Morbidity after Closure of a Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy

References

• Weston-Petrides G. K., Lovegrove K. E., Tilney H. S. et al. Comparison of outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Arch Surg, 2008, 143: 406–412.
   Google Scholar
• Hüser N., Michalski C. W., Erkan M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg, 2008, 248: 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen P, Hallböök O., RutegArd J., Simert G., Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. A randomised multi-centre trial. Ann Surg, 2007, 246: 207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Pata G., D’Hoore A., Fieuws S., Penninckx F. Mortality risk analysis following routine vs selective defunctioning stoma formation after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11: 797–805.
   Google Scholar
• den Dulk M., Smit M., Peeters K. et al. A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8: 297–303.
   Google Scholar
• Chow A., Tilney H. S., ParaskevaP., Jeyarajah S., Zacharakis E., Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunction-ing ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009, 24: 711–723.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield S., Jensen C., Phair A., Kelly O., Kelly S. Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg, 2008, 32: 2101–2106.
   Google Scholar
• Flikier-Zelkowicz A., Codina-Cazador A., Farrés-Coll R., Olivet-Pujol F., Martín-Grillo A., Pujadas-de Palol M. Morbidity and mortality associated with diverting ileostomy closure in rectal cancer surgery. Cir Esp, 2008, 84: 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gastinger I., Marusch F., Steinert R. et al. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg, 2005, 92: 1137–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Law W. L., Chu K. W., Choi H. K. Randomised clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg, 2002, 89: 704–708.
   Google Scholar
• Rullier E., Le Toux N., Laurent C., Garrelon J. L., Parneix M., Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg, 2001, 25: 274–277.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D. P., Leppington-Clarke A., Sexton R., Heald R. J., Moran B. J. Stoma related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Br J Surg, 2001, 88: 360–363.
   Google Scholar
• Amin S. N., Memon M. A., Armitage N. C., Scholefield J. H. Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2001, 83: 246–249.
   Google Scholar
• Wong K. S., Remzi F. H., Gorgun E. et al. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48: 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• García-Botello S. A., García-Armengol J., García-Granero E. et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg, 2004, 21: 440–446.
   Google Scholar
• Perez R., Habr-Gama A., Seid V. et al. Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 49: 1539–1545.
   Google Scholar
• Bakx R., Busch O. R. C., Bemelman W. A., Veldink G. J., Slors J. F. M., van Lanschot J. J. B. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg, 2004, 21: 277–281.
   Google Scholar
• Leung T. T., MacLean A. R., Buie W. D., Dixon E. Comparison of stapled versus hand-sewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008, 12: 939–944.
   Google Scholar
• Chude G. G., Rayate N. V., Patris V. et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure ? A prospective randomised study. Hepatogastroenterology, 2008, 55: 15621567.
   Google Scholar
• Schröck T. R., Deveney C. W., Dunphy J. E. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg, 1973, 177: 513–518.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen P., Hallböök O., Andersson M., Rutegard J., Sjödahl R. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis, 2004, 6: 462–469.
   Google Scholar
• Jestin P., PAhlman L., Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis, 2008, 23: 703–707.
   Google Scholar
• Alves A., Panis Y., Trancart D., Regimbeau J. M., Pocard M., Valleur P. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: a multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg, 2002, 26: 499–502.
   Google Scholar
• Rullier E., Laurent C., Garrelon L., Michel P., Saric J., Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 1998, 85: 355–358.
   Google Scholar
• Talheimer A., Bueter M., Kortuem M., Thiede A. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 49: 1011–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen P., Hallböök O., RutegArd J., Sjödahl R. Intraoperative adverse events and outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg, 2004, 91: 1608–1612.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer R., Becker H., Hohenberger P. et al. Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy as compared with postoperative chemoradio-therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351: 11–20.
   Google Scholar