11
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Papers

Recurrent Symptoms after Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy and the Impact on Patient Satisfaction after a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-up

, , , &
Pages 419-422 | Published online: 11 Mar 2016

References

  • Ferguson J. A., Heaton J. R. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 1959, 2: 176–179.
  • Milligan E. T. Hemorrhoidectomy. Proc R Soc Med, 1959, 52(Suppl): 87–88.
  • Morgan C. N. Hemorrhoids and their surgical treatment, a description of the St. Mark’s Hospital operation for hemorrhoids. Surg Clin North Am, 1955: 1457–1464.
  • Chung C. C., Ha J. P., Tai Y. P., Tsang W. W., Li M. K. Doubleblind, randomized trial comparing Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: ligation technique. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45: 789794.
  • Guenin M. O., Rosenthal R., Kern B., Peterli R., von Flue M., Ackermann C. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48: 1523–1527.
  • Johannsson H. O., Pahlman L., Graf W. Randomized clinical trial of the effects on anal function of Milligan-Morgan versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2006, 93: 1208–1214.
  • Kwok S. Y., Chung C. C., Tsui K. K., Li M. K. A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hem-orrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48: 344–348.
  • Picchio M., Palimento D., Attanasio υ., Renda A. Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2006, 21: 668–669.
  • Quah H. M., Seow-Choen F. Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy excision and diathermy coagulation for symptomatic, prolapsed hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47: 367370.
  • Milito G., Cadeddu F., Muzi M. G., Nigro C., Farinon A. M. Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis, 2010, 12: 85–93.
  • Shanmugam V., Thaha M. A., Rabindranath K. S., Campbell K. L., Steele R. J., Loudon M. A. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2005, 92: 1481–1487.
  • Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Montori A. (ed.). 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Rome: Monduzzi editore, 1998: 777–784.
  • Corman M. L., Gravie J. F., Hager T. et al. Stapled haemor-rhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party - indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis, 2003, 5: 304–310.
  • Burch J., Epstein D., Sari A. B. et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11: 233–243.
  • Giordano P., Gravante G., Sorge R., Ovens L., Nastro P. Longterm outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg, 2009, 144: 266–272.
  • Laughlan K., Jayne D. G., Jackson D., Rupprecht F., Ribaric G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009, 24: 335–344.
  • Nisar P. J., Acheson A. G., Neal K. R., Scholefield J. H. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidecto-my: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47: 1837–1845.
  • Lan P., Wu X., Zhou X., Wang J., Zhang L. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2006, 21: 172–178.
  • Shao W. J., Li G. C., Zhang Z. H., Yang B. L., Sun G. D., Chen Y. Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2008, 95: 147–160.
  • Au-Yong I., Rowsell M., Hemingway D. M. Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy, a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis, 2004, 6: 37–38.
  • Ganio E., Altomare DF., Gabrielli F., Milito G., Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2001, 88: 669–674.
  • Jayaraman S., Colquhoun P. H., Malthaner R. A. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006: CD005393.
  • Kairaluoma M., Nuorva K., Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46: 93–99.
  • Smyth E. F., Baker R. P., Wilken B. J., Hartley J. E., White T. J., Monson J. R. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: longterm follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2003, 361: 1437–1438.
  • Van de Stadt J., D’Hoore A., Duinslaeger M., Chasse E., Penninckx F. Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids, a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg, 2005, 105: 44–52.
  • Tjandra J. J., Chan M. K. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50: 878–892.
  • Cheetham M. J., Cohen C. R., Kamm M. A., Phillips R. K. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46: 491–497.
  • Correa-Rovelo J. M., Tellez O., Obregon L., Miranda-Gomez A., Moran S. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45: 1367–1374.
  • Singer M. A., Cintron J. R., Fleshman J. W. et al. Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45: 360–367.
  • Fueglistaler P., Guenin M. O., Montali I. et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50: 204–212.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.