0
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Longitudinal trends in cervical cytological lesions and the effect of risk factors. A 30-year overview

&
Pages 350-358 | Received 23 Aug 2005, Published online: 03 Aug 2009

References

  • Koss LG. Current concepts of intraepithelial neoplasia in the uterine cervix. Appl Pathol 1987; 5: 7–18
  • Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M, Prorok PC. Report on working of the UICC project on evaluation of screening for cancer. Int J Cancer 1990; 46: 761–9
  • Coleman D, Day N, Dougas G, Farmery E, Lynge E, Philip J, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Europe Against Cancer Programme. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A(suppl. 4)S1–38
  • Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 244–65
  • Anonymous. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop. JAMA 1989; 262: 931–4
  • Papanicoloau GN. A survey of the actualities and potentialities of exfoliative cytology in cancer diagnosis. Ann Med 1948; 30: 661–74
  • Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathol Annu, SC Sommers, 1973; 301–28
  • Sigurdsson K. Trends in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in Iceland through 1995: evaluation of targeted age groups and screening intervals. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 486–92
  • Sigurdsson K, Adalsteinsson S, Tulinius H, Ragnarsson J. The value of screening as an approach to cervical cancer control in Iceland, 1964–1986. Int J Cancer 1989; 43: 1–5
  • V Gebski, Leung, O, McNeil, D, Linn, D, (eds). SPIDA User's Manual, 6th ed., New South WalesAustralia: Statistical Computing Laboratory, Macquarie University, 1992.
  • Sigurdsson K, Adalsteinsson S. Risk variables affecting high-grade Pap smears at second visit: effects of screening interval, year, age and low-grade smears. Int J Cancer 2001; 94: 884–8
  • Kristensen GB, Skyggebjerg KD, Holund B, Holm K, Hansen MK. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Cytol 1991; 35: 47–50
  • Miller AB. Principles of screening and of the evaluation of screening programs. Screening for Cancer, AB Miller. Academic Press, Orlando 1985; 3–24
  • Anonymous. IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening. Summary chapter. IARC Sci Publ 1986; 76: 133–42
  • Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964–1991. Int J Cancer 1993; 54: 563–70
  • Chamberlain, J. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer. IARC Sci Publ 1986; 161–8.
  • Laukkanen P, Koskela P, Pukkala E, Dillner J, Läärä E, Knekt P, et al. Time trends in incidence and prevalence of human papillomavirus type 6, 11 and 16 infections in Finland. J Gen Virol 2003; 84: 2105–9
  • Bender SS, Geirsson RT, Kosmen E. Trends in teenage fertility, abortion and pregnancy rates in Iceland compared with other Nordic countries, 1976–99. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 38–47
  • Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, Ransley JE. Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 973–6
  • Sigurdsson K, Benediktsdottir K, Snorradottir M, Saemundsson H, Olafsson JH, Einarsson GV. Cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and koilocytotic lesions of the lower genitalia in an Icelandic population. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1991; 1: 49–57
  • Bekkers RLM, Hanselaar AGJM, Melchers WJG, van Schaik JHM, Boonstra H, Massunger LFAG. Management of patients with two consecutive ASC-US smears. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004; 6: 677–81
  • Sigurdsson, K, Sigvaldason, H. Longitudinal trends in cervical histological lesions (CIN 2–3 + ). A twenty-five year overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:359–365.
  • Sigurdsson, K, Sigvaldason, H. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Iceland, 1964–2002: study on trends in incidence and mortality and the effect of risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:343–349.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.