References
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The Medical Birth Registry. Annual reports. www.fhi.no.
- Rosenthal AN, Paterson-Brown S. Is there an incremental rise in the risk of obstetric intervention with increasing maternal age?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 1064–9
- Kennedy R, Patel N. The significance of increasing caesarean section rates. Br J Hosp Med. 1986; 36: 336–41
- Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D. Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 41: 249–52
- Mc Gurgan P, Coulter-Smith S, Donovan PJO. A national confidential survey of obstetrician's personal preferences regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97: 17–9
- Wright JB, Wright AL, Simpson NA, Bryce FC. A survey of trainee obstetricians preferences for childbirth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97: 23–5
- Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S. Obstetricians’ opinions regarding patient choice in cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 577–80
- Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians’ personal preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997; 73(1)1–4
- International Confederation of Midwives. The promotion of vaginal birth in preference to caesarean section in the absence of evidence-based criteria. Position Statement. Vienna Conference 2002. www.internationalmidwives.org.
- Harder U, Reutter R, Luyben A, Gross MM. Hebammen präferieren vaginale Geburt statt Wunschsektio. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2002; 206: 72–4
- Irgens LM. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 435–9
- Norwegian standard classification of education. Revised 1989. Official Statistics of Norway. Oslo: Statistics Norway, ISBN 82-537-2793-3.
- Kolas T, Hofoss D, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, Hager R, et al. Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 864–70
- Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Report of a technical working group. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996. www.who.int.