Cervical cancer incidence in Denmark over six decades (1943–2002)

References

• Sigurdsson K. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs: trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78(6)478–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, Munoz N, Barros-Dios XM, Borras J, et al. International trends in incidence of cervical cancer: II. Squamous-cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2000; 86(3)429–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, et al. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14(3)677–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anttila A, Pukkala E, Soderman B, Kallio M, Nieminen P, Hakama M. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963–1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 1999; 83(1)59–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, Munoz N, Barros-Dios XM, Parkin DM. International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998; 75(4)536–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen P, Kallio M, Hakama M. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85(6)1017–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storm HH. The Danish Cancer Registry, a self-reporting national cancer registration system with elements of active data collection. IARC Sci Publ 1991; (95): 220–36
   Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Volume VI. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 1992
   Google Scholar
• Lynge E. Cervical cancer screening in Denmark: can cervical cancer screening be cost effective?. New Insights in Gynecology and Obstetrics Lancs, B Ottesen, A Tabor. Parthenon Publishing. 1998; 251–6
   Google Scholar
• Lynge E. Cervical cancer screening. Ugeskr Laeger 2002; 164(2)171–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sparen P, Gustafsson L, Friberg LG, Ponten J, Bergstrom R, Adami HO. Improved control of invasive cervical cancer in Sweden over six decades by earlier clinical detection and better treatment. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(3)715–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström R, Sparen P, Adami HO. Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening. Br J Cancer 1999; 81(1)159–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devesa SS, Young JL, Jr, Brinton LA, Fraumeni JF, Jr. Recent trends in cervix uteri cancer. Cancer 1989; 64(10)2184–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Semenciw R, Probert A, Mao Y. Cervical cancer in Canada: changing patterns in incidence and mortality. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11(1)24–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan PG, Sung HY, Sawaya GF. Changes in cervical cancer incidence after three decades of screening US women less than 30 years old. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102(4)765–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbur DC. Endocervical glandular atypia: a “new” problem for the cytologist. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13(5)463–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulk S, Visser O, Rozendaal L, Verheijen RH, Meijer CJ. Incidence and survival rate of women with cervical cancer in the Greater Amsterdam area. Br J Cancer 2003; 89(5)834–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR, Key CR. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States – a 24-year population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78(2)97–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SS, Sherman ME, Hildesheim A, Lacey JV, Jr, Devesa S. Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women and black women in the United States for 1976–2000. Cancer 2004; 100(5)1035–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Nguyen-Dinh X, Day NE. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92(2)150–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell H, Medley G, Gordon I, Giles G. Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefit. Br J Cancer 1995; 71(4)894–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockton D, Cooper P, Lonsdale RN. Changing incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in East Anglia. J Med Screen 1997; 4(1)40–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng T, Holford TR, Ma Z, Chen Y, Liu W, Ward BA, et al. The continuing increase in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a birth cohort phenomenon. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25(2)252–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar