8
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Papers

Comparison Between Single Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis

, , , , &
Pages 391-396 | Published online: 11 Mar 2016

References

  • Chamberlain K. S., Sakpal S. V. A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 9: 1733–1740.
  • Navarra G., Pozza E., Occhionorelli S., Carcoforo P., Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg, 1997, 84: 695.
  • Bokobza B., Valverde A., Magne E. et al. Single umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the early experience of the Club Coelio. J Visc Surg, 2010, 147: 253–257.
  • Edwards e., Bradshaw A., Ahearne P. et al. Single-incision lapa-roscpic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 Patients. Surg Endose, 2010, 24: 2241–2247.
  • Hernandez J., Morton e., Ross S., Albrink M., Rosemurgy A. Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg, 2009, 75: 681–685.
  • Rivas H., Varela E., Scott D. Single-incision laparoscopic chole-cystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24: 1403–1412.
  • Erbella J., Bunch G. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24: 1958–1961.
  • Curcillo P., wu A., Podolsky E. et al. Cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24: 1854–1860.
  • Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004, 240: 205213.
  • National Institutes of Health. Consensus conference: gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA, 1993, 269: 10181024.
  • Connor S. Single-port-access cholecystectomy: history should not be allowed to repeat. World J Surg, 2009, 33 :1020–1021.
  • Tsimoyiannis E., Tsimogiannis K., Pappas-Gogos G. et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24: 1842–1848.
  • Fronza J., Linn J., Nagle A., Soper N. A single institution’s experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery, 2010, 148: 731–734.
  • Lee P., Lo C., Lai P., Chang J., Huang S., Lin M., Lee P. Randomised clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy versus minlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg, 2010, 97: 1007–1012.
  • Aprea G., Coppola E., Guida F., Masone S., Persico G. Laparoen-doccopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res, 2011, 166: 109–112.
  • Asakuma M., Hayashi M., Komeda K. et al. Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on post-operative pain. Br J Surg, 2011, 98: 991995.
  • Marks J., Tacchino R., Roberts K et al. Prospective randomised controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of preliminary data. Am J Surg, 2011, 201: 369–373.
  • Prasad A., Mukherjee K., Kaul S., Kaur M. Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: Conventional laparoscopy versus single incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg, 2011, 7: 2427.
  • wu S., Han J., Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2011, 21: 25–28.
  • Ma J., Cassera M., Spaun G., Hammil C., Hansen P., Aliabadi-whale S. Randomised controlled trial comparing single-port lapa-roscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy. Ann Surg, 2011, 254: 22–27.
  • Lirici M. M., Califano A. D., Angelini P., Corcione F. Laparoen-doscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg, 2011, 202: 45–52.
  • Lai E. C., Yang G. P., Tang C. N., Yih P. C., Chan O. C., Li M. K. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision lapa-roscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparo-scopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg, 2011, 202: 254–258.
  • Joseph S., Todd Moore B., Brent Sorensen G. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with the gold standard. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25: 3008–3015.
  • Chow A., Purkayastha S., omer A., Pefanis D., Paraskevas P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery. A retrospective comparison with 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg, 2011, 145: 1187–91
  • Vidal o., Valentini M., Ginesta C. et al. Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011, 21: 683–686.
  • Joseph M., Philips M., Farrel T., Rupp C. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg, 2012, 256: 1–6.
  • Waage A., Nilsson M. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152,776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg, 2006, 141: 1207–1213.
  • Nuzzo G., Giuliante F., Giovannini I. et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg, 2005, 140: 986–992.
  • Markar S., Karthikesalingam A., Thurmurthy S., Muirhead I., Kinross J., Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26: 1205–1213.
  • Hauters P., Auvray S., Cardin J. L. et al. Comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective trial of the Club Coelio. Surg Endosc, 2012 Dec 7 [Epub ahead of print].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.