References
- Lov om kunstig befrugtning [Law concerning assisted reproduction] nr. 460 paragraph 20 (cf. Sundhedsstyrelsens Vejledning af 30. september 1997 paragraph 56.)
- Bygedeman M. The Swedish insemination act. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70: 265–6
- Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples’ attitudes. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2052–6
- Frith L. Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 818–24
- McWhinnie A. Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 807–17
- Mikkelsen M. Den skjulte sandhed om far [The secrecy of paternity]. Aarhus Stiftstidende. August 1992; 22: 7
- Golombok S, Murray C, Jadva V, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Rust J. Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationship and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1918–24
- Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, Golombok S. School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents disclosure patterns. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 810–9
- Assisterad befruktning [ assisted reproduction] 1999 and 2002. Available on WWW at: www.socialstyrelsen.se [ The Swedish Health Authority].
- Lui SC, Weaver SM, Robinson J, Debono M, Nieland M, Killick SR, et al. A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 234–8
- Mahlstedt PP, Probasco KA. Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 747–53
- Pedersen B, Nielsen AF, Lauritsen JG. Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Sperm donors – their motivations and attitudes to artificial insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 701–5
- Schover LR, Rothmann SA, Collins RL. The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 575–9