Total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases? A meta-analysis

References

• Richardson EH. A simple technique for abdominal panhysterectomy. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1929; 48: 248–51
   Google Scholar
• Bergman P, Ferbas E. Totalextirpation eller supravaginalamputation av uterus? [Total extirpation or supravaginal amputation of the uterus?]. Läkertidningen 1961; 58: 3624–32
   Google Scholar
• Ekelöf-Stangus S. Total versus supravaginal hysterectomy. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn (Suppl) 1963; 52: 1–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimbrough RA. General considerations in the treatment of myoma uteri. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1958; 1: 437–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen L, Jensen VC. Total contra subtotal hysterektomi. [Total versus subtotal hysterectomy]. Ugeskr Læger 1961; 123: 298–307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilkku P. Abdominal hysterectomy versus supravaginal uterine amputation with reference to carcinoma of the cervical stump, urinary symptoms and sexual aspects. Academic dissertation, University of Turku, Finland, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Sills ES, Saini J, Steiner CA, McGee M, 3rd, Gretz HF, 3rd. Abdominal hysterectomy practice patterns in the United States. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998; 63: 277–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redburn JC, Murphy MFG. Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 388–95
   Google Scholar
• Cullhed S, Rybo G, Carlsson P, Hagenfeldt K, Haglund U, Johnsson M , et al. Ta’ bort livmodern? Orsaker metoder, och alternativ. Konsensuskonferens 1993 Stockholm. [Removing the uterus? Causes, methods and alternatives. Consensus conference, 1993, Stockholm.].
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Settnes A, Tabor A. Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988–1998. A register based trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 267–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorma S, Teperi J, Hurskainen R, Keskimäki I, Kujansuu E. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987–1995 – a register based analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 770–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backe B, Lilleeng S. Hysterektomi i Norge. Datakvalitet og klinisk praksis. [Hysterectomy in Norway]. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1993; 113: 971–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Review Manager (RevMan) [Computerprogram] Version 4.2 for Windows, Oxford, England. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• RevMan Analyses. [Computerprogram] Version 1.0 for Windows. In: Review Manager (RevMan) 4.2. Oxford, England. Cochrane Collaboration. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Markowska J, Markowska A. Calkowite, czy nadszyjkowe wyciecie macicy?. Gin Pol 2000; 71: 34–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wydra D, Ciach K, Sawicki S, Wilhelm J, Emerich J. Porownanie zycia seksualnego po nadszyjkowym i calkowitym usunieciu macicy. Gin Pol 2004; 75: 274–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Toukhy TA, Hefni MA, Davies AE, Mahadevan S. The effect of different types of hysterectomy on urinary and sexual functions: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 420–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKinnon DA, Counseller VS. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions. Surg Obstet Gynecol 1942; 14: 957–60
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen HS, Mäkinen JI. Retrospective analysis of 711 patients operated for pelvic relaxation in 1983–1989. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1993; 42: 109–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujansuu E, Teisala K, Punnonen R. Urethral closure function after total and subtotal hysterectomy measured by urethrocystometry. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1989; 27: 105–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acken HS, Zarou GS. Hysterectomy for benign lesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962; 84: 113–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahen CH. Das Stump-Karcinom nach supravaginaler Uterusamputation, seine Problematik, Früherfassung, Therapie und Prophylaxe. Gynaecologia 1965; 160: 105–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cahen CH. Die genitale Morbidität nach Hysterektomie wegen Myomatosis. Vergleich der Uterusextirpation mit der supravaginalen Amputation. Gynaecologia 1968; 165: 395–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Gluud C, Ottesen BS, Tabor A, and the Danish Hysterectomy Group. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: An observational study with one-year follow-up. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 64–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iosif CS, Bekassy Z, Rydhström H. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in middle-aged women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1988; 26: 255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkku P, Hirvonen T, Grönroos M. Supra-vaginal uterine amputation vs. abdominal hysterectomy: the effect on urinary symptoms with special reference to pollakisuria, nocturia and dysuria. Maturitas 1981; 3: 197–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkku P. Supravaginal uterine amputation vs. hysterectomy. Effects on coital frequency and dyspareunia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 141–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkku P, Grönroos M, Hirvonen T, Rauramo L. Supravaginal uterine amputation vs. hysterectomy. Effect on libido and orgasm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 147–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkku P. Supravaginal uterine amputation versus hysterectomy with reference to subjective bladder symptoms and incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 375–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathorst-Böös J, Fuchs T, von Schoultz B. Consumers’ attitude to hysterectomy. Experience of 678 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 230–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann G, Olesen PG, Hansen V, Lauszus F, Ljungstrøm B, Rasmussen KL. The short-term prevalence of de novo urinary symptoms after different modes of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 2004; 15: 14–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roovers J-PWR, van der Bon JG, van der Vaart CH, Fousert DMM, Heintz PM. Does mode of hysterectomy influence micturition and defecation?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 945–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roovers J-PWR, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz PM on behalf of the Hysterectomy Vaginal versus Abdominal study group. Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy. BMJ 2003; 327: 774–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruoss CF. Supravaginal hysterectomy – a less invasive procedure. J Obset Gynecol 1995; 15: 406–9
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sørensen HC , et al. Randomized clinical trial of total versus subtotal hysterectomy: one-year follow up results. Abstract of NFOG Congress 2002, Umeå, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sørensen HC , et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms after total and subtotal hysterectomy: results of a randomized trial and a simultaneously performed observational study. Abstract at the 27th annual meeting of the IUGA 2002 in Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sørensen HC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of total compared to subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. BJOG 2003; 110: 1088–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sørensen HC, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms after total and subtotal hysterectomy. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2005; 16: 257–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppermann M, Summit RL, Jr, Varner RE, McNeeley SG, Goodman-Gruen D, Learman LA, et al. Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 1309–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalos O, Bjerle P. Bladder, wall mechanics and micturition before and after subtotal and total hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 21: 143–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learman LA, Summitt, RL, Jr, Varner E, McNeeley SG, Goodman-Gruen D, Richter HE , for the total or supracervical hysterectomy research group, et al. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 453–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Manyonda I, Stanton S, Ayers S, Clarkson P, Robinson G. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: effect on bladder and bowel function. Abstract number 272. 30th Annual Meeting of International Continence Society, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Manyonda I, Stanton S, Ayers S, Clarkson P, Robinson G. Sexual function after hysterectomy. Abstract number 319. 30th Annual Meeting of International Continence Society, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Ayers S, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I. Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1318–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Ayers S, Georgakapolou A, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I. Hysterectomy improves quality of life and decreases psychiatric symptoms: a prospective and randomized comparison of total versus subtotal hysterectomy. BJOG 2004; 111: 1115–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobbe V, Gimbel H, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sørensen HC, et al. Sexuality after total and subtotal hysterectomy. Results of a randomized clinical trial and a simultaneously performed observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 191–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Ottesen B, Tabor A. Randomized trial of total versus subtotal hysterectomy: validity of the trial questionnaire. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 968–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Gluud C, Tabor A, and The Danish Hysterectomy Group. Randomised controlled trial of total versus subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. Correspondence. BJOG 2004; 111: 760–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns A. Supracervical versus total hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 903–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summit RL, Bent AE. Genuine stress incontinence: an overview. Urogynecology and Urodynamics. Theory and Practice, DR Ostergaard, AE Bent. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1996; 493–505
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen L, Rasmussen A. Bladder neck mobility evaluated by vaginal ultrasonography. Br J Urol 1993; 7: 166–71
   Google Scholar
• Käser O, Iklé FA, Hirsch HA. Atlas of Gynecological Surgery. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York 1985; 7.4
   Google Scholar
• Demirci F, Ozden S, Alpay Z, Demirci ET. The effect of abdominal hysterectomy on bladder neck and urinary incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 39: 239–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen L. Effect of vaginal devices on bladder neck mobility in stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penntinen J, Lindholm EL, Kaar K, Kauppila A. Successful colposuspension in stress incontinence reduces bladder neck mobility and increases pressure transmission to the urethra. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1989; 244: 233–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton P, Dolan LM. Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 2004; 111(Suppl. 1)5–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen L, Larsen JP. Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2003; 14: 122–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1332–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewies AAA, Olah KSJ. Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy: a surgical advance or a backward step?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 1376–9
   Google Scholar
• Okara EO, Jones KD, Sutton C. Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 1017–20
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren M, Poromaa IS, Stjerndahl JH, Renström B. Postoperative infections and antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy in Sweden: a study by the Swedish National Register for Gynecologic Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 1202–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Cruickshank C, Story E, Ethridge D, Lapane K. Risk factors for febrile morbidity after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 86–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters W, Johnson V. Human sexual response. Little, Brown and Co, Boston, MA 1966
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sørensen HC , et al. Unpublished data from a randomized clinical trial and an observational study of total or subtotal hysterectomy.
   Google Scholar
• Sills ES, Saini J, Applegate MS, McGee M, Gretz III HF. Supracervical and total abdominal hysterectomy trends in New York State: 1990–1996. J Urban Health 1998; 75: 903–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepine LH, Hillis SD, Marchbank PA, Koonin LM, Morrow B, Kieke BA, et al. Hysterectomy surveillance 1980–1993. In: CDC Surveillance Summaries, August 8, 1997. MMWR 1997; 46: 1–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esdaile BA, Chailian RA, Del Priore G, Smith JR. The role of supracervical hysterectomy in benign disease of the uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 26: 52–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar