References
- Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hankins GDV, . Caesarean delivery and caesarean hysterectomy. Williams Obstetrics20th edition, Cunningham, , et al. Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT 1997; 509–31
- Kerr-Wilson R. Caesarean section on demand. In: Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Harcourt Publishers Ltd. 2001: 126–28.
- Ryding EL. Investigation of 33 women who demanded a caesarean section for personal reasons. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993; 72(4)280
- Gomen R, Tamir A, Degani S. Obstetricians’ opinions regarding patient choice in caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99(4)577–80
- Egwuatu VE, Ezeh IOU. Vaginal delivery in Nigeria Women after a previous section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990; 32: 1–6
- Johanson RB, El-Timini S, Rigby C, Young P, Jones P. Caesarean section by choice could fulfill the inverse care law. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97(1)20–2
- Behague DP. Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2002; 26(4)473–507
- Be Hague DP, Victoria CG, Burros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision-making, patient choice or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ. 2002; 324(7343)942–5
- Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Robertsson C, Waldenstrom U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG. 2002; 109(6)618–23
- Okonofua F. Optimizing caesarean section rates in West Africa. Lancet. 2001; 358(9290)1289
- Illobachie CC. Delivery after a previous caesarean section. A review of 836 cases. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981; 7(1)9–10
- Hart G. Maternal attitudes in prepared and unprepared caesarean deliveries. JOGN Nurs. 1980; 9(4)243–5