Choosing fertilization method by analyzing sperm morphology or by performing swim-up preparation

References

• Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enginsu ME, Dumoulin JCM, Pieters MHEC, Bras M, Evers JLH, Geraedts JPM. Evaluation of human sperm morphology using strict criteria after Diff-Quik staining: correlation of morphology with fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 854–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Baker H. Test of human sperm function and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 465–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Menkveld R, Kruger TF, Steeno O. Sperm morphology assessment: historical review in relation to fertility. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1: 543–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee K, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 73–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin K, Söderlund B, Hamberger L. The relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization, pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic injection programme. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 2676–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvist, U, Björndahl, L. Manual on Basic Semen Analysis. ESHRE Monographs 2002: 21–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kuster CE, Singer RS, Althouse GC. Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm. Theriogenology 2004; 61: 691–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberger L, Lundin K, Sjögren A, Söderlund B. Indications for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(Suppl 1)128–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm–Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999
   Google Scholar
• Kruger TF, Swanson RJ, Acosta AA, Matta JF, Simmons KF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Kotze TJvW, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 586–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Oettlé EE, Kruger TF, Swanson RJ, Acosta AA, Oehninger S. Atlas of Human Sperm Morphology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1991; 117
   Google Scholar
• Robinson JN, Lockwood GM, Dokras A, Egan DM, Nicholson SC, Ross C, et al. Does isolated teratozoospermia affect performance in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 870–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höst E, Lindenberg S, Ernst E, Christensen F. Sperm morphology and IVF: embryo quality in relation to sperm morphology following the WHO and Kruger's strict criteria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 526–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repping S, van Weert JM, Mol BWJ, de Vries JWA, van der Veen F. Use of the total motile sperm count to predict total fertilization failure in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 22–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemrev JPT, Lens JW, McDonnell J, Schoemaker J, Vermeiden JPW. The postwash total progressively motile sperm cell count is a reliable predictor of total fertilization failure during in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 884–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Nygren KG. The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE): assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2002; 19: 490–503
   Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2004. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril ; 81 2004; 81: 1207–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurin AJ, Hausken J, Hillensjö T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2392–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar