Do we need a new carotid artery stenting trial ?

References

• Moore W. The Carotid Revascularisation by Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): outcome results. Communication at International Stroke Conference of the American Heart Association. San Antonio, February 26, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett H., Taylor D., Eliasziw M. et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339: 1415–1425.
   Google Scholar
• European Carotid Surgery Trialists’Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998, 351: 1379–1387.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberg M., Wilson S., Yatsu F. VA symptomatic carotid stenosis group. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. JAMA, 1991, 266: 3289–3294.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M., Eliasziw M., Gutnikov S. A., FoxA. J., Taylor D. W., Mayberg M. R., Warlow C. P., Barnett H. Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 2003, 361: 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M., Eliaszim M., Gutnikov S. A., Warlow C. P., Barnett H. J. Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet, 2004, 363 (9413): 915–924.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor A. R. Occam’s razor. Intervene early to prevent more strokes. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48 :1053–1059.
   Google Scholar
• ACAS-trial. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA, 1995, 273 :1421–1428.
   Google Scholar
• Stoner M., de Freitas D. Process of care for carotid endarterectomy: perioperative medical management. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 52: 223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Bangalore S, Wetterslev J, Pranesh S, Sawhney S. et al. Perioperative beta-blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet, 2008, 372: 1962–1976.
   Google Scholar
• Poldermans D., Boersma E., Bax J., Thomson I., Vandeven L., Blankensteijn J. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. N Engl J Med, 1999, 341: 1789–1794.
   Google Scholar
• Ostergren J., Sleight P., Dagenais G., Danisa K., Bosch J. et al. Impact of ramipril in patients with evidence of clinical or subclinical peripheral arterial disease. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25 :17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2002, 36: 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil-Callahan K., Katsimaglis G., Tepper M. et al. Statins decrease perioperative cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery: the Statins Risk Reduction in Surgery (StaRRS) study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 45: 336–342.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel M., Verhaegen R. American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Anti-thrombotic therapy for peripheral artery occlusive disease. Chest 2008, 133 (6 Suppl): 815S-843S.
   Google Scholar
• Amarenco P., Labreuche J. Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8 :453–463.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott A. L. Medical (non-surgical) intervention alone is now the best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke, 2009, 40: e573–e583.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Kinsey J. Symptomatic carotid stenosis: endarterectomy, stenting or best medical management ? Semin Vasc Surg, 2008, 21: 108–114.
   Google Scholar
• Theron J., Raymond J., Carasco A., Coutheaoux F. Percutaneous angioplasty of atherosclerotic and post-surgical stenosis of carotid arteries. Am J Neuroradiol, 1987, 8: 495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J. L., Chatellier G., Blyssen B. et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. NEngl J Med, 2006, 355: 60–1671.
   Google Scholar
• Ringleb P., Allenberg J., Bruskmann H. et al. 30-day results from the SPACE trial (Stent Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy) in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2006, 368: 1239–1247.
   Google Scholar
• international Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2010, 375: 985–997.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R. W. Update on the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST)protocol. J Am Coll Surg, 2002, 194 (1 suppl): S 9-S 14.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes Th. Preliminary results of Carotid Revascularisation Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST). J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51: 1300–1301.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J. L., Trinquart L., Leys D. et al (EVA-3S Investigators). Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic >severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicenter trial. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 885–92.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein H. H., Ringleb P., Allenberg J. R., Berger J., Fraedrich G., Hacke W., Hennerici M., Stingele R., Fiehler J., Zeumer H., Jansen O. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 893–902.
   Google Scholar
• Stingele R., Berger J., Alfke K. et al. Clinical and angiographic risk factors for stroke and death within 30 days after carotid endarterectomy and stent-protected angioplasty: a sub analysis of the SPACE study. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 216–222.
   Google Scholar
• Ederle J., Featherstone R., Brown M. Randomized controlled trials comparing endarterectomy and endovascular treatment for carotid artery stenosis: a Cochrane systematic review (Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4) CD 000515,2007). Stroke, 2009, 40: 13731380.
   Google Scholar
• Pendelbury S., Rothwell. Prevalence, incidence and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8: 1006–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Bonati L. H., Jongen L. M., Hallet S. et al. for the ICSS-MRI study group. New ischemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or carotid endarterectomy: a substudy of the international Carotid Stenting Study. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9 (4): 345.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R., Ferguson R. status Report on the Carotid Revascularisation Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST). Techn Vasc Interv Radiol, 2000, 3: 99–101.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor R. Riding on the CREST of a wave ! Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2010, 39: 523–526.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin R. Study finds stents effective in preventing strokes. http//www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/health/27stroke.
   Google Scholar
• Gray W., Yadav J., Scicli A. et al. The CAPTURE registry: results of caroid stenting with embolic protection in the post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007, 70: 1025–1033.
   Google Scholar
• Giles M. F., Rothwell P. M. Risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6: 1063–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Cremonesi A., Gieowarsingh S., Spagnolo B. et al. Safety, efficacy and long-term durability of endovascular therapy for carotid artery disease: the tailored Carotid Artery Stenting Experience of a single high-volume center (tailored-CASE Registry). Euro-intervention, 2009, 5: 589–598.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor A. R. What is the current status of angioplasty vs endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease ? J Cardiovasc Surg, 2007, 48: 161–180.
   Google Scholar
• White R., Sicard G., Zwolak R. et al (SVS outcomes committee). Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry. Comparison of carotid artery stenting outcomes for atherosclerotic versus non-atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51: 11161123.
   Google Scholar
• Coscas R., Rhissassi B., Gruet-Coquet M., Couture Th., de Tymowski Ch., Chiche L., Kieffet E. Open surgery remains a valid option for the treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51: 1124–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Eskandari M., Usman A., Garcia-Toca M., Matsumura J., Kibbe M., Morasch M., Rodriguez H., Pearce W. Eight-year institutional review of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51: 11451151.
   Google Scholar
• Naylot R. Stenting versus endarterectomy: the debate continues. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 862–864.
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway A., Zwolak R., White R. et al. Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from SVS Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49: 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• De Borst G., Ackerstaff R., de Vries J., van de Pavoordt E., Vos J., Overtoom T., Moll F. Carotid angioplasty and stenting for post-endarterectomy stenosis: long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 198: 356–359.
   Google Scholar
• Ederle J., Bonati L., Dobson J. (CAVATAS Investigators). Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid And Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet, 2009, 8: 898–907.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. Poor outcomes after endovascular treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: time for a moratorium. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8: 871–872.
   Google Scholar
• Bonati L., Mc Cabe D., Dobson J. et al. Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplaasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8: 908–917.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbauer M., Pfister K., Greindl M. et al. Alert for increased long-term follow-up after carotid artery stenting: results of a prospective randomized single-center trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48: 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cao P., De Rango P., Zannetti S. Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2002, 23: 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• McPhee J., Schanzer A., Messina L., Eslami M. Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of post procedure stroke, death and resource utilisation than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48 :1442–1450.
   Google Scholar
• Gurm H., Yadav J., Fayad P. et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358: 1572–1579.
   Google Scholar
• Gray W., Hopkins N., Yadav S. et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients. The ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 258–269.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco R., Adams R., Alters G. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for health care professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association-Council on Stroke. Stroke, 2006, 37: 577–617.
   Google Scholar
• Biller J., Feinberg W., Castaldo J., Whittemore A., Harbaugh R., Dempsey R. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council. American Heart Association. Stroke, 1998, 29: 554–562.
   Google Scholar
• Gray W., Charturvedi S., Verta P. 30-day outcome for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from two prospective multi-center high surgical risk registries. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, 2009, 2: 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• IlligK., Zhang R., Tanski W., Benesch C., SternbachY., Green R. Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified ? J Vasc Surg, 2003, 37: 575–581.
   Google Scholar
• Veith F. J., Amor M., Ohki T., Beebe H. G., Bell P. R., Bolia A., Bergeron P., Connors J. J. 3rd, Dietrich E. B., Ferguson R. D., Henry M., Hobson R. W. 2nd, Hopkins L. N., Katzen B. T., Matthias K., Roubin G. S., Theron J., Wholey M. H., Yadav S. S. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33 (2 Suppl): S111–S116.
   Google Scholar
• Frego M., Bridda A., Ruffolo C., Scarpa M., Polese L., Bianchera G. The hostile neck does not increase the risk of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 50: 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gossetti B., Gattuso R., Irace L. et al. Embolism to the brain during carotid stenting and surgery. Acta Chir Belg, 2007, 107: 151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Faggioli G., Ferri M., Serra C., Biagini E., Manzoli L., Lodi R., Rapezzi C., Stella A. The residual risk of cerebral embolism after carotid stenting: the complex interplay between stent coverage and aortic arch atherosclerosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2009, 37: 519–524.
   Google Scholar
• Faggioli G., Ferri M., Rapezzi Cl., Tonon C., Manzoli L., Stella A. Atherosclerotic aortic lesions increase the risk of cerebral embolisms during carotid stenting in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49: 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer F., Lacroix V., Duprez T., Grandin C., Verhelst R., Peeters A. et al. Cerebral microembolization after protected carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients: results of a 2-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 42: 847–853.
   Google Scholar
• Maleux G., Demaerel P., Verbeken E., Daenens K., Heye S., Van Sonhoven F., Nevelsteen A., Wilms G. Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27: 1830–1833.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J. L., Chatellier G., Beyssen B. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke, 2004, 35: 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Garg N., Karagiorgos N., Pisimis G. et al. Cerebral protection devices reduce per procedural strokes during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a systematic review of the current literature. J Endovasc Ther, 2009, 16: 412–427.
   Google Scholar
• Barbato J., Dillavou E., Horowitz M. et al. A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 47: 760–765.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald S., Evans D., Griffiths P., Mc Kevitt F., Venables G., Cleveland T. Filter-protected versus unprotected carotid artery stenting: a randomised trial. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2010, 29: 282–289.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen O., Fielher J., Hartman M. et al. Protection or non-protection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional technique on outcome data from the SPACE trial. Stroke, 2009, 40: 41–846.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., Diederich K. W., Sceinert S. et al. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolisation during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44: 19661969.
   Google Scholar
• El Koussy M., Schrot G., Do D. et al. Periprocedural embolic events related to carotid artery stenting detected by diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison between proximal and distal embolic protection devices. J Endovsc Ther, 2007, 14: 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Leal J., Ozgaz A., Fontcuberta J., Flores A., Doblas M., GarciaBenassi J., Lane B., Loh C., Criado E. A prospective evaluation of cerebral infarction following transcervical carotid stenting with carotid flow reversal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2010, 39: 661–666.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer V., de Donato G., Deloose K. et al. The type of embolic protection does not influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46: 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaudigel S., Gröschel K., Pilgram S., Kastrup A. New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. A systematic review of the literature. Stroke, 2008, 39: 1911–1919.
   Google Scholar
• Schillinger M., Gschwendtner M., Reimers B. et al. Does carotid stent cell design matter ? Stroke, 2008, 39: 905–909.
   Google Scholar
• Biasi G., Froio A., Dietrich E. et al. Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting. The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation, 2004, 110: 756–762.
   Google Scholar
• Coppi G., Morato R., Veronesi J., Nicolosi E., Silingardi R. Carotid artery stent fracture identification and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51: 1397–1405.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel T., Dombrovskiy V., Haser P., Schreier J., Graham A. Outcomes of carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the United States. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49: 325–330.
   Google Scholar
• Park B., Mavanur A., Dahn M., Menzoian J. Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of carotid artery angioplasty with stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44: 270–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ederle J., Featherstone R., Brown M. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid stenosis. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, CD000515) Stroke, 2009, 40: 1373–1380.
   Google Scholar
• Liapis C., Bell P., Mikhailidis D.., Sivenius .J, Nicolaides A., Fernandes J. et al. on behalf of the Guidelines Collaborators. ESVS guidelines: invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2009, 37 (4 suppl): S1–S19.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R., Mackey W., Ascher M., Murad M., Calligaro K., Comerota A. et al. Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48: 480–486.
   Google Scholar
• Katzen B. TACIT: TransAtlantic Asymptomatic Carotid Intervention Trial. Endovascular Today, Sept 2005: 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Reiff T., Stingele R., Eckstein H. et al. Stent-protected angioplas-ty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis versus endarterectomy: SPACE-2, a three-arm randomised-controlled clinical trial. Int J Stroke, 2009, 4: 294–299.
   Google Scholar
• Rudarakanchana N., Dyalynas M., Halliday A. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): rational for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2009, 39: 239–242.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura J., Rosenfield K. The asymptomatic Carotid Trial-1. Stroke Trials Registry, Clinical Trials.gov NCT 00106938.
   Google Scholar