References
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1385–90.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 62. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1161–8.
- Zalar R, Quilligan E. The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 135: 239–46
- Amer-Wåhlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H, Hagberg H, Herbst A, Kjellmar I, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001; 358: 534–8
- Ojala K, Vääräsmäki M, Mäkikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography – a randomised controlled study. BJOG. 2006; 113: 419–23
- Greene KR, Dawes GS, Lilja H, Rosen KG. Changes in the ST waveform of the fetal lamb electrocardiogram with hypoxemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144: 950–8
- Rosen KG, Dagbjartsson A, Henriksson BA, Lagercrantz H, Kjellmer I. The relationship between circulating catecholamines and ST waveform in the fetal lamb electrocardiogram during hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 149: 190–5
- Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005; 85: 257–68
- Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. BJOG. 1999; 106: 1307–10
- Blix E, Sviggum O, Koss K, Oian P. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts. BJOG. 2003; 110: 1–5
- Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 19(3)DC006066
- Amer-Wåhlin I, Ingemarsson I, Marsal K, Herbst A. Fetal heart rate patterns and ECG ST segment changes preceding metabolic acidaemia at birth. BJOG. 2005; 112: 160–5
- Devoe L, Ross M, Wilde C, Beal M, Lysikewicz A, Maier J, et al. United States multicenter clinical usage study of the STAN 21 electronic fetal monitoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 729–34
- Ross MG, Devoe LD, Rosen KG. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2004; 15: 181–5
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159–74
- Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 57: 33–7
- Trimbos JB, Keirse MJ. Observer variability in assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. BJOG. 1978; 85: 900–6
- Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987; 25: 159–67