“Diagnostic Value of MRCP in Biliary Pancreatitis: Result of Long-Term Follow-up”

References

• Romagnuolo J., Currie G. Calgary Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy Center Study Group: Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005, 61: 86–87.
   Google Scholar
• Tonsi A. F., Bacchion M., Crippa S., Malleo G., Bassi C. Acute pancreatitis at the beginning of the 21st century: the state of the art. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, 15: 2945–2959.
   Google Scholar
• Neoptolemos J. P., Carr-Locke D. I., London N., Bailey I. A., James D., Fossard D. P. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphinctero-tomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet, 1988, 2: 979–983.
   Google Scholar
• Fan S. T., Lai E. C., Mok F. P, Lo C. M., Zheng S. S., Wong J. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillo-tomy. N Engl J Med, 1993, 328: 228–232.
   Google Scholar
• Folsch U. R., Nitsche R., Ludtke R., Hilgers R. A., Creutzfeldt W. Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. The German Study Group on Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med, 1997, 336: 237–242.
   Google Scholar
• Colton J. B., Curran C. C. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 70: 457–467.
   Google Scholar
• Baron T. H., Petersen B. T., Mergener K. et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc, 2006, 63: 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dumot J. A. ERCP: current uses and less-invasive options. Cleve Clin J Med, 2006, 73: 418, 421, 424–425 passim. Review.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov M. S., Savides T. J. Systematic review of endoscopic ultra-sonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogra-phy for suspected choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg, 2009, 96: 967974. Review.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin N., Wastle M. L., Dunn W. K., Ryder S. D., Beckingham I. J. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003, 15: 809–813.
   Google Scholar
• Shanmugan V., Beattie GC., Yule SR., Reid W., Loudon MA. Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging ? Br J Radiol, 2005, 78: 888–893.
   Google Scholar
• Sica G. T., Braver J., Cooney M. J., Miller F. H., Chai J. L., Adams DF. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology, 1999, 210: 605–610.
   Google Scholar
• Makary M. A., Duncan M. D., Harmon J. W., Freeswick P. D., Bender J. S., Bohlman M. et al. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis. Ann Surg, 2005, 241: 119–124.
   Google Scholar
• Mofidi R., Lee A. C., Madhavan K. K., Garden O. J., Parks R. W. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 2008, 8: 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Opie E. L. The etiology of acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp, 1901, 12: 182–192.
   Google Scholar
• Lerch M. M., Saluja A. K., Runzi M., Dawra R., Saluja M., Steer M. L. Pancreatic duct obstruction triggers acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the opossum. Gastroenterology, 1993, 104: 853–861.
   Google Scholar
• Rickes S., Treiber G., Mönkemüller K. et al. Impact of the operator’s experience on value of high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparison using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the gold Standard. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2006, 41: 838–843.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen A. J., Asthana S., Al-MukhtarA., Attia M., Toogood G. J. Preoperative determinants of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Clin Pract, 2008, 62: 17151719.
   Google Scholar
• Katz D., Nikfarjam M., Sfakiotaki A., Christophi C. Selective endoscopic cholangiography for the detection of common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis. Endoscopy, 2004, 36: 10451049.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor T. V., Armstrong e. P. Migration of gall stones. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1987, 294: 1320–1322.
   Google Scholar
• Frossard J. I., Hadengue A., Amouyal G. et al. Choledo-cholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000, 51: 175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Collins C., Maguire D., Ireland A., Fitzgerald E., O’Sullivan G. C. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg, 2004, 239: 2833.
   Google Scholar
• Chang I., Lo S., Stabile B. E., Lewis R. J., Toosie K., de Virgilio C. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg, 2000, 231: 82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarstrom L. E., Andersson R., Stridbeck H., Ihse I. Influence of bile duct stones on patient features and effect of endo-scopic sphincterotomy on early outcome of edematous gallstone pancreatitis. World J Surg, 1999, 23: 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman M. L., Nelson D. B., Sherman S., Haber G. B., Herman M. E., Dorsher P. J. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335: 909–918.
   Google Scholar
• Barthet M., Lesavre N., Desjeux A. et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy, 2002, 34: 991–997.
   Google Scholar
• Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G. et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc, 1998, 48: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama M., Atomi Y. Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients. Br J Surg, 1998, 85: 917–921.
   Google Scholar
• Becker C. D., Grossholz M., Mentha G., de Peyer R., Terrier F. MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, postoperative, and malignant conditions. Eur Radiol, 1997, 7: 865–874.
   Google Scholar
• Mark D. H., Flamm C. R., Aronson N. Evidence-based assessment of diagnostic modalities for common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002, 56: 190–194.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher A. S. MRCP and ERCP in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002, 56: 178–182.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher A. S., Turner M. A., Capps G. W., Zfass A. M., Baker K. M. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology, 1998, 207: 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Aubé C., Delorme B., Yzet T. et al. MR cholangiopancreatogra-phy versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184: 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Jendresen M. B., Thorboll J. E., Adamsen S., Nielsen H., Gronvall S., Hart-Hansen O. Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic chole-cystectomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg, 2002, 168: 690–694.
   Google Scholar
• Dwerryhouse S. J., Brown E., Vipond M. N. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg, 1998, 85: 1364–1366.
   Google Scholar
• Demartines N., Eisner L., Schnabel K., Fried R., Zuber M., Harder F. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg, 2000, 135: 148–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hallal A. H., Amortegui J. D., Jeroukhimov I. M. et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg, 2005, 200: 869–875.
   Google Scholar
• Becker C. D., Grossholz M., Becker M., Mentha G., de Peyer R., Terrier F. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology, 1997, 205: 523–530.
   Google Scholar
• Kahaleh M., Hall J. D., Kohli A. et al. Cholecystectomy Protect from Recurrent Gallstone Pancreatitis After Biliary Sphincterotomy ? A Prospective Study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2007, 65: AB223.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarström L. E., Stridbeck H., Ihse I. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy on late outcome after gallstone pancreatitis. Br J Surg, 1998, 85: 333–336.
   Google Scholar
• van Geenen E. J., van der Peet D. L., Mulder C. J., Cuesta M. A., Bruno M. J. Recurrentnacute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23: 950–956. Review.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell R. J., Noonan N., Mahmud N., Morrin M. M., Kelleher D., Keeling P. W. Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain. Endoscopy, 2001, 33: 668–675.
   Google Scholar