Mitral Regurgitation and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Comparison of Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement

References

• Vassileva C. M., Boley T., Markwell S., Hazelrigg S. Metaanalysis of short-term and long-term survival following repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2011, 39: 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Bursi F., Enriquez-Sarano M., Nkomo V. T. et al. Heart failure and death after myocardial infarction in the community: the emerging role of mitral regurgitation. Circulation, 2005, 111: 295–301.
   Google Scholar
• Glower D. D., Tuttle RH., Shaw L. K., Orozco R. E., Rankin J. S. Patient survival characteristics after routine mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 129: 860–868.
   Google Scholar
• Trichon B. H., Felker G. M., Shaw L. K., Cabell C. H., O’Connor C. M. Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Am J Cardiol, 2003, 91: 538543.
   Google Scholar
• Grigioni F., Detaint D., Avierinos J. F., Scott C., Tajik J., Enriquez-Sarano M. Contribution of ischemic mitral regurgitation to congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 45: 260–267.
   Google Scholar
• Fedak P. W., McCarthy P. M., Bonow R. O. Evolving concepts and technologies in mitral valve repair. Circulation, 2008, 117: 963–974.
   Google Scholar
• Bonow R. O., Carabello B. A., Chatterjee K. et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation, 2008, 118: e523–e661.
   Google Scholar
• Bouma W., van der Horst I. C., Wddh-den Hamer I. J. et al. Chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Current treatment results and new mechanism-based surgical approaches. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010, 37: 170–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwahara E., Otsuji Y., Iguro Y. et al. Mechanism of recurrent/persistent ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation in the chronic phase after surgical annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior leaflet tethering. Circulation, 2006, 114: i529–i534.
   Google Scholar
• Filsoufi F., Rahmanian PB., Castillo JG., Bronster D., Adams DH. incidence, imaging analysis, and early and late outcomes of stroke after cardiac valve operation. Am J Cardiol, 2008, 101: 1472–8.
   Google Scholar
• Newman M. F., Mathew J. P, Grocott H. P. et al. Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery. Lancet, 2006, 368: 694–703.
   Google Scholar
• Kallikazaros I., Tsioufis C., Sideris S., Stefanadis C., Toutouzas P. Carotid artery disease as a marker for the presence of severe coronary artery disease in patients evaluated for chest pain. Stroke, 1999, 30: 1002–1007.
   Google Scholar
• SchachnerT., ZimmerA., Nagele G., Laufer G., BonattiJ. Risk factors for late stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 130: 485–490.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay K. H., Schinderle D. B., Swaminathan M. et al. Predictors of inotrope use during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2004, 18: 404–408.
   Google Scholar
• Maganti M., Badiwala M., Sheikh A. et al. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after isolated mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 140: 790–796.
   Google Scholar
• Yau T. M., Fedak P. W., Weisel R. D., Teng C., Ivanov J. Predictors of operative risk for coronary bypass operations in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999, 118: 1006–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Thourani V. H., Weintraub W. S., Guyton R. A. et al. Outcomes and long-term survival for patients undergoing mitral valve repair versus replacement: effect of age and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation, 2003, 108: 298–304.
   Google Scholar
• Ettema R. G., Peelen L. M., Schuurmans M. J., Nierich A. P., Kalkman C. J., Moons K. G. Prediction models for prolonged intensive care unit stay after cardiac surgery: systematic review and validation study. Circulation, 2010, 122: 682–689.
   Google Scholar
• Magne J., Girerd N., Sénéchal M. et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison of shortterm and long-term survival. Circulation, 2009, 120: S104–S111.
   Google Scholar
• Milano C. A., Daneshmand M. A., Rankin J. S. et al. Survival prognosis and surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 86: 735–744.
   Google Scholar
• Gillinov A. M., Wierup P. N., Blackstone E. H. et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation ? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2001, 122: 1125–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Gillinov A. M. Is ischemic mitral regurgitation an indication for surgical repair or replacement ? Heart Fail Rev, 2006, 11: 231239.
   Google Scholar