‘See and treat’ regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

References

• Gustavsson L, Ponten J, Zack M, Adami HO. International incidence rates of invasive cancer after introduction of cytologic screening. Cancer Causes Control. 1997; 8: 755–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edvards RP, Nauman RW, Partridge EE, Shingleton HM, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 1994; 52: 175–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason M. Colposopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991; 98: 1273–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker B, Garcia FA, Warner J, Lozerski J, Hatch K. Baseline inaccuracy rates for the comparison of cervical biopsy to loop electrosurgical excision histopathologic diagnoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 349–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis C, Surkus MD, Terry A, Harrison MD. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1180–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massad SL, Markwell S, Cejtin HE, Collins Y. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasian among young women with abnormal screening cytology. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005; 9: 225–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berdishevsky L, Karmin R, Chuang L. Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a 2- versus 3-step approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 1424–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numnum TM, Kirby O, Leath CA 3rd, Huh WK, Alvarez RD, Straughn JM, Jr. A prospective evaluation of ‘see and treat’ i.n women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005; 9: 2–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson WR, Lud ED, Adams J. The predictive value of LEEP specimen margin status for residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1998; 8: 109–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, Niv J, Kupferminc MJ, Bornstei J, et al. Combined colposcopy, loop conisation, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 78: 47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Khalili M, Hirschowitz L, Rali F, Porter R. Predicting residual disease after excision of cervical dysplasia. BJOG. 2003; 110: 952–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales DI, Jr, Zah CM, Retzloff MG, Moore WF, Kost ER, Snyder RR. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 315–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeyer AD, Jason D, Wright JD, Gao F, Powell MA. Persistent and recurrent cervical dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1379–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardeil F, Berry-Walsh C, Prendivilie W, Clinch J, Turner MJ. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 419–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafi MI, Dunn JA, Buxton EJ, Finn CB, Jordan JA, Luesley DM. Abnormal cervical cytology following large loop excision of the transformation zone: a case controlled study. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 100: 145–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Role of loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the evaluation of abnormal test results. Washington, DC: The College; 1993. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 195.
   Google Scholar
• Szurkus DC, Harrison TA. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1180–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas-Turanzas M, Follen M, Benedet JL, Cantor SB. See-and-treat strategy for diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 43–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östör AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993; 12: 186–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoborg K, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 423–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramani L, Orbell S, Hagger M, Brown V, Tidy J. Do women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy?. BJOG. 2007; 114: 39–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar