Surg, 2006, 244: 426–438.
   Google Scholar
• Makaroun M., Chaikof E., Haslund T. Efficacy of bifurcated endograft versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35: 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser F., Gusberg R., Dardik A., Lin P., Verhagen H., Moll F., Muhs B. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted ? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2009, 37: 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen G., Vallabhaneni S., Van Marrewijk C., Laheij R., Harris P., Buth J. (on behalf of Eurostar collaborators). Rupture of infrarenal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: a series from Eurostar registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2003, 26: 487–493.
   Google Scholar
• Adam D., Fitridje R., Raptis S. Late reintervention for aortic graft-related events and new aortoiliac disease after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in an Australian population. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 43: 701–705.
   Google Scholar
• Hallet J., Marshall D., Petterson T. et al. Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year population based experience. J Vasc Surg, 1997, 25: 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster D., Cronenwett J., Hallet J., Johnston W., Matsumura J. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the JointCouncil of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg, 2003, 1106–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn M., Finlaysen S., Fillinger M., Buth J., Van Marrewijk C., Cronenwett J. Life expectancy after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Results of a decision analysis model on the basis of data from Eurostar. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36: 1112–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf Y., Fogarty T., Olcott C. et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneu-rysms: eligibility rate and impact on the rate of open repair. J Vasc Surg, 2000, 32: 519–523.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Aroms R., Moscowitz A. et al. A state-wide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: rapid diffusion with excellent early results. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39: 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher H., Eckstein H., Kallinowski F., Allengerg J. Morphometry and classification in abdominal aortic aneurysms: patient selection for endovascular and open surgery. J Endovasc Surg, 1997, 4: 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Eliason J., Upchurch G. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation, 2008, 117: 1738–1744.
   Google Scholar