Ten year experience with the concomitant Maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation

References

• Cox J, Schuessler R, D’Agostino H, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101(4):569–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiano RJ, Jr, Gaynor SL. Atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery using the Atricure™ device. Op Tech. 2004;9(1):24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shen J, Bailey M, Damiano RJ. Surgery for lone atrial fibrillation: present state-of-the-art. Innovations. 2009;4(5):248–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lall SC, Melby SJ, Voeller RK, et al. The effect of ablation technology on surgical outcomes after the Cox-maze procedure: a propensity analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(2):389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballaux PK, Cathenis KK, Brondeel R, et al. Mid-term follow-up after maze IV procedures for concomitant atrial fibrillation. Acta Chir Belg. 2014;114(2):99–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893–2962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society . Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins H, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–e444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henn MC, Lancaster TS, Miller JR, et al. Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(5):1168–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ad N, Holmes SD, Massimiano PS, et al. Long-term outcome following concomitant mitral valve surgery and Cox maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):983–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox JL, Schuessler RB, Lappas DG, et al. An 8 1/2-year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation. Ann Surg. 1996;224(3):267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Xie A, La Meir M, et al. Surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart. 2014;100(9):722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng DCH, Ad N, Martin J, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations. 2010;5(2):84–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ad N, Barnett S, Lefrak EA, et al. Impact of follow-up on the success rate of the cryosurgical maze procedure in patients with rheumatic heart disease and enlarged atria. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(5):1073–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Five-year outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan AN, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, et al. Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review en meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e004549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber D, Rostock T, Frohlich M, et al. Five-year follow-up after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using the stepwise approach and prognostic factors of success. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(2):308–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badhwar V, Rankin J, Ad N, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States: trends and propensity matched outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(2):493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C, Jin M-N, Lee J-H, et al. Predictors of sick sinus syndrome in patients after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(1):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders P, Morton JB, Kistler PM, , et al. Electrophysiological and electroanatomic characterization of the atria in sinus node disease: evidence of diffuse atrial remodeling. Circulation. 2004;109(12):1514–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ad N, Henry L, Shuman DJ, et al. A more specific anticoagulation regimen is required for patients after the Cox-Maze procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(4):1331–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlingloff F, Oberhoffer M, Quasdorff I, et al. Oral anticoagulation after successful atrial fibrillation ablation operations: is it necessary? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1471–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiano RJ, Schwartz FH, Bailey MS, et al. The Cox-Maze IV procedure: predictors of late recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(1):113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ad N, Henry L, Holmes SD, et al. The association between early atrial arrhythmia and long-term return to sinus rhythm for patients following the Cox maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(2):295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrance CP, Henn MC, Miller JR Jr., et al. Comparison of the stand-alone Cox-Maze IV procedure to the concomitant Cox-Maze IV and mitral valve procedure for atrial fibrillation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(1):55–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saint LL, Bailey MS, Prasad S, et al. Cox-Maze IV results for patients with lone atrial fibrillation versus concomitant mitral disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(3):789–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar