Effects of ovarian high response on implantation and pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (with GnRH agonist and rFSH)

References

• de Ziegler D. Hormonal control of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 4–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh D, Sengupta J. Another look at the issue of peri-implantation oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedler S, Zimerman A, Schachter M, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Ron El R. The midluteal decline in serum estradiol levels is drastic but not deleterious for implantation after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients with normal or high responses. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 54–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon C, Cano F, Valbuena D, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1995; 9: 2432–7
   Google Scholar
• Damario MA, Barmat L, Liu HC, Davis OK, Rosenwaks Z. Dual suppression with oral contraceptives and gonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonists improves in-vitro fertilization outcome in high responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 2359–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Cano F, Remohi J, Simon C. Lower implantation rates in high responders: evidence for an altered endocrine milieu during the preimplantation period. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 1190–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner JP, Brzyski RG, Oehninger S, Veeck LL, Simonetti S, Muasher SJ. Combined impact of the number of pre-ovulatory oocytes and cryopreservation on IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 284–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmas P, Kolibianakis EM, Devroey P. Association of estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration and pregnancy achievement in IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 2446–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossum GT, Davidson A, Paulson RJ. Ovarian hyperstimulation inhibits embryo implantation in the mouse. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer. 1998; 6: 7–10
   Google Scholar
• Simon C, Garcia Velasco JJ, Valbuena D, Peinado JA, Moreno C, Remohi J, et al. Increasing uterine receptivity by decreasing estradiol levels during the preimplantation period in high responders with the use of a follicle stimulating hormone step-down regimen. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 234–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Yeung WSB, Lau EYL, So WWK, Ho PC. High serum E2 concentrations in fresh IVF cycles do not impair implantation and pregnancy rates in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 250–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman R, Fries N, Testart J, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Frydman R. Evidence for an adverse effect of elevated serum estradiol concentration on embryo implantation. Fertil Steril. 1988; 49: 118–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 401–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi A, Drews M, Bergh PA, Miller BT, Scott RT. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2002; 76: 670–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahceci M, Ulug U, Erden HF, Mesut A, Jozwiak EA. Elevated oestradiol concentrations are not associated with increased first trimester miscarriage rates of singleton gestations conceived by assisted conception treatment. RBM Online. 2006; 12: 33–38
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou T, Guibert J, Goffinet F, Patrat C, Fulla Y, Janssens Y, et al. Percentile curves of serum E2 levels during controlled ovarian stimulation in 905 cycles stimulated with recombinant FSH show that high E2 is not detrimental to IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 2846–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harrison KL, Shaw JM, Wilson LM, Hennessey JF. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986; 3: 284–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golan A, Ron-El R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Weinraub Z., Caspi E. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989; 44: 430–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril. 1986; 2: 268–72
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Sun XX, Chen JL, Shi LT, Gao XH, Wang YW, et al. Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Reprod Contracept. 2004; 24: 218–21, (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Pena JE, Chang PL, Chan LK, Zeitoun K, Thornton MH, Sauer MV. Supraphysiological estradiol levels do not affect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 83–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basir GS, So WWK, Ng EHY, Ho PC. Morphometric analysis of peri-implantation endometrium in patients having excessively high oestradiol concentrations after ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 435–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadat P, Boostanfar R, Slater CC, Tourgeman DE, Stanczyk FZ, Paulson RJ. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with elevated progesterone levels in the late follicular phase and accelerated endometrial maturation in the subsequent luteal phase. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82: 167–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikas G, Develioglu OH, Toner JP, Jones HW, Jr. Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 787–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EHY, Chan CC, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured during early luteal phase by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in excessive ovarian responders. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 924–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar