Success in intrauterine insemination: the role of etiology

References

• Garceau L, Henderson J, Davis LJ, Petrou S, Henderson LR, McVeigh E, et al. Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3090–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2000; 355: 13–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips Z, Barraza-Llorens M, Posnett J. Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 95–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claman P, Wilkie V, Collins D. Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 hours after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin yields the same pregnancy rates as after superovulation therapy. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 13–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iberico G, Vioque J, Ariza N, Lozano JM, Roca M, Llacer J, et al. Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1308–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE, Stein AL, Marrs RP. Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: Analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1522–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: An analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 698–703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): Statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1892–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh C, Buck G, Priore R, Wacktawski-Wende J, Severino M. Follicular response and pregnancy among infertile women undergoing ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 328–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RK, Hou JW, Ho HY, Hwu YM, Lin MH, Tsai YC, et al. Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination. Int J Androl 2002; 25: 277–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Weert JM, Repping S, Van Voorhis BJ, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 612–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasch J. Gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9: 664–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins J. Stimulated intra-uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility. current best evidence for the advanced treatment of unexplained subfertility. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 907–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes EG. Stimulated intra-uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility. ‘effective treatment’ or ‘not a natural choice’?. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 912–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Deblaere K, Bosmans E, Cox A, Jacobs P, Janssen M, et al. Semen quality and intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7: 485–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG. Homologous intrauterine insemination. an evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 74–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Rye PH. Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin for ovulation induction: comparison to clomiphene citrate alone and human menopausal gonadotrophin alone. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 56–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan GL, Moss V, Davis WA, Sparks AE, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. Oral ovulation induction agents combined with low-dose gonadotropin injections and intrauterine insemination: cost- and clinical effectiveness. J Reprod Med 2005; 50: 943–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou TC, Guibert J, Savale M, Goffinet F, Fournier C, Merlet F, et al. Low dose recombinant FSH treatment may reduce multiple gestations caused by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. BJOG 2004; 111: 1277–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbrouck E, Spiessens C, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe T. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 566–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, Sartor BM, Rye PH, Pyrzak R. Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 1088–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar