82
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BIRTH

Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation

, , , &
Pages 929-934 | Received 01 May 2008, Published online: 03 Aug 2009

References

  • Li XF, Fortney JA, Kotelchuck M, Glover LH. The postpartum period: the key to maternal mortality. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996; 54: 1–10
  • The prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. WHO report of technical working group. GenevaSwitzerland: World Health Organization, 1990. Report No. WHO/MCH/90.7.
  • Chua S, Ho LM, Vanaja K, Nordstrom L, Roy AC, Arulkumaran S. Validation of a laboratory method of measuring postpartum blood loss. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998; 46: 31–3
  • Haswell JN. Measured blood loss at delivery. J Ind State Med Assoc. 1981; 74: 34–6
  • Nelson GH, Ashford C, Williamson R, Amburn SD. Method for calculating blood loss at vaginal delivery. South Med J. 1981; 74: 550–2
  • Glover P. Blood loss at delivery: how accurate is your estimation?. Aust J Midwifery. 2003; 16: 21–4
  • Kolb KS, Day T, McCall WG. Accuracy of blood loss determination by health care professionals. CRNA. 1999; 10: 170–3
  • Nelson GH. Consideration of blood loss at delivery as percentage of estimated blood volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 138: 1117–9
  • Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK. Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 1991; 38: 119–24
  • Pritchard JA. Blood volume changes in pregnancy and puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962; 84: 1271
  • Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A. Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109(6)1295–300
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1039–47.
  • Crofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, Hunt LP, Fox R, Draycott TJ. Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1477–85
  • Deering S, Poggi S, Hodor J, Macedonia C, Satin AJ. Evaluation of residents’ delivery notes after a simulated shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 667–70
  • Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 36: 152–4
  • Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK. Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991; 38: 119–24
  • Bose P, Regan F, Paterson-Brown S. Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions. BJOG. 2006; 113: 919–24

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.