References
- Liapis C, Mackey WC, Perler B, et al. Comparison of SVS and ESVS carotid disease management guidelines. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38:243–245.
- Hobson RW, Mackey WC, Ascher E, et al. Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:480–486.
- Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:1–19.
- Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Vascular Study Group of Northern New England, et al. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:897–904.
- Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators, et al. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453.
- Demirel S, Bruijnen H, Attigah N, et al. The effect of eversion and conventional-patch technique in carotid surgery on postoperative hypertension. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:80–86.
- Menyhei G, Bjorck M, Beiles B, et al. Outcome following carotid endarterectomy: lessons learned from a large international vascular registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:735–740.
- DeBakey ME, Crawford ES, Cooley DA, et al. Surgical consideration of occlusive disease in the innominate, carotid, subclavian and vertebral arteries. Ann Surg. 1959;149:690–710.
- Etheredge SN. A simple technic for carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg. 1970;120:275–278.
- Raithel D. Carotid eversion endarterectomy: a better technique than the standard operation? Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5:471–472.
- Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray AM, Bull L, et al. Quality of life after TIA and stroke: ten-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study. Neurology. 2013;81:1588–1595.
- Cao P, Rango PD, Cieri E, et al. Eversion versus conventional endarterectomy. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004;17:236–242.
- Harrison G, Brennan J, Naik J, et al. Patch variability following carotid endarterectomy: a survey of Great Britain and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:411–415.
- Demirel S, Attigah N, Bruijnen H, et al. Changes in baroreceptor sensitivity after eversion carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:1322–1328.
- Mehta M, Rahmani O, Dietzek AM, et al. Eversion technique increases the risk for post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:839–845.
- Schneider JS, Helenowski IB, Jackson CR, On behalf of the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group, et al. A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:1216–1222.
- Harrison GJ, How TV, Poole RJ, et al. Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:418–427.
- Demirel S, Macek L, Bruijnen H, et al. Eversion carotid endarterectomy is associated with decreased baroreceptor sensitivity compared to the conventional technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:1–8.
- Cao PG, de Rango P, Zannetti S, et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD001921. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001921
- Patel RB, Beaulieu P, Homa K, et al. Shared quality data are associated with increased protamine use and reduced bleeding complications after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:1518–1524.
- Antonopoulos CN, Kakisis JD, Sergentanis TN, et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42:751–765.
- Cao P, Giordano G, Rango PD, Collaborators of the EVEREST Study Group, et al. A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: Study design and preliminary results: The Everest Trial. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:595–605.